SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1

AI-Generated STEM Activities: The Impact of the Activities on the Scientific Creativity of Gifted Students

Yapay Zeka ile Geliştirilen STEM Etkinlikleri: Özel Yetenekli Öğrenciler için Önerilen Etkinliklerin Bilimsel Yaratıcılıkları Üzerine Etkisi

Sema Nur Doğan(Bursa Osmangazi Science and Art Center)0000-0002-7075-0291
Nurcan Kahraman(ULUDAG UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF EDUCATION)0000-0003-1009-3047
Pages
312–343
Publication Date
2025-06-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study highlights the potential of artificial intelligence in designing STEM activities and offers a new approach to develop students' scientific creative thinking skills.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to answer the questions: "Does the implementation of AI-generated STEM activities have an impact on students' levels of scientific creativity?" and "What are the students' views and experiences regarding AI- generated STEM activities?".
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consists of 49 gifted 4th-grade students enrolled in a Science and Art Center in Bursa, Turkey during the 2023-2024 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study highlights the potential of artificial intelligence in designing STEM activities and offers a new approach to develop students' scientific creative thinking skills.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2023-2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yapay zeka · STEM · özel yetenekli öğrenciler

Abstract

This study aims to answer the questions: "Does the implementation of AI-generated STEM activities have an impact on students' levels of scientific creativity?" and "What are the students' views and experiences regarding AI- generated STEM activities?". The study group consists of 49 gifted 4th-grade students enrolled in a Science and Art Center in Bursa, Turkey during the 2023-2024 academic year. Utilizing a case study analysis, the research demonstrates that AI-generated STEM activities significantly enhance students' scientific creativity levels. Additionally, most students expressed positive views about the activities and stated that they developed their creativity, gained various skills and felt like engineers due to their involvement in design. The "Scientific Creativity Scale," adapted for use in Turkish context by Aktamış (2007), and a semi-structured interview form were employed in the research. This study highlights the potential of artificial intelligence in designing STEM activities and offers a new approach to develop students' scientific creative thinking skills.

Özet

Bu çalışma, "Yapay zeka tarafından oluşturulan STEM etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin bilimsel yaratıcılık düzeyleri üzerinde bir etkisi var mıdır?" ve "Öğrencilerin yapay zeka tarafından üretilen STEM etkinliklerine ilişkin görüşleri ve deneyimleri nelerdir?" sorularına yanıt aramaktadır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu, 2023-2024 eğitim-öğretim yılında Bursa’daki bir Bilim ve Sanat Merkezi’ne devam eden 49 özel yetenekli 4. sınıf öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Durum çalışması deseninin kullanıldığı bu araştırmada, yapay zeka tarafından geliştirilen STEM etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin bilimsel yaratıcılık düzeylerini anlamlı ölçüde artırdığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, öğrencilerin büyük bir çoğunluğu etkinliklere ilişkin olumlu görüşler bildirmiş, yaratıcılıklarının geliştiğini, çeşitli beceriler kazandıklarını ve tasarım sürecine dahil olmaları sebebiyle kendilerini mühendis gibi hissettiklerini ifade etmiştir. Araştırmada, Türkçeye Aktamış (2007) tarafından uyarlanan "Bilimsel Yaratıcılık Ölçeği" ile yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışma, yapay zekânın STEM etkinliklerinin tasarımındaki potansiyelini ortaya koymakta ve öğrencilerin bilimsel yaratıcı düşünme becerilerinin geliştirilmesine yönelik yeni bir yaklaşım sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Doğan, S. N., Kahraman, N. (2025). AI-Generated STEM Activities: The Impact of the Activities on the Scientific Creativity of Gifted Students. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1, 312–343. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1650454

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (64)

  1. Aktamış, H., & Ergin, Ö. (2006). Fen eğitimi ve yaratıcılık. Dokuz Eylül University The Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 20, 77-83. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/deubefd/issue/25440/268422
  2. Aktamış, H. (2007). The effects of scientific process skills on scientific creativity: the example of primary school seventh grade physics ( Publication No. 211593) [Doctoral dissertation, Dokuz Eylül University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  3. Althuwaybi, A. (2020). The importance of planning intellectually challenging tasks. Educational Considerations, 45(3), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.4148/0146-9282.2222
  4. Alabdulhadi, A. & Faisal, M. (2021). Systematic literature review of STEM self-study related ITSs. Education and Information Technologies. 26. 1-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10315-z
  5. Arnett, T. (2016). Teaching in the machine age: how innovation can make bad teachers good and good teachers better. Christensen Institute. https://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Teaching-in-the-machine-age.pdf
  6. Arslan, K. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Applicatıons in Education. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(1), 71-88. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1174773
  7. Asal, R. (2020). The effect of engineering design based science teaching on primary school 4th grade students scientific creativity and critical thinking skills (Publication no. 615878) [Master’s thesis, Gazi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  8. Asal Özkan, R., & Sarıkaya, R. (2023). The effect of science teaching with engineering design-based activities on scientific creativity of fourth grade students. Dokuz Eylül University The Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 55, 154-167. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1208412
  9. Ateş, H., & Sungur Gül, K. (2023). Investigation of self-efficacy and concern levels of pre-service teachers about STEM education. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 21(1), 478-504. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1211730
  10. Baltacı, R. (2016). Üstün yetenekli öğrenciler için bireyselleştirilmiş eğitim planı geliştirme. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 3(1), 33-41. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/516548
  11. Barkoczi, N., Maier, M. L., & Horvat-Marc, A. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on personalized learning in STEM education. In INTED2024 Proceedings (pp. 4980-4989). 18th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, Spain. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2024.1289
  12. Bıçakçı, M., & Baloğlu, M. (2018). Creativity in research with gifted samples in Turkey. Inönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 19(3), 327-343. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.481895
  13. Bi, H., Mi, S., Lu, S., & Hu, X. (2020). Meta-analysis of interventions and their effectiveness in students’ scientific creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100750
  14. Camcı Erdoğan, S. (2014). The effect of differentiated science and technology instruction based on scientific creativity on gifted and talented students' achievement, attitude and creativity (Publication No. 356630) [Doctoral dissertation, İstanbul University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  15. Cevher, A. H. (2023). An analysis of the studies in the field of scientific creativity of the gifted. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 14(5), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1304613
  16. Cevher Kılıç, V. (2015). An evaluation over unavailable education programme policy for gifted and talented children in Turkey. Education and Society in the 21st Century, 4(12), 145-154. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/egitimvetoplum/issue/32107/355913
  17. Chang, Y. S., Wang, Y. Y., & Ku, Y. T. (2023). Influence of online STEAM hands-on learning on AI learning, creativity, and creative emotions. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2205898
  18. OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT [Large language model]. https://chatgpt.com/
  19. Colton S., & Steel G. (1999).Artificial intellegence and scientific creativity. Artif Intell Study Behavior Q.102. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=19486f14275828ed0e5d8a298f9f9214dcbce603
  20. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
  21. Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444–452. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
  22. Çelik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H. & Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial ıntelligence for teachers: a systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66(4), 696–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
  23. Ercan Yalman, F., & Çepni, S. (2021). Self-assessments of gifted students on scientific creativity and scientific problem solving. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 18(1), 852-881. https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.938725
  24. Eroğlu, S., & Bektaş, O. (2022). The effect of 5E-based STEM education on academic achievement, scientific creativity, and views on the nature of science. Learning and Individual Differences, 98, Article 102181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102181
  25. Frankel, J & Wallen, N (2016). How to design and evaluate research to design and evaluate research in education (12th ed.) McGraw Hill.
  26. George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0. Pearson.
  27. Hebebci, M. T. (2023). Artificial intelligence in STEM education: New paths to learning. Technology and Education, 243. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376397009_Artificial_Intelligence_in_STEM_Education_New_Paths_to_Learning
  28. Hennessey, B. A. (2004). Developing creativity in gifted children: The central importance of motivation and classroom climate. http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/nrcgt/hennesse.html
  29. Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912
  30. Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, Article 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
  31. İşler, B., & Kılıç, M. (2021). The use and development of artificial intelligence in education. e-Journal of New Media, 5(1), 1-11. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1106175
  32. Jang, J., Jeon, J., & Jung, S. K. (2022). Development of STEM-based AI education program for sustainable improvement of elementary learners. Sustainability, 14(22), 15178. https://www.x-mol.com/paper/1696187726389071872
  33. Kale, E., (2010). Impacts of internal factors in organizations on innovation and creativity performance in hospitality companies (Publication no. 270831) [Doctoral dissertation, Erciyes University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  34. Kaplan Sayı, A. (2021). STEM eğitiminde yaratıcılık. In H. Nuhoğlu (Ed.), Eğitimcinin STEM öğrenme yolculuğu (1 st., pp. 323-352). Pegem Akademi.
  35. Karsenti, T., Bugmann, J., & Parent, S. (2019). Can students learn history by playing Assassin’s Creed? An exploratory study of 329 high school students. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332057397_Can_students_learn_history_by_playing_Assassin's_Creed_An_exploratory_study_of_329_high_school_students
  36. Kaya, N. G., & Mertol, H. (2022). The importance of technology in the education of gifted in the context of 21st century skills. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 10(19), 18- 25. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1061877
  37. Keser, F. F., & Kalender, S. (2016). Determining the opinions of gifted students about science. HAYEF Journal of Education, 13(1), 95-105. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iuhayefd/issue/26897/282782
  38. Kong, S. C., Ogata, H., Shih, J.-L., & Biswas, G. (2021). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in STEM Education. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2021) (Vol. II, pp. 774-776). International Academic Conferences. https://icce2021.apsce.net/
  39. Körpeoğlu, S. G., & Yıldız, S. G. (2024). Using artificial intelligence to predict students’ STEM attitudes: An adaptive neural-network-based fuzzy logic model. International Journal of Science Education, 46(10), 1001-1026. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375127588_Using_artificial_intelligence_to_predict_students'_STEM_attitudes_an_adaptive_neural-network-based_fuzzy_logic_model
  40. Kutru, Ç., & Hasançebi, F. (2024). The effect of Argumentation-Based Inquiry (ABI) supported STEM education on 7th grade students' communication, scientific creativity and problem solving skills with critical thinking disposition. Dokuz Eylül University The Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, (59), 139-175. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1336324
  41. Lin, C.-H., Yu, C.-C., Shih, P.-K. & Wu, L.-Y. (2021). STEM-based Artificial Intelligence learning in general education for non-engineering undergraduate students. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 224–237. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032867
  42. Linn, M. C., Donnelly-Hermosillo, D., & Gerard, L. (2023). Synergies between learning technologies and learning sciences: Promoting equitable secondary school teaching. Handbook of Research on Science Education, 3, 447-498. Taylor and Francis.
  43. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed. An argument for AI in education. Pearson. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299561597_Intelligence_Unleashed_An_argument_for_AI_in_Education
  44. Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook, (2nd ed). Sage.
  45. Mon, C. C., Dali, M. H., & Sam, L. C. (2016). Implementation of lesson study as an innovative professional development model among malaysian school teachers. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 13(1), 83-111. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304955648_Implementation_of_Lesson_Study_as_an_Innovative_Professional_Development_Model_Among_Malaysian_School_Teachers
  46. Philips, K. (2019). Teaching the student. Salem Press Encyclopedia.
  47. Rasul, M. S., Zahriman, N., Halim, L., & Rauf, R. A. (2018). Impact of integrated STEM smart communities program on students scientific creativity. Journal of Engineering Science Technology, 13, 80-89. https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/i-Cite%202018/i-Cite_10.pdf
  48. Renzulli, J. S. (2013). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence. Creative Learning Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355080432_The_Schoolwide_Enrichment_Model_A_How-to_Guide_for_Talent_Development
  49. Sarıçam, U. (2019). The effects of digital game-based STEM activities on students' interest in STEM fields and scientific creativity: Minecraft case (Publication no.569080) [Master’s thesis, Marmara University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  50. Siew, N. M., & Ambo, N.(2018). Development and evaluation of an integrated project based and stem teaching and learning module on enhancing scientific creativity among fifth graders. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 1017. https://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol17/1017-1033.Siew_JBSE_Vol.17_No.6.pdf
  51. Skowronek, M., Gilberti, R. M., Petro, M., Sancomb, C., Maddern, S., & Jankovic, J. (2022). Inclusive STEAM education in diverse disciplines of sustainable energy and AI. Energy and AI, 7, Article 100124. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666546821000720
  52. Sun, F. Y., Tian, P. Y., Sun, D. E., Fan, Y. H., & Yang, Y. Q. (2024). Pre-service teachers' inclination to integrate AI into STEM education: Analysis of influencing factors. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(6), 2574–2596. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13469
  53. Triplett, W. J. (2023). Artificial intelligence in STEM education. Cybersecurity and Innovation Technology Journal, 1(1), 23-29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374410329_Artificial_Intelligence_in_STEM_Education
  54. Uğraş, M. (2018). The effect of STEM activities on STEM attitudes, scientific creativity and motivation beliefs of the students and their views on STEM education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(5), 165-182. https://iojes.net/Makaleler/20326b8f-f86a-41e4-93c4-15b83293067b.pdf
  55. Uğraş, H., Uğraş, M., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2024). Innovative early childhood STEM education with ChatGPT: Teacher perspectives. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09804-8
  56. Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2014). Adaptive intelligent support to improve peer tutoring in algebra. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(1), 33–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-013-0001-9
  57. Woolf, B. P., Lane, H. C., Chaudhri, V., & Kolodner, J. (2013). AI grand challenges for education. AI Magazine, 34(4), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v34i4.2490
  58. Xu, W., & Ouyang, F. (2022). The application of AI technologies in STEM education: a systematic review from 2011 to 2021. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(59). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00377-5
  59. Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
  60. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (6. baskı). Seçkin.
  61. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
  62. Zhai, X. M., Neumann, K., & Krajcik, J. (2023). Editorial: AI for tackling STEM education challenges. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1183030. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1183030
  63. Zhang, L., Lin, Y., & Oon, P. T. (2024). The implementation of engineering design-based STEM learning and its impact on primary students' scientific creativity. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1(10). https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2024.2309907
  64. Alabdulhadi, A. & Faisal, M. (2021). Systematic literature review of STEM self-study related ITSs. Education and Information Technologies. 26. 1-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10315-z