SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 53

Technological Determinism and Singularity in Clarke & Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey

Clarke ve Kubrick’in 2001: Bir Uzay Destanı adlı eserinde Teknolojik Determinizm ve Tekillik

Cenk Tan(Pamukkale Üniversitesi)0000-0003-2451-3612
Pages
51–66
Publication Date
2025-06-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article concludes that Clarke and Kubrick signal the coming of the posthuman era.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Clarke and Stanley Kubrick’s timeless work of science fiction, 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) offers a visionary insight on various philosophical issues.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article discusses that 2001’s central focus fundamentally relies on technological determinism, leading to technological singularity and, eventually, a posthuman existence of the human race.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article concludes that Clarke and Kubrick signal the coming of the posthuman era.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:2001: Bir Uzay Destanı · Arthur C. Clarke · Stanley Kubrick

Abstract

Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick’s timeless work of science fiction, 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) offers a visionary insight on various philosophical issues. This article discusses that 2001’s central focus fundamentally relies on technological determinism, leading to technological singularity and, eventually, a posthuman existence of the human race. While outlining technological determinism, the article also sheds light on its relationship with associated key concepts such as normative phenomena, permissionless innovation and technocratic governing mentalities. These notions mainly reveal Clarke and Kubrick’s views of the universe, which are embedded in the subtext of the novel and the film. While comparing and contrasting the novel and the film, the study puts forward their similarities and differences. The theoretical framework explores technological determinism, singularity and posthumanism with references to various sources and the following section puts the novel/film in spotlight by demonstrating how and to what extent Clarke and Kubrick have manifested their ideas regarding technological determinism and singularity in this complex masterpiece contemplating the author’s and director’s unique extrapolations of humanity’s future. The article concludes that Clarke and Kubrick signal the coming of the posthuman era.

Özet

Arthur C. Clarke ve Stanley Kubrick'in zamansız bilimkurgu eseri 2001: Bir Uzay Destanı (1968), çeşitli felsefi konulara ilişkin vizyoner bir bakış açısı sunar. Bu makale, 2001'in odak noktasının, teknolojik determinizme dayandığını, bunun da teknolojik tekilliğe ve nihayetinde insan ırkının insan sonrası bir varoluşuna yol açtığını tartışmaktadır. Teknolojik determinizmi özetlerken, makale aynı zamanda normatif fenomenler, izinsiz yenilik ve teknokratik yönetim zihniyetleri gibi ilgili temel kavramlarla olan ilişkisine de ışık tutar. Bu kavramlar, Clarke ve Kubrick'in roman ve filmin alt metnine yerleştirilen evren görüşlerini ortaya koyar. Roman ve filmi karşılaştırıp ele alırken, çalışma bu iki eserin benzerliklerini ve farklılıklarını ortaya koyar. Teorik çerçeve, teknolojik determinizm, tekillik ve posthümanizmi çeşitli kaynaklara referansla incelerken, bir sonraki bölüm romanı/filmi odak noktası haline getirerek Clarke ve Kubrick'in teknolojik determinizm ve tekillik konusundaki fikirlerini bu karmaşık başyapıtta nasıl ve ne ölçüde ortaya koyduklarını gösterir. Bu çalışma, yazar ve yönetmenin insanlığın geleceğine dair benzersiz öngörülerini ele alır. Makale, Clarke ve Kubrick'in insan sonrası dönemin gelişine işaret ettikleri sonucuna varır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tan, C. (2025). Technological Determinism and Singularity in Clarke & Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey. Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 53, 51–66. https://doi.org/10.21497/sefad.1550512

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Abrams, J. (2007). Nietzsche’s overman as posthuman star child in 2001: A Space Odyssey. In J. Abrams (Ed.), The philosophy of Stanley Kubrick (pp. 247–266). Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
  2. Asimov, I., & Shulman, J. (1988). Isaac Asimov's book of science and nature quotations. New York: Blue Cliff Editions.
  3. Caracciolo, M. (2015). Bones in Outer Space: Narrative and the Cosmos in 2001: A Space Odyssey and Its Remediations. Image & Narrative, 16(3), 73–89. Retrieved from https://www.imageandnarrative.be/index.php/imagenarrative/article/view/904
  4. Chalmers, D. J. (2010). The singularity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17, 7-65.
  5. Clarke, A. C. (1968). 2001: A Space Odyssey. New York: Dutton.
  6. Clarke, A. C. (2011). Report on planet three. London: Hachette UK.
  7. Clarke, A. C., & Kubrick, S. (Writers), & Kubrick, S. (Director). (1968). 2001: A Space Odyssey [Motion picture]. United States: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.
  8. Dafoe, A. (2015). On technological determinism: A typology, scope conditions, and a mechanism. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 40(6), 1047-1076. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915579283
  9. Dotson, T. (2015). Technological determinism and permissionless innovation as technocratic governing mentalities: Psychocultural barriers to the democratization of technology. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 1, 98-120. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2015.26
  10. Feng, Q. (2022). Analysis of technological determinism and social constructionism. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 664, 1391-1394. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220504.252
  11. Goertzel, B. (2007). Human-level artificial general intelligence and the possibility of a technological singularity. Artificial Intelligence, 171(18), 1161-1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.10.012
  12. Haraway, D. J. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). New York, NY: Routledge.
  13. Haraway, D. J. (2004). The Haraway Reader. New York, NY: Routledge.
  14. Kolker, R. (2006). Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey: New essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
  15. Krämer, P. (2010). 2001: A Space Odyssey. London: BFI Publishing - Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. London: Penguin Books.
  17. Kurzweil, R. (2024). The Singularity is nearer: When we merge with AI. New York: Random House.
  18. Loren, S. (2008). Mechanical humanity, or how I learned to stop worrying and love the android: The posthuman subject in 2001: A Space Odyssey and Artificial Intelligence: A.I. In G. D. Rhodes (Ed.), Stanley Kubrick: Essays on his films and legacy (pp. 211-231). Jefferson: McFarland & Company.
  19. Papageorgiou, T., & Michaelides, P. G. (2013). Joseph Schumpeter and Thorstein Veblen on technological determinism, individualism, and institutions. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 23(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2013.750028
  20. Poole, R. (2018). The myth of progress: 2001 – A Space Odyssey. In Limiting outer space (pp. 103-129). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90227-7_6
  21. Potapov, A. (2018). Technological singularity: What do we really know? Information, 9(4), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/info9040082
  22. Sadowski, J., & Selinger, E. (2014). Creating a taxonomic tool for technocracy and applying it to Silicon Valley. Technology in Society, 38, 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.08.002
  23. Salles, R. (2013). Determinism, fatalism, and freedom in Stoic philosophy. In A. Bardon & H. Dyke (Eds.), A companion to the philosophy of time (pp. 59-72). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118592740.ch5
  24. Shanahan, M. (2015). The technological singularity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  25. Sims, C. A. (2013). Tech anxiety: Artificial intelligence and ontological awakening in four science fiction novels. Jefferson: McFarland & Company.
  26. Sirius, R. U., & Cornell, J. (2015). Transcendence: The disinformation encyclopedia of Transhumanism and the Singularity. San Francisco, CA: Disinformation Books.
  27. Smith, M. R., & Marx, L. (1994). Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  28. Thierer, A. (2014). Permissionless innovation: The continuing case for comprehensive technological freedom. Mercatus Center at George Mason University. Retrieved from https://www.mercatus.org/research/books/permissionless-innovation-continuing-case-comprehensive-technological-freedom
  29. Vacker, B. (2018). Specter of the monolith: Nihilism, information, and orbital power. Philadelphia: Center for Media and Destiny.
  30. Veblen, T. (2001). The engineers and the price system. Kitchener, Ontario: Batoche Books.
  31. Vinge, V. (2003). Technological singularity. The transhumanist reader, pp. 365-375. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118555927.ch35
  32. Wamberg, J. (2020). Monolith in a hollow: Paleofuturism and earth art in Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey. The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics, 29(59), 36-78. https://doi.org/10.7146/nja.v29i59.120470
  33. Wolfe, C. (2010). What is Posthumanism? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  34. Wyatt, S. (2008). Technological Determinism Is Dead; Long Live Technological Determinism. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, & M. Lynch (Eds.), The Handbook of Science & Technology Studies (pp. 165-181). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  35. Wyatt, S. (2023). Technological Determinism: What It Is and Why It Matters. In G. J. Robson & J. Y. Tsou (Eds.), Technology ethics: A philosophical introduction and readings (pp. 26-33). New York, NY: Routledge.