Journals / Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 1

Empirical Possibility of Belief

İnancın Deneyimsel Olanaklılığı

Pages
64–73
Publication Date
2016-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The basic claim of this paper consists of the following primary idea: Contrary to what is believed, neither experiences form a firm and certain basis for beliefs, nor experiences are in need of beliefs to be known.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, the relationship between belief and experience will be investigated because on the one hand, experience creates a source for beliefs which leads knowledge and on the other hand it makes the experience possible, which leads human actions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Considering the analysis of two prominent analytic philosophers Davidson and Wittgenstein, the relationship of belief and experience, and the questionable nature of this relationship will be studied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The basic claim of this paper consists of the following primary idea: Contrary to what is believed, neither experiences form a firm and certain basis for beliefs, nor experiences are in need of beliefs to be known.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Donald Davidson · Ludwig Wittgenstein · deneyim

Abstract

In this paper, the relationship between belief and experience will be investigated because on the one hand, experience creates a source for beliefs which leads knowledge and on the other hand it makes the experience possible, which leads human actions. Considering the analysis of two prominent analytic philosophers Davidson and Wittgenstein, the relationship of belief and experience, and the questionable nature of this relationship will be studied. The basic claim of this paper consists of the following primary idea: Contrary to what is believed, neither experiences form a firm and certain basis for beliefs, nor experiences are in need of beliefs to be known.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, bir yandan bilgiye yol açması bağlamında deneyimin inanca kaynak oluşturması, öte yandan insan edimlerine yol açması bağlamında inancın deneyimlenmesine olanak oluşturması nedeniyle inanç-deneyim ilişkisi irdelenecektir. İnanç-deneyim ilişkisinin olanaklılığı ve bu ilişkinin kuşkulu doğası, Davidson ve Wittgenstein gibi iki önde gelen çözümleyici filozofun konuyla ilgili açıklamaları dikkate alınarak araştırılmaktadır. Yazının ana savını şu temel fikir oluşturmaktadır: Sanılanın aksine, ne deneyimler inanç için sağlam ve kesin bir temel oluştururlar ne de deneyimler bilinmek için inançlara gereksinim duyarlar.

🔖

Cite This Article

Serin, F. N. (2016). Empirical Possibility of Belief. Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi, Sayı: 1, 64–73. https://ajindex.com/articles/1140280

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Davidson, Donald (1984). Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Clarendon Press: Oxford
  2. Davidson, Donald (1986) “A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge”. Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson içinde, (ed.) E. LePore. Blackwell: Oxford
  3. Davidson, Donald (2001).Essays on Actions and Events: Philosophical Essays, Clarendon Press: Oxford
  4. Davidson, Donald (2001). “Actions, Reasons and Causes”, Essays on Actions and Events: Philosophical Essays, Vol 1. içinde, Clarendon Press: Oxford
  5. Davidson, Donald; Suppes, Patrick; Siegel, Sidney (1957) Decision Making: An Experimental Approach. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA
  6. Gettier, Edmund L. (1963) “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?”, Analysis 23, s. 121- 123
  7. Moore, G. E. (1993) “Proof of an External World,”içinde G. E. Moore: Selected Writings, (ed.) Thomas Baldwin, Routledge: London
  8. Schantz, Richard (1999). “The Role of Sensory Experience in Epistemic Justification: A Problem for Coherentism”, Erkenntnis, Cilt. 50, No. 2/3, s.177-191
  9. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1993) Philosophical Grammar, çev. Anthony Kenny, Basil Blackwell: Oxford
  10. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2009) Kesinlik Üstüne – Kültür ve Değer, çev. D. Şahiner, Metis Yayınları: İstanbul