SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1

THE IMPACT OF MOTIVATED CONSUMER INNOVATIVENESS ON THE ADOPTION OF FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES

GÜDÜLENMİŞ TÜKETİCİ YENİLİKÇİLİĞİNİN FİNANSAL TEKNOLOJİLERİN BENİMSENME DURUMU ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Gözde Karabilal(KARABÜK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0002-1992-4636
Mustafa Halid Karaarslan(Karabük Üniversitesi)0000-0003-2130-5076
Pages
1740–1756
Publication Date
2026-09-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained from the analyses, it was found that the hedonic dimension of motivated consumer innovativeness positively affects spending-oriented technologies, while negatively affecting savings-oriented technologies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The primary objective of this study is to examine the adoption behavior of financial technology (fintech) tools within the framework of motivated consumer innovativeness and opinion leadership theories.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The fundamental requirement of the research is based on the problem of why financial discipline tools, such as budget management, have low adoption rates while spending-oriented financial tools are rapidly becoming widespread.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained from the analyses, it was found that the hedonic dimension of motivated consumer innovativeness positively affects spending-oriented technologies, while negatively affecting savings-oriented technologies.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:finansal teknolojiler · güdülenmiş tüketici yenilikçiliği · fikir liderliği

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to examine the adoption behavior of financial technology (fintech) tools within the framework of motivated consumer innovativeness and opinion leadership theories. Within this scope, the theoretical model of the study was developed by reviewing domestic and international literature on the usage dynamics of fintech tools. The fundamental requirement of the research is based on the problem of why financial discipline tools, such as budget management, have low adoption rates while spending-oriented financial tools are rapidly becoming widespread. The universe of the research consists of digital financial service users throughout Turkey. A survey was used as the data collection technique in the research. The sample of the research consists of 401 participants. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the research model and test the hypotheses. The data were analyzed using the SPSS v.25.0 statistical program. According to the results obtained from the analyses, it was found that the hedonic dimension of motivated consumer innovativeness positively affects spending-oriented technologies, while negatively affecting savings-oriented technologies. This finding reveals that hedonistic motivations and the pursuit of social status play a dominant role in the adoption process of fintech tools, rather than rational benefits.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, finansal teknoloji (fintek) araçlarını benimseme davranışlarını güdülenmiş tüketici yenilikçiliği ve fikir liderliği teorileri çerçevesinde incelemektir. Bu kapsamda yerli ve yabancı literatür taranarak fintek araçlarının kullanım dinamikleri üzerine araştırmanın teorik modeli oluşturulmuştur. Araştırmanın temel gereksinimi, harcama odaklı finansal araçlar hızla yaygınlaşırken, bütçe yönetimi gibi finansal disiplin araçlarının neden düşük benimsenme oranına sahip olduğu sorunsalına dayanmaktadır. Araştırmanın evrenini Türkiye genelindeki dijital finansal hizmet kullanıcıları oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama tekniği olarak anket kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemi 401 katılımcıdan oluşmaktadır. Araştırma modelinin analiz edilmesinde ve hipotezlerin test edilmesinde lojistik regresyon analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Veriler SPSS v.25.0 istatistik programı kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan analizlerden elde edilen sonuçlara göre, güdülenmiş tüketici yenilikçiliğinin hazcı boyutunun harcama odaklı teknolojileri pozitif yönde etkilediği, buna karşın tasarruf odaklı teknolojileri negatif yönde etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen bu sonuca göre, fintek araçlarının benimsenme sürecinde rasyonel faydadan ziyade hedonik motivasyonların ve sosyal statü arayışının baskın bir rol oynadığını ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karabilal, G., Karaarslan, M. H. (2026). THE IMPACT OF MOTIVATED CONSUMER INNOVATIVENESS ON THE ADOPTION OF FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1, 1740–1756. https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.1906107

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (45)

  1. Akdevelioğlu, D. & Kara, S. (2020). An international investigation of opinion leadership and social media. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 14(1), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-12-2018-0158
  2. Aktuğ, S. (2020). Development of fintech sector in Turkey. BİLTÜRK Ekonomi ve İlişkili Çalışmalar Dergisi, 2(3), 487-499.
  3. Anifa, M., Ramakrishnan, S., Joghee, S., Kabiraj, S. & Bishnoi, M. (2022). Fintech innovations in the financial service industry. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(7), 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15070287
  4. Aybek, E. & Toraman, Ç. (2022). How many response categories are sufficient for Likert type scales? An empirical study based on the Item Response Theory. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(3), 723-737. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1132931
  5. Baliker, C., Baza, M., Alourani, A., Alshehri, A., Alshahrani, H. & Choo, K. (2024). On the applications of blockchain in FinTech: Advancements and opportunities. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 6338-6355. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2022.3231057
  6. Bayram, O., Talay, I. & Feridun, M. (2022). Can fintech promote sustainable finance? Policy lessons from the case of Turkey. Sustainability, 14(19), 12414. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912414
  7. Belbağ, A. G. & Yılmaz, K. G. (2017). Fikir liderliği, sosyal kimlik, ürün temelli yenilikçilik ve tüketici yenilikçiliği arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. ICPESS 2017 PROCEEDINGS Volume 3: Social Studies, 30.
  8. Choudhary, P. & Thenmozhi, M. (2024). Fintech and financial sector: ADO analysis and future research agenda. International Review of Financial Analysis, 93, 103201.
  9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  10. Ersoy, E. (2014). Tüketim aynasında “göz”e yansıyan seyirlik ve sembolik kimlikler. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Konferansları (Istanbul Journal of Sociological Studies), (49), 47-74.
  11. Flynn, L. R., Goldsmith, R. E. & Eastman, J. K. (1996). Opinion leaders and opinion seekers: Two new measurement scales. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(2), 137-147.
  12. George, D. & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (16th ed.). Routledge.
  13. Goldsmith, R. E. & Hofacker, C. F. (1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), 209-221.
  14. Grewal, R., Mehta, R. & Kardes, F. (2000). The role of the social-identity function of attitudes in consumer innovativeness and opinion leadership. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, 233-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-4870(00)00003-9
  15. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
  16. Hasan, M., Hoque, A., Abedin, M. Z. & Gasbarro, D. (2024). FinTech and sustainable development: A systematic thematic analysis using human- and machine-generated processing. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, 103473.
  17. Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92-101.
  18. Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 132-140.
  19. Hu, Z., Ding, S., Li, S., Chen, L. & Yang, S. (2019). Adoption intention of fintech services for bank users: An empirical examination with an extended technology acceptance model. Symmetry, 11(3), 340.
  20. Hua, X., Huang, Y. & Zheng, Y. (2019). Current practices, new insights, and emerging trends of financial technologies. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119, 1401-1410. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-08-2019-0431
  21. Kavak, B., Taner, N. & Kazancı, Ş. (2016). Yeniliği benimseyen kategorilerinin yenilikçi davranış güdüleri açısından farklılıkları: Akıllı telefon kullanıcıları üzerinde bir inceleme. Pazarlama Teorisi ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 2(2), 91-121.
  22. Kömürcüoğlu, Ö. (2025). The impact of FinTech on economic growth in Türkiye: A novel FinTech index approach. Journal of Economics and Management, 47, 543-568. https://doi.org/10.22367/jem.2025.47.20
  23. Lee, Y., Park, M. & Im, S. (2017). Distinguishing online opinion leaders: The mediating effect of consumer innovativeness and online opinion leadership for values and new product adoption behavior. Asia Marketing Journal, 19(2), 1-24.
  24. Leicht, T., Chtourou, A. & Youssef, K. B. (2018). Consumer innovativeness and intentioned autonomous car adoption. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(1), 1-11.
  25. Milian, E. Z., Spinola, M. D. M. & de Carvalho, M. M. (2019). Fintechs: A literature review and research agenda. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 34, 100833.
  26. Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  27. Papanikolaou, N., Boufounou, P. & Eriotis, N. (2025). Determinants of Fintech adoption: A systematic review integrating trust, security, and user perceptions within technology acceptance frameworks. In Cryptocurrencies - Innovations, Challenges, and Future Prospects. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1011799
  28. Renduchintala, T., Alfauri, H., Yang, Z., Di Pietro, R. & Jain, R. (2022). A survey of blockchain applications in the FinTech sector. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), 185.
  29. Roehrich, G. (2004). Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 671-677.
  30. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). The Free Press.
  31. Rzayeva, F. (2025). Finansal hizmetlerde teknoloji: 10 temel araç. Modern Sorunlar Bağlamında Bilim, Eğitim ve Yenilikler, 8(3), 28. https://doi.org/10.56334/sei/8.3.28
  32. Saeed, R., Zameer, H., Awan, I. & Ullah, I. (2014). A study of consumer innovativeness and motivations behind adoption of innovation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(7), 340.
  33. Sakarya, S. & Aksu, M. (2021). Fintech ecosystem in Turkey: An evaluation in terms of financial markets and financial stability. In S. B. Kahyaoğlu (Ed.), The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Governance, Economics and Finance (Vol. I, pp. 11-31). Springer, Singapore.
  34. Schindler, J. (2017). FinTech and financial innovation: Drivers and depth. BIS Quarterly Review, September.
  35. Schmitt, B. (1999). Experiential marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(1-3), 53-67.
  36. Seyed Esfahani, M. & Reynolds, N. (2021). Impact of consumer innovativeness on really new product adoption. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(4), 589-612.
  37. Sun, Y., Li, S. & Wang, R. (2022). Fintech: from budding to explosion - an overview of the current state of research. Review of Managerial Science, 17, 715-755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00513-5
  38. Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
  39. Taştan, M. (2019). Internet of things based smart energy management for smart home. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 13(6), 2751-2768.
  40. Tetik, C. (2018). Tüketici yenilikçiliğinin tüketicilerin internet alışverişine karşı tutumuna etkisi (Yayımlanmış yüksek lisans tezi). Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  41. Ulbrich, B. (2019). Revolutionizing the retail industry through integrated payments systems. In S. Chishti & T. Craddock (Eds.), The PayTech Book: The Payment Technology Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs and FinTech Visionaries (pp. 162-163). Wiley.
  42. Vandecasteele, B. & Geuens, M. (2010). Motivated consumer innovativeness: Concept, measurement, and validation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(4), 308-318.
  43. Yalçın, M. T., Çoban, Ö., Koçak, Ö. & İncedal, A. (2023). Dağıtımcı liderlik ve sosyal sermaye bağlamında örgütsel yenilikçilik. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(52), 687-705.
  44. Yazıcı, S. (2019). The analysis of fintech ecosystem in Turkey. Journal of Business, Economics and Finance, 8, 188-197. https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2019.1162
  45. Zhang, F., Sun, S., Liu, C. & Chang, V. (2020). Consumer innovativeness, product innovation and smart toys. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 41, 100974.