SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT ON THE RECONCILING THE EXCEPTION MODEL ENACTED BY TURKISH PENAL CODE ARTICLE 34/2 WITH PRINCIPLE OF FAULT

TCK MD. 34/2’DE DÜZENLENEN İSTİSNA MODELİNİN KUSUR İLKESİ İLE BAĞDAŞTIRILABİLİRLİĞİ KONUSUNDA ELEŞTİREL BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Osman İSFEN
Pages
1–46
Publication Date
2016-08-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article we conclude that; it possible to justfy this principle with crime policy adopted by legislator in the light of general prevention theories, but it is possible to reconcile with the principle of fault.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Exception model enacted in Turkish Penal Code article 34/2 for the person who commits an offence under influence of alcohol and drugs taken willingly is one of the rare transferred articles without any change from the old Turkish Penal Code no 765 to the new Turkish Penal Code no 5237.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Exception model enacted in Turkish Penal Code article 34/2 for the person who commits an offence under influence of alcohol and drugs taken willingly is one of the rare transferred articles without any change from the old Turkish Penal Code no 765 to the new Turkish Penal Code no 5237.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article we conclude that; it possible to justfy this principle with crime policy adopted by legislator in the light of general prevention theories, but it is possible to reconcile with the principle of fault.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kusur ilkesi · TCK md. 34/2 · istisna modeli

Abstract

Exception model enacted in Turkish Penal Code article 34/2 for the person who commits an offence under influence of alcohol and drugs taken willingly is one of the rare transferred articles without any change from the old Turkish Penal Code no 765 to the new Turkish Penal Code no 5237. In this article we conclude that; it possible to justfy this principle with crime policy adopted by legislator in the light of general prevention theories, but it is possible to reconcile with the principle of fault.

Özet

765 sayılı Eski Türk Ceza Kanunu’ndan hiçbir değişikliğe uğramadan 5237 sayılı Yeni Türk Ceza Kanunu’na aktarılan ender düzenlemeler arasında, iradî olarak alınan alkol veya uyuşturucu madde etkisinde suç işleyen kişi hakkında TCK md. 34/2’de yer alan istisna modeli gelmektedir. Çalışmamızda, bu kuralın genel önleyici düşünceler ışığında Kanun Koyucu’nun izlediği suç politikası doğrultusunda gerekçelendirilebileceği, ancak kusur ilkesiyle bağdaştırılmasının mümkün olmadığı neticesine varılmaktadır. İstisna modelinin kusur ilkesiyle genel anlamda uyumlu bir hâle getirilmesi zor gözükse de; eğer bu kurumdan vazgeçilmeyecekse, en azından önceden öngörülen veya öngörülebilen suçlarla sınırlandırılması gerekmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

İSFEN, O. (2016). A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT ON THE RECONCILING THE EXCEPTION MODEL ENACTED BY TURKISH PENAL CODE ARTICLE 34/2 WITH PRINCIPLE OF FAULT. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 1–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/118079

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. ALACAKAPTAN, Uğur, Sarhoşluk Hâlinde İşlenen Suçlarda Cezaî Mesuliyet, Ankara 1961.
  2. Ders., Suçun Unsurları, 2. Aufl., Ankara 1975
  3. ARTUK, Mehmet Emin/Gökcen, Ahmet/Yenidünya, Caner, Ceza Hukuku – Genel Hükümler, Band I, 3. Aufl., Ankara 2002
  4. BEMMANN, Günter, Welche Bedeutung hat das Erfordernis der Rauschtat im § 330a StGB?, GA 1961, S. 65-73
  5. BRUNS, Hans-Jürgen, Zur neuesten Rechtsprechung über die Strafbarkeit der Volltrunkenheit, JZ 1958, S. 105-111 BUCHAŁA, Kazimierz, Das Schuldprinzip und seine Funktion im polnischen Strafrecht, ZStW 106 (1994), S. 766-781
  6. CENTEL, Nur/Zafer, Hamide/Çakmut, Özlem, Türk Ceza Hukukuna Giriş, 3. Aufl., İstanbul 2005
  7. CRAMER, Peter, Anmerkung zum Urteil des Bundesgerichtshofs vom 24.11.1967 – 4 StR 500/67, JZ 1968, S. 273-276
  8. DEMIRBAŞ, Timur, Ceza Hukuku – Genel Hükümler, 3. Aufl., Ankara 2005
  9. DÖNMEZER, Sulhi/Erman, Sahir, Nazarî ve Tatbikî Ceza Hukuku, Band II, 12. Aufl., İstanbul 1999
  10. EISENBERG, Ulrich, Kriminologie, 6. Aufl., München 2005
  11. EREM, Faruk/Danışman, Ahmet/Artuk, Mehmet Emin, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 14. Aufl., Ankara 1997
  12. ESSER, Josef, Wert und Bedeutung der Rechtsfiktionen, 2. Aufl., Frankfurt am Main 1969
  13. GÖPPINGER, Hans, Kriminologie, 5. Aufl., München 1997
  14. GROPP, Walter, Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 4. Aufl., Berlin/Heildelberg 2005
  15. HAKERI, Hakan, Yeni Türk Ceza Hukukunun Temel Kavramları, 3. Aufl., Ankara 2005
  16. HARDWIG, Werner, Der Vollrauschtatbestand, GA 1964, S. 140-151
  17. HEINITZ, Ernst, Anmerkung zum Beschluss des Bundesgerichtshofs vom 8.4.1957 – GSSt 3/56, JZ 1958, S. 175-176
  18. HENNIG, Albrecht, Vollrausch, in: Hettinger, Michael (Hrsg), Reform des Sanktionenrechts, Band 1: Alkohol als Strafmilderungsgrund, Vollrausch, Actio libera in causa, Baden-Baden 2001, S. 97-187
  19. HORN, Eckhard, Actio libera in causa – eine notwendige, eine zulässige Rechtsfigur?, GA 1969, S. 289-306
  20. HRUSCHKA, Joachim, Strafrecht nach logisch-analytischer Methode, 2. Aufl., Berlin/New York 1988
  21. Ders., Der Begriff der actio libera in causa und die Begründung ihrer Strafbarkeit – BGHSt 21, 381, JuS 1968, S. 554-559
  22. Ders., Methodenprobleme bei der Tatzurechnung trotz Schuldunfähigkeit des Täters, SchwZStr 90 (1974), S. 48-77
  23. Ders., Probleme der actio libera in causa heute, JZ 1989, S. 310-316
  24. Ders., Die actio libera in causa – speziell bei § 20 StGB mit zwei Vorschlägen für die Gesetzgebung, JZ 1996, S. 64-72
  25. Ders., Die actio libera in causa bei Vorsatztaten und bei Fahrlässigkeitstaten, JZ 1997, S. 22-27
  26. ISFEN, Osman, Das Schuldprinz