SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Sayı: 33

THE CONTRIBUTION OF SOCIO CULTURAL INFLUENCE TO STUDENTS’ SELF EFFICACY

SOSYO KÜLTÜREL ETKİNİN ÖĞRENCİLERİN ÖZ- YETERLİLİK İNANCINA ETKİSİ

Nurcan Kahraman
Pages
14–24
Publication Date
2012-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results demonstrated that the elementary students, who perceive the importance of self improvement, perceive mastery goals, from their parents and teachers tend to have high self efficacy in science.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to investigate how well socio cultural influence (perceived parents’ achievement goals, and perceived teachers’ achievement goals) predict elementary students’ self efficacy in science.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, Perceived Parent Goal Emphases Scale, and Perceived Teacher Goal Emphases Scale were administered to 977 elementary school students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results demonstrated that the elementary students, who perceive the importance of self improvement, perceive mastery goals, from their parents and teachers tend to have high self efficacy in science.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Özyeterlilik · sosyo kültürel etki · fen

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate how well socio cultural influence (perceived parents’ achievement goals, and perceived teachers’ achievement goals) predict elementary students’ self efficacy in science. Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, Perceived Parent Goal Emphases Scale, and Perceived Teacher Goal Emphases Scale were administered to 977 elementary school students. Results demonstrated that the elementary students, who perceive the importance of self improvement, perceive mastery goals, from their parents and teachers tend to have high self efficacy in science.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı sosyo kültürel etkinin, öğretmenlerden ve ailelerden algılanan hedef yöneliminin, ilköğretim öğrencilerinin Fen ve Teknoloji dersindeki öz yeterlilik inançlarına olan etkisini araştırmaktır. Bu amaçla, 977 ilköğretim öğrencisine Öğrenmede Güdüsel Stratejiler Anketi, Ailelerden Algılanan Hedefler Anketi, ve Öğretmenlerden Algılanan Hedefler Anketi uygulanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre, ailelerinden ve öğretmenlerinden Fen ve Teknoloji dersinde bireysel gelişimin önemini, yani ustalık hedeflerini algılayan öğrenciler daha yüksek öz yeterlilik inancına sahip olmaktadırlar.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kahraman, N. (2012). THE CONTRIBUTION OF SOCIO CULTURAL INFLUENCE TO STUDENTS’ SELF EFFICACY. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 33, 14–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/117904

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Student’s learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (3), 260– 267. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
  2. Anderman, E.M., & Maehr, M.L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64, 287-309.
  3. Anderman, E.M. & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology,22, 269-298.
  4. Anderman, E.M. (2001). Learning to value mathematics and reading: relations to mastery and performance-oriented instructional practices. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 76-95.
  5. Anderman, E.M. & Urdan, T. & Roeser, R. (2003). The patterns of adaptive learning survey: History, development, and psychometric properties. For Indicators of Positive Development Conference, March 12-13, 2003
  6. Anderman, E. R., & Midgley, C. (2004). Changes in self-reported academic cheating across the transition from middle school to high school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 499-517.
  7. Anderman, L.H. & Anderman, E.M. (1999). Social predictors of changes in students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 21-37.
  8. Bandura, A., & Adams, N.E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(4), 287-310.
  9. Bandura, A. & Shunk (1981). Cultivating competence, self-Efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586-598.
  10. Baundra, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37 (2). 122- 147. Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5), 1017- 1028 Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development an functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
  11. Bandura, A. (1999). A sociocognitive analysis of substance abuse: An agentic perspective. Psychological Science, 10(3), 214-217.
  12. Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 21-41.
  13. Bandura, A., & Locke, E.A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(