SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

THE EFFECT OF HİGH SCHOOLS, ONPREMİSE ALCOHOL OUTLETS, AND COFFEEHOUSES ON CRİME ON STREET BLOCKS - BURSA EXAMPLE

LİSELERİN, İÇKİLİ YERLERİN VE KAHVEHANELERİN SOKAK ÜZERİNDE OLUŞAN SUÇA ETKİSİ – BURSA ÖRNEĞİ

Hacı DURU
Pages
25–129
Publication Date
2016-08-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, the unexpected interrelationships among social disorganization variables imply that social disorganization theory should be re-theorized for Turkey

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effects of high schools, on-premise alcohol outlets, and coffee-houses are examined based on an integration of crime opportunity and social disorganization theories.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data coming from Bursa Police Department and Turkish Statistics Institute are analyzed using hierarchical linear modeling techniques.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, the unexpected interrelationships among social disorganization variables imply that social disorganization theory should be re-theorized for Turkey
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:liseler · içkili yerler · kahvehaneler

Abstract

In this study, the effects of high schools, on-premise alcohol outlets, and coffee-houses are examined based on an integration of crime opportunity and social disorganization theories. Data coming from Bursa Police Department and Turkish Statistics Institute are analyzed using hierarchical linear modeling techniques. The results of the study show that controlling for possible third variables, street blocks with high schools, on-premise alcohol outlets, and coffeehouses host more crime than other street blocks. Moreover, the unexpected interrelationships among social disorganization variables imply that social disorganization theory should be re-theorized for Turkey

Özet

Çalışmada, rutin aktivite, suç örüntüsü ve sosyal düzensizlik teorilerinin birleşiminden oluşan bir modele dayanılarak liselerin, içkili yerlerin ve kahvehanelerin sokak blokları üzerinde oluşan suça etkisi incelenmektedir. Bursa Emniyet Müdürlüğü ve Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu’ndan elde edilen veriler hiyerarşik lineer modelleme tekniği kullanılarak regresyon analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Çalışma sonuçları, muhtemel üçüncü değişkenlerin etkileri de kontrol edildiği halde, üzerinde lise, içkili yer ve kahvehane bulunan sokak bloklarında daha fazla suç oluştuğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, sosyal düzensizlik teorisiyle ilişkili değişkenlerin birbirleriyle olan beklenmedik ilişkileri sosyal düzensizlik teorisinin Türkiye ortamı için yeniden üretilmesi gerektiğine işaret etmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

DURU, H. (2016). THE EFFECT OF HİGH SCHOOLS, ONPREMİSE ALCOHOL OUTLETS, AND COFFEEHOUSES ON CRİME ON STREET BLOCKS - BURSA EXAMPLE. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 25–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/118041

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Alaniz, M. L., Cartmill, R. S., ve Parker, R. N. (1998). Immigrants and violence: The importance of neighborhood context. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 20(2), 155-174.
  2. Anderson, A. L. (2002). Individual and contextual influences on delinquency: The role of the single parent family. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 575-587.
  3. Andresen, M. A. (2006). Crime measures and the spatial analysis of criminal activity. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 258285. Bachman, R. (1991). An analysifs of American Indian homicide: A test of social disorganization and economic deprivation at the reservation county level. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28(4), 456-471.
  4. Barnett, C.,ve Mencken, F. C. (2002).Social disorganization theory and the contextual nature of crime in nonmetropolitan counties. Rural Sociology, 67(3), 372-393.
  5. Basibuyuk, O. (2008). Social (Dis)organization and Terror Related Crimes in Turkey. University of North Texas. Blalock, H. M. (1960). Social statistics (Vol. 1221). New York: McGraw-Hill. Bellair, P. E. (1997). Social interaction and community crime: Examining the importance of neighbor networks. Criminology, 35(4), 677-704.
  6. Bernasco, W.,ve Block, R. (2009). Where offenders choose to attack: A discrete choice model of robberies in Chicago. Criminology, 47(1), 93-130.
  7. Bernasco, W.,ve Luykx, F. (2003).Effects of attractiveness, opportunity and accessibility to burglars on residential burglary rates of urban neighborhoods. Criminology, 41(3), 981-1002.
  8. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., ve Farrington, D. P. (1988). Criminal career research: Its value for criminology. Criminology, 26(1), 1-35.
  9. Brantingham, P. L., ve Brantingham, P. J. (1993). Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(1), 328. Brantingham, P. L., ve Brantingham, P. J. (1995). Criminality of place: Crime generators and crime attractors. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3(3), 1-26.
  10. Brantingham, P. L., ve Brantingham, P. J. (1999). A theoretical model of crime hot spot generation. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 8(1), 7-26.
  11. Brantingham, P. L., ve Brantingham, P. J. (2003).Anticipating the displacement of crime using the principles of environmental criminology. Crime Prevention Studies, 16, 119-148.
  12. Bursik, R. J. (1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects. Criminology, 26(4), 519-551.
  13. Bursik, R. J., ve Grasmick, H