Journals / Milel ve Nihal / 2005 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Cook in the Kitchen and Eat in the Kitchen too: The Feminist Approach in the Contemporary Methodology of the History of Religions

Mutfakta Pişir Mutfakta Ye: Çağdaş Dinler Tarihi Metodolojisinde Feminist Yaklaşım

Pages
81–110
Publication Date
2005-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lastly, this approach wishes to question, review and -at need- to reconstruct the conventional methodologies of the History of Religions and the phenomena taken up by them in the past.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Feminist approach, one of the contemporary approaches of the History of Religions, has been a categorical model of some female historians of religions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to be fed, this model has three different sources, through which it gets generic conceptions; secular feminist movements, Christian feminist theologies and feminist anthropologies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lastly, this approach wishes to question, review and -at need- to reconstruct the conventional methodologies of the History of Religions and the phenomena taken up by them in the past.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cinsiyet · Feminizm · Feminist Yaklaşım

Abstract

The Feminist approach, one of the contemporary approaches of the History of Religions, has been a categorical model of some female historians of religions. In order to be fed, this model has three different sources, through which it gets generic conceptions; secular feminist movements, Christian feminist theologies and feminist anthropologies. This “new” approach gets the way of searching for the female divinities and the religious experience, roles, statues of female founders, priests or religious persons in their socio-cultural contexts. Lastly, this approach wishes to question, review and -at need- to reconstruct the conventional methodologies of the History of Religions and the phenomena taken up by them in the past.

Özet

Feminist yaklaşım, çağdaş Dinler Tarihi metodolojisi içinde özellikle bazı Bayan Dinler Tarihçilerin ayrı bir kategorik model olarak öne çıkardıkları çok yeni bir araştırma alanıdır. Bu yaklaşımın, seküler feminist hareketler, hıristiyan feminist teolojiler ve feminist antropolojiler gibi üç terminolojik ve kavramsal kaynağı bulunmakta olup, günümüzde disiplinin en etkili ve en eleştirel yaklaşımlarından birini oluşturmaktadır. Bu model, işlevsel açıdan başta dinlerdeki dişi tanrısal varlıklar olmak üzere kadın din kurucu ve liderleriyle, ruhban veya sıradan kadın dindarların tecrübelerini, onların rol ve statülerini baskın olarak araştırmak aynı zamanda geleneksel Dinler Tarihi metodolojisini sorgulayıp –gerektiği durumlarda- geçmişte ele alınan fenomenleri yeniden yapılandırmak istemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALICI, M. (2005). Cook in the Kitchen and Eat in the Kitchen too: The Feminist Approach in the Contemporary Methodology of the History of Religions. Milel ve Nihal, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 81–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/116058

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adkins, Lisa, Diana Leonard, ìReconstructing French Feminism: Commodification, Materialism and Sexî, Sex in Question, ed. Diana Leonard- Lisa Adkins, London 1996, 1-23. After Patriarchy: Feminist Transformations of the World Religions, ed. Paula M. Cooley, Wiliam R. Eakin, New York 1997.
  2. Alıcı, Mustafa, ìDinler Tarihiínde «ağdaş Metodolojik Problemlerî, Dinler Tarihinde Metodoloji Problemleri Tartışmalı İlmÓ İhtisas Toplantısı (İstanbul 25-26 Haziran 2004), (Basılmamış Tebliğ Metni), 1-44. _______, Uluslararası Dinler Tarihi Cemiyeti (IAHR)ínin Dinler Tarihi Metodolojisine Kurumsal Katkısı, Milel ve Nihal, 2 (1), 35-74.
  3. Boyarin, Daniel, ìGenderî, Critical Terms for Religious Studies, ed. Mark C. Taylor, Chicago- London 1998, 117-135.
  4. Carol, P. Christ, ìMircea Eliade and the Feminist Paradigm Shiftî, Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 1991(5/1), 75-94.
  5. Carr, Anne E., ìThe Scholarship of Gender: Womenís Studies and Religious Studiesî, Transforming Grace: Christian Tradition and Womenís Experience, San Francisco 1990, 63-94.
  6. Conn, H. M., ìFeminist Theologyî, New Dictionary of Theology, ed. Sinclair B. Ferguson,- David F. Wright, Leicester ñ Illinois 1996, 255-258. Constance H. Buchanan, ìWomenís Studiesî, Encyclopedia of Religion, ed Mircea Eliade, New York-London 1987, Vol. XV, 433-440.
  7. Edith, Franke, ʺFeministische Kritik an Wissenschaft und Religion.ʺ Kritik an Religionen. Religionswissenschaft und der kritische Umgang mit Religionen, ed. Gritt Maria Klinkhammer- Steffen Rink - Tobias Frick, Marburg 1997, 107-119.
  8. Delphy, Christine, ìRethinking Sex and Gender, Feminism in the Study of Religion, ed. Darlane M. Jushka, London - New York 2001, 11-23. Gender and Religion. On the Complexity of Symbols, ed. Caroline Walker Bynum, Paula Richman, Boston 1986.
  9. Gross, Rita M., Feminism and Religion: An Introduction, New York 1996. _______, ìMethodological Remarks on the Study of Women in Religion: Review, Critism and Redefinitionî, Women and Religion, ed. J. Plaskow- J. A. Romero, Missoula 1975, 153-165. _______, ìStudying Women And Religion: Conclusions Twenty-Five Years Laterî Todayís Woman in World Religions, ed. Arwin Sharma, Albany 1987, 327-361. _______, "Tribal Religions: Aboriginal Australia", Women in World Religions, ed. Arvind Sharma, Albany 1994, 39-44.
  10. Hampson, Daphne, Theology and Feminism, Oxford 1990.
  11. Hartmann, Heidi, ìThe Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Toward a More Progressive Union,î ed. Lydia Sargent, Women and Revolution: The Un