SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Transportation and Logistics / 2026 / Volume: 11 Issue: 1

Global Geopolitical Shifts and Türkiye’s Strategic Rise in The Belt and Road Initiative

Ayşegül Ketenci(ISTANBUL KULTUR UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-3165-7358
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-05-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal that escalating security risks and regional instabilities have rendered the Northern and Southern Corridors increasingly difficult to navigate, thereby enhancing the strategic significance of the Middle Corridor.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study analyses how global geopolitical developments have shaped the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and how these shifts have redefined Türkiye’s role within the Initiative.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings reveal that escalating security risks and regional instabilities have rendered the Northern and Southern Corridors increasingly difficult to navigate, thereby enhancing the strategic significance of the Middle Corridor.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study explains how the changing geopolitical context has strengthened Türkiye’s position in the Belt and Road Initiative, emphasizing its role as a critical bridge between Asia and Europe and a key player in the restructuring of global trade routes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Belt and Road Initiative · geopolitics · logistics

Abstract

This study analyses how global geopolitical developments have shaped the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and how these shifts have redefined Türkiye’s role within the Initiative. The findings reveal that escalating security risks and regional instabilities have rendered the Northern and Southern Corridors increasingly difficult to navigate, thereby enhancing the strategic significance of the Middle Corridor. Consequently, Türkiye’s position within the BRI has gained unprecedented importance, aligning with broader geopolitical transformations and evolving global trade dynamics. The study begins with a comprehensive assessment of the BRI, followed by an analysis of the geopolitical and economic ramifications of recent global developments. The shifting international order and its impact on China’s strategies are examined, with a particular emphasis on Türkiye-China relations within the framework of the BRI. The study highlights Türkiye’s geostrategic and logistical advantages, illustrating how its enhanced role in the initiative is a direct outcome of changing global power balances and trade realignments. As traditional trade corridors face mounting security and political challenges, Türkiye has emerged as a pivotal actor in facilitating transcontinental connectivity. This study explains how the changing geopolitical context has strengthened Türkiye’s position in the Belt and Road Initiative, emphasizing its role as a critical bridge between Asia and Europe and a key player in the restructuring of global trade routes.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ketenci, A. (2026). Global Geopolitical Shifts and Türkiye’s Strategic Rise in The Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, Volume: 11 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2026.1652540

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (43)

  1. Ahmadzada, S. (2024). Ukraine War Fuels Resurgence of Modern Silk Road https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2024/06/silk-road- war-ukraine?lang=en google scholar
  2. Akdağ, Z. (2019). Türkiye-Çin ilişkilerinde Kuşak ve Yol Girişiminin önemi, Birey ve Toplum Dergisi, 9(1), 65-96. https://doi.org/10.20493/birtop.558276 google scholar
  3. Akdemir, İ. O & İncili, Ö. F. (2024). Kuşak-Yol Projesi kimin için? Çin’e Karşı Türkiye, Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (34)12, 451-468. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.1375336 google scholar
  4. Alperen, Ü. (2024). Uygur sorununun Türkiye–Çin ilişkilerine etkisi, Furat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 34(2), 919-932. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.1423656 google scholar
  5. Atlı, A. (2018). Turkey as a Eurasian transport hub: prospects for inter-regional partnership, Perceptions, 23(2), 117-134. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/549671 google scholar
  6. Başaran, D. (2024). Importance of Middle Corridor in Belt and Road Initiative https://www.turkiyetoday.com/turkiye/the-importance-of-the-middle- corridor-in-the-belt-and-road-initiative-18087/ google scholar
  7. Brattberg, E. & Soula, E. (2018). Europe’s Emerging Approach to China’s Belt and Road Initiative, https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2018/10/europes-emerging-approach-to-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative?lang=en google scholar
  8. Campbell, C. (2017). China Says It’s Building the New Silk Road. Here Are Five Things to Know Ahead of a Key Summit, TIME, https://time.com/4776845/china-xi-jinping-belt-road-initiative-obor/ google scholar
  9. Canlı, Z. (2023). Rusya-Ukrayna Savaşı’nın İlk Yılında Türkiye’nin Orta Koridor’daki Konumu Güçlendi, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/rusya-ukrayna- savasinin-ilk-yilinda-turkiyenin-orta-koridordaki-konumu-guclendi/2828749 google scholar
  10. Change, A. (2016). American Perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative, Institute for China-America Studies, https://chinaus-icas.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/American-Perspectives-on-the-Belt-and-Road-Initiative.pdf google scholar
  11. Coşkun, Ö. İ., (2021). Bir Kuşak Bir Yol Projesi Bağlamında Türkiye-Çin İlişkisi, İhtisas Akademi. https://ihtisasakademi.tugva.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/BI%CC%87R-KUS%CC%A7AK-BI%CC%87R-YOL-PROJESI%CC%87-BAG%CC%86LAMINDA-TU%CC%88RKI%CC%87YE-C%CC%A7I%CC%87N-I%CC%87LI%CC%87S%CC%A7KI%CC%87SI%CC%87.pdf google scholar
  12. Çatal, S. (2019). Kuşak ve Yol İnisiyatifi’nin Türkiye’nin ekonomi güvenliğine etkileri, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (19), 101-124. google scholar
  13. Çelik, Y. (2021). Orta Asya için Kuşak ve Yol Projesinin stratejik sonuçları, Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 79-94. google scholar
  14. Çolakoğlu, S. (2023). The Middle Corridor and the Russia-Ukraine War: the Rise of New Regional Collaboration in Eurasia? https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13744-the-middle-corridor-and-the-russia-ukraine-war-the-rise-of-new-regional-collaboration-in- eurasia?.html=&utm google scholar
  15. Dabaakay, A. (2022). Mesto i rol’ Turtsii v ramkakh initsiativy «Odin poyas, odin put’». Problemy i vozmozhnosti, google scholar
  16. DİPAM. (2023). Türkiye-Çin Ekonomik İlişkilerinin Kapsamlı Analizi, https://dipam.org/wp- content/uploads/2023/08/Tu%CC%88rkiye-C%CC%A7in- Ekonomik-I%CC%87lis%CC%A7kilerinin-Kapsamli-Analizi.pdf google scholar
  17. Durdular, A. (2016). Çin’in ‘Kuşak-Yol’ Projesi ve Türkiye-Çin ilişkilerine etkisi, Avrasya Etüdleri, (49)1, 77-97. google scholar
  18. Ece, J. N, (2023). Bir Kuşak Bir Yol Projesi’nin Türkiye ve Türk Cumhuriyetleri açısından önemi, Mersin Üniversitesi Denizcilik ve Lojistik Araştırmaları Dergisi, (5)1, 38-56. google scholar
  19. Ergenç, C. & Göçer, D. (2023). China’s Response to Türkiye’s Volatile Authoritarianism, https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2023/05/chinas- response-to-turkiyes-volatile-authoritarianism?lang=en google scholar
  20. Ergüney, E. (2017). One Belt One Road Initiative: Perks and Challenges for Turkey, http://turkishpolicy.com/article/870/one-belt-one-road-initiative- perks-and-challenges-for-turkeygoogle scholar
  21. Flint,C. & Zhu, C. (2019). The geopolitics of connectivity, cooperation, and hegemonic competition: The Belt and Road Initiative, Geoforum, 95-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.12.008 google scholar
  22. Gilani, I. (2023). India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor: A Passage of Possibilities, https://frontline.thehindu.com/world-affairs/how-the-india- middle-east-europe-economic-corridor-opens-up-a-passage-of-possibilities/article67344064.ecegoogle scholar
  23. Guliyev, V. (2023). Middle Corridor: from Western-Initiated TRACECA to China’s Belt and Road Initiative, Baku Research Institute, https://bakuresearchinstitute.org/en/middle-corridor-from-western-initiated-traceca-to-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative/ google scholar
  24. Gülten, Z. T. (2023). The Impact of the Russia-Ukraine War on the Belt and Road Initiative, ANKASAM, https://www.ankasam.org/anka-analizler/the- impact-of-the-russia-ukraine-war-on-the-belt-and-road-initiative/?lang=en google scholar
  25. İkiz, A. (2019). Tek Kuşak Tek Yol Projesi ve Türkiye’ye olası etkileri, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(72), 1688-1700. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/834056 google scholar
  26. Koçakoğlu, M. A. (2021). Belt And Road Initiative and Turkey China relationships through soft power concept, OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(39), 750-776. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.831498 google scholar
  27. Koyuncu, M. C. (2022). A New Hope in the War of the Corridors: Middle Corridor or Rail Shield, ANKASAM, https://www.ankasam.org/a-new-hope-in- the-war-of-the-corridorsmid-lane-or-rail-shield/?lang=en google scholar
  28. Meltzer, J. (2017). China’s One Belt One Road initiative: A view from the United States, Brookings, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinas-one-belt- one-road-initiative-a-view-from-the-united-states/google scholar
  29. Nuroğlu, E. (2019). Kuşak-Yol projesi çerçevesinde Türkiye-Çin ilişkileri, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/analiz/kusak-yol-projesi-cercevesinde-turkiye-cin- iliskileri/1538112 google scholar
  30. Omonkulov, O. (2020). Kuşak ve Yol Projesi bağlamında Çin-Orta Asya ilişkileri, Bölgesel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4 (1), 45-115. google scholar
  31. Özçubukçu, M. G. (2024). Orta Koridor’un Önemi- Türkiye’nin Konumu Yükseliyor mu?, Türkiye Araştırmaları, https://turkiyearastirmalari.org/2024/06/09/yayinlar/analiz/orta-koridorun-onemi/ google scholar
  32. Peyrouse, S. (2017). The evolution of Russia’s views on the Belt and Road Initiative, Asia Policy, 24, 96-102. [suspicious link removed] google scholar
  33. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Türkiye’s Multilateral Transportation Policy, https://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkiye_s-multilateral- transportation-policy.en.mfa google scholar
  34. Seyidoğlu, H., Gönültaş, S. (2014). Modern İpek Yolu Projesi ve Türkiye ile Orta Asya Türk Cumhuriyetleri arasındaki ekonomik ilişkiler, Avrasya Etüdleri, (45), 201-216. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/422117 google scholar
  35. Şensoy, S. (2016). Bir Kuşak Bir Yol Çin Türkiye ve Dünya, TASAM, https://tasam.org/tr-TR/Icerik/25699/bir_kusak_bir_yol_cin_turkiye_ve_dunya google scholar
  36. Jinghon, T. & Kuzmin, V. A. (2021). Razvitiye kitaysko-turetskikh otnosheniy v ramkakhinitsiativy Odin poyas, odin put’, Nauchnyi Dialog, (3), 438-451. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2021-3-438-451. google scholar
  37. Towards a Joint Western alternative to the Belt and Road Initiative?, (2021). European Union Briefing, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/698824/EPRS_BRI%282021%29698824_EN.pdfgoogle scholar
  38. Tuerdi, R. (2020). Yeni İpek Yolu Projesi Ve Türkiye – Çin İşbirliğine Etkileri, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Dış Ticaret Enstitüsü Working Paper Studies https://ticaret.edu.tr/wp-content/uploads/2020/921/137%20YEN%C4%B0%20%C4%B0PEK%20YOLU%20PROJES%C4%B0%20VE%20T%C3%9CRK%C4%B0YE%20%20%C3%87%C4%B0N%20%C4%B0%C5%9EB%C4%B0RL%C4%B0%C4%9E%C4%B0NE.pdf google scholar
  39. Ülgen, S. & Umarov, T. (2024). Türkiye and the World Initiative- Transatlantic Policies on China: Is There a Role for Türkiye?, https://carnegie-production- assets.s3.amazonaws.com/static/files/Ulgen%20Umarov_Turkiye%20China-final.pdf google scholar
  40. World Bank. (2023). Middle Trade and Transport Corridor- Policies and Investments to Triple Freight Volumes and Halve Travel Time by 2023. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/6248f697aed4be0f770d319dcaa4ca52-0080062023/original/Middle-Trade-and- Transport-Corridor-World-Bank-FINAL.pdfgoogle scholar
  41. Yujun, F., Gabuev, A., Haenle, P., Bin, M., Trenin. (2019). The Belt and Road Initiative: Views from Washington, Moscow, and Beijing?,https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2019/04/the-belt-and-road-initiative-views-from-washington-moscow-and-beijing?lang=en google scholar
  42. Zhang, Z. (2018). The Belt and Road Initiative: China’s New Geopolitical Strategy?, Research Division Asia / BCAS, https://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/projekt_papiere/Zhang_BCAS_2018_BRI_China_7.pdf google scholar
  43. Zhao, M. (2021). The Belt and Road Initiative and China–US strategic competition, China International Strategy Review, 3, 248–260. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8576310/google scholar