SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2025 / Volume: 26 Issue: 4

BALKAN MIGRATION ROUTE AND TÜRKİYE IN THE CONTEXT OF REGIONAL SECURITY COMPLEX THEORY

Sıbel Yanık Aslan(Yalova Belediyesi)0000-0003-2436-6763
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, it evaluates whether Türkiye aligns with the concept of an "insulator state" in the context of irregular migration, exploring its role in facilitating or managing migration flows.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Border security is a critical aspect of national and societal stability for many countries, presenting complex challenges for nation-states.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The large-scale population movements from Syria following the Arab Spring in 2011 have underscored the importance of effective border management strategies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, it evaluates whether Türkiye aligns with the concept of an "insulator state" in the context of irregular migration, exploring its role in facilitating or managing migration flows.
🔬Design:Review Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Balkan Migration Route · Irregular Migration · Insulator State

Abstract

Border security is a critical aspect of national and societal stability for many countries, presenting complex challenges for nation-states. The large-scale population movements from Syria following the Arab Spring in 2011 have underscored the importance of effective border management strategies. Rather than framing migration as a "national security problem," it is essential to approach these movements as multifaceted phenomena requiring balanced policies that prioritize both state interests and humanitarian considerations. The Balkan route serves as a primary pathway for migrants traveling from Syria to Europe. States along this route often perceive migration through a security lens, which can lead to the development of policies that prioritize control over humanitarian needs, potentially exacerbating vulnerabilities among migrant populations. A critical examination of this securitization reveals the need for policies that address the root causes of migration while upholding human rights. Geographically, Türkiye occupies a strategic position between countries of origin and destination, acting as a key transit state. This positioning enables Türkiye to influence migration dynamics between the Middle East and Europe. Rather than solely acting as a barrier, Türkiye's role can be understood as that of a mediator, shaping migration flows through its policies and engaging with European Union frameworks. This study analyzes the challenges posed by irregular migration along the Balkan route, with a focus on the dynamics between Europe and Türkiye. Additionally, it evaluates whether Türkiye aligns with the concept of an "insulator state" in the context of irregular migration, exploring its role in facilitating or managing migration flows.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aslan, S. Y. (2025). BALKAN MIGRATION ROUTE AND TÜRKİYE IN THE CONTEXT OF REGIONAL SECURITY COMPLEX THEORY. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 26 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1679421

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (55)

  1. Abikova, J., & Piotrowicz, W. S. (2021). Shaping the Balkan corridor: Development and changes in the migration route 2015–16. International Migration, 59(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12828
  2. Achilli, L. (2018). The “good” smuggler: The ethics and morals of human smuggling among Syrians. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 676(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217746641
  3. Adamson, F. B., & Tsourapas, G. (2019). The migration state in the Global South: Nationalizing, developmental, and neoliberal models of migration management. International Migration Review, 54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319879057
  4. Adamson, F., & Greenhill, K. (2021). The power atlas: Seven backgrounds of a networked world (pp. 84–105). European Council on Foreign Relations & Mercator Stiftung. https://ecfr.eu/special/power-atlas/people/
  5. Alpan, B. (2022). Readmission or desecuritization? The recent migration crisis and bordering narratives and practices in Turkey. https://inex.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/p_inex/Fences_Refugee_Boats_FULL_PDF__2_.pdf#page=67
  6. Bank, A., & Karadağ, R. (2014). The “Ankara moment”: The politics of Turkey’s regional power in the Middle East. Third World Quarterly, 35(2), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.878490
  7. Beznec, B., Speer, M., & Mitrović, M. (2017). Governing the Balkan route: Macedonia, Serbia and the European border regime. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung Southeast Europe. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29918.23363
  8. Bialasiewicz, L. (2012). Off-shoring and out-sourcing the borders of Europe: Libya and EU border work in the Mediterranean. Geopolitics, 17(4), 843–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2012.660579
  9. Bilgin, P. (2011). The politics of studying securitization? The Copenhagen School in Turkey. Security Dialogue, 42(4–5), 399–412.
  10. Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Carrera, S., den Hertog, L., & Parkin, J. (2015). The EU’s response to the refugee crisis: Taking stock and setting priorities. Centre for European Policy Studies. https://cdn.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/EU%20Response%20to%20the%202015%20Refugee%20Crisis_0.pdf
  12. Clewett, P., Litzkow, J., & Vallentine, J. (2024). Mixed migration in the Western Balkans: Shifting policies, smuggling dynamics and risks. Mixed Migration Centre; Danish Refugee Council.
  13. Cocco, E. (2017). Where is the European frontier? The Balkan migration crisis and its impact on relations between the EU and the Western Balkans. European View, 16, 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-017-0471-5
  14. Erdoğan, M., Eminoğlu, N., Batalla, L. A., Unutulmaz, O., & Püttmann, F. (2016). A new era in EU–Türkiye cooperation: The Syrian crisis and EU–Türkiye deal of 18 March 2016: The perceptions of European and Turkish decision makers. İktisadi Kalkınma Vakfı (İKV).
  15. Ersoy Ceylan, T. (2024). Insulator, player, or assertive insulator? Reassessing Türkiye’s role in the Eastern Mediterranean. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Diplomasi Dergisi, 7(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.51763/uid.1654694
  16. Esen, B., & Gümüşçü, S. (2016). Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 37(9), 1581–1606. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1133242
  17. European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights. (2016). Push-backs at the Greek–Macedonian border violating human rights. https://www.proasyl.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/CaseReport_Idomeni_ECtHR_20160914.pdf
  18. European Commission, Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs. (2025, June 11). Pact on migration and asylum: Commission report assesses progress and next steps halfway through implementation. https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/news/pact-migration-and-asylum-commission-report-assesses-progress-and-next-steps-halfway-through-2025-06-11_en
  19. European Council on Refugees and Exiles. (2016). The implementation of the hotspots in Italy and Greece (pp. 48–49). Dutch Refugee Council. https://www.ecre.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/HOTSPOTS-Report-5.12.2016.pdf
  20. European Council on Refugees and Exiles. (2024). AIDA country report on Croatia – 2023 update. https://www.ecre.org/aida-country-report-on-croatia-2023-update/
  21. European Council. (2003). Thessaloniki European Council: Presidency conclusions. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/20847/76279.pdf
  22. European Council. (2024). Western Balkans route. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/western-balkans-route/#situation
  23. Frontex. (2016). Western Balkan route: Annual risk analysis 2016. https://frontex.europa.eu/assets/Publications/Risk_Analysis/WB_ARA_2016.pdf
  24. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, P. (2024). Perspectives of flow and place: Rethinking notions of migration and mobility in policy-making. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50(6), 1299–1316. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2278400
  25. Huysmans, J. (2006). The politics of insecurity: Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. Routledge.
  26. İçduygu, A. (2000). The politics of international migratory regimes: Transit migration flows in Türkiye. International Social Science Journal, 52(165), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00265
  27. Imai, K. (2017). Rethinking the insulator state: Turkey’s border security and the Syrian civil war. Eurasian Border Review, 7(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.14943/ebr.7.1.19
  28. International Centre for Migration Policy Development. (2023). Western Balkans and Türkiye 2023. https://www.icmpd.org/file/download/59321/file/ICMPD%20Migration%20Outlook%20Western%20Balkans
  29. International Organization for Migration. (2022). Migration trends in the Western Balkans in 2022. https://bih.iom.int/resources/migration-trends-western-balkans-2022
  30. International Organization for Migration. (2023). Migration trends in the Western Balkans in 2022. https://serbia.iom.int
  31. International Organization for Migration. (2024). Migration trends in the Western Balkans in 2023. https://serbia.iom.int
  32. Janmyr, M. (2016). Precarity in exile: The legal status of Syrian refugees in Lebanon. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 35(4), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdw016
  33. Karadağ, S., & Üstübici, A. (2021). Protection during pre-pandemic and COVID-19 periods in Türkiye. CIDOB; ADMIGOV Project Paper 4, 6–34. https://www.cidob.org/en/publications/publication_series/project_papers/admigov/protection_during_pre_pandemic_and_covid_19_periods_in_T%C3%BCrkiye
  34. Kaya, A. (2021). Migration as a leverage tool in international relations: Turkey as a case study. Uluslararası İlişkiler, Advance online publication, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.856870
  35. Kaya, A. (2022). AB–Türkiye mülteci mutabakatı: Tampon ülke? TÜSİAD Küresel Siyaset Forumu Makale Dizisi (No. 2). https://eu.bilgi.edu.tr/media/files/T%C3%9CS%C4%B0AD_K%C3%BCresel_Siyaset_Forumu_Makale_Dizisi_No-2.pdf
  36. Kelly, R. E. (2007). Security theory in the “new regionalism.” International Studies Review, 9(1), 197–229.
  37. Kuschminder, K., Dubow, T., İçduygu, A., Üstübici, A., Kirişçioğlu, E., Engbersen, G., & Mitrovic, O. (2019). Migration consultant decision-making on the Balkan route and the EU–Türkiye statement. Maastricht Graduate School of Governance (MGSoG), United Nations University–Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT). https://mirekoc.ku.edu.tr/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/2916_Volledige_Tekst_tcm28-413430.pdf
  38. Lebrun, M., Ellingsen, T., Dumur-Laanila, H., Bujold, S., Miller, A., James, B., Akrap, G., & Mandić, J. (2025). Instrumentalized migration: Avoiding the trap (Version 2). Open Research Europe, 4, Article 251. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.18635.2
  39. Miholjcic, N. (2022). Migration as an instrument of modern political warfare: Cases of Turkey, Morocco and Belarus (Jean Monnet Network on EU Law Enforcement Working Paper Series No. 12/22). https://eulawenforcement.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Working-Paper-12-22.pdf
  40. Osso, B. N. (2025). A creeping crisis of migration management? Institutional responses and implications for “access” at the EU’s physical, legal, and social borders. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 23(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2025.2471288
  41. Puleri, M. (2021). The Balkan route (and its afterlife): The new normal in the European politics of migration. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 24(3), 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2021.2015658
  42. Saatçioğlu, B. (2020). The European Union’s refugee crisis and rising functionalism in EU–Turkey relations. Turkish Studies, 21(4), 523–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2019.1671835
  43. Sardelić, J. (2017). From temporary protection to transit migration: Responses to refugee crises along the Western Balkan route (RSCAS Working Paper 2017/35). European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Global Governance Programme. https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/47168/RSCAS_2017_35.pdf
  44. Schloenhaldt, A. (2019). Irregular migration and smuggling of migrants along the Balkan route: 2011–2017. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/budapest/15559.pdf
  45. Souza, T. A. F. (2021). Rethinking the regional security complex theory: A South American view between 2008–2016. Revista de Estudios en Seguridad Internacional, 7(1), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.18847/1.13.7
  46. Tsourapas, G. (2019). The Syrian refugee crisis and foreign policy decision-making in Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(4), 464–481.
  47. Tsourdi, E. L., & Zardo, F. (2025). Migration governance through funding: Theoretical, normative, and empirical perspectives. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 23(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2024.2407584
  48. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (1951). Convention relating to the status of refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/media/1951-refugee-convention-and-1967-protocol-relating-status-refugees
  49. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2013). Refugee protection and international migration in the Western Balkans: Suggestions for a comprehensive regional approach (Concept note). https://www.unhcr.org/ie/media/refugee-protection-and-international-migration-western-balkans-suggestions-comprehensive
  50. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2015). Syria regional refugee response. https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/syria
  51. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2024). Refugee statistics. https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics
  52. Üstübici, A., & İçduygu, A. (2018). Border closures and externalization of immigration controls in the Mediterranean: A comparative analysis of Morocco and Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, 60, 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2018.16
  53. Weber, B. (2017). The EU–Turkey refugee deal and the not quite closed Balkan route. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/sarajevo/13436.pdf
  54. World Bank. (2025). Türkiye overview. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/turkey/overview
  55. European Council on Refugees and Exiles. (2016). The implementation of the hotspots in Italy and Greece (pp. 48–49). Dutch Refugee Council. https://www.ecre.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/HOTSPOTS-Report-5.12.2016.pdf