SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 5 Issue: 42

-

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Romantik İlişki İnançlarının Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Müzeyyen Küçükarslan
Cem Ali Gizir
Pages
—
Publication Date
2014-10-14
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lastly, when students’ romantic relationship experiences were taken into consideration, it was found that the students “experiencing a romantic relationship for the first time” were significantly more likely to have beliefs on love finds a way, one and only and idealization than the other three groups of students

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the present study is to determine whether there is a difference among university students’ romantic relationship beliefs in regard to gender, grade level and dating status.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample consisted of 957 (559 female, 398 male) undergraduate students attending a university during 20102011 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lastly, when students’ romantic relationship experiences were taken into consideration, it was found that the students “experiencing a romantic relationship for the first time” were significantly more likely to have beliefs on love finds a way, one and only and idealization than the other three groups of students
🔬Design:Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:romantic relationship · irrational romantic relationship beliefs · university students

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to determine whether there is a difference among university students’ romantic relationship beliefs in regard to gender, grade level and dating status. The sample consisted of 957 (559 female, 398 male) undergraduate students attending a university during 20102011 academic year. Two instruments, namely, “Demographic Data Form” and “Romantic Beliefs Scale” adapted to Turkish were used in the present study. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-test were used to analyze the data. The results of the study revealed that university student’ romantic relationship beliefs differed significantly in terms of gender, grade level and dating status. Specifically, males were significantly more likely to have beliefs about love finds a way and love at first sight than females. When grade level considered, it was observed that freshman and sophomore students have one and only and idealization beliefs more than the senior students. Lastly, when students’ romantic relationship experiences were taken into consideration, it was found that the students “experiencing a romantic relationship for the first time” were significantly more likely to have beliefs on love finds a way, one and only and idealization than the other three groups of students

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, üniversite öğrencilerinin romantik ilişkilere yönelik inançlarının cinsiyet, öğrenim gördükleri sınıf düzeyi ve romantik ilişki yaşama durumu değişkenlerine göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığını incelemektir. Araştırmanın örneklemini, 2010-2011 eğitim-öğretim yılında lisans düzeyinde öğrenim görmekte olan 957 (559 kız, 398 erkek) üniversite öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, veri toplama araçları olarak araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen “Kişisel Bilgi Formu” ile Türkçe’ye uyarlaması yapılan “Romantik İnançlar Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Araştırma verileri t-testi ve tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) teknikleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre, üniversite öğrencilerinin romantik ilişkilere yönelik inançları, cinsiyet, sınıf düzeyi ve romantik ilişki yaşama durumuna göre farklılık göstermiştir. Bulgular cinsiyet açısından ele alındığında, erkek öğrencilerin kızlara oranla romantik ilişkilere yönelik inançlar arasında yer alan aşk bir yol bulur ve ilk görüşte aşk inançlarına daha yüksek düzeyde sahip oldukları görülmüştür. Sınıf düzeyi dikkate alındığında ise birinci ve ikinci sınıf öğrencilerinin ilk ve tek ile idealleştirme inançlarının dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerine oranla daha yüksek düzeyde olduğu gözlenmiştir. Son olarak, romantik ilişki yaşama durumu açısından incelendiğinde, “daha önce yaşamayıp, şimdi romantik bir ilişki yaşayan” öğrencilerin aşk bir yol bulur, ilk ve tek ile idealleştirme inançlarının diğer gruplardaki öğrencilere göre daha yüksek düzeyde olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Küçükarslan, M., Gizir, C. A. (2014). -. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Volume: 5 Issue: 42. https://doi.org/10.17066/pdrd.71651

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (112)

  1. ilişkin tutumlar arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi.
  2. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Hacettepe
  3. Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara. Bradbury, T. N. ve Fincham, F. D. (1988). Individual
  4. difference variables in close relationships: A contextual
  5. model of marriage as an integrative framework.
  6. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 713-21. Can, S. (2006). Genç yetişkinlik döneminde bireylerin
  7. karşı cinsle duygusal ilişkilerindeki çatışma çözme
  8. biçimlerinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek
  9. Lisans Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler
  10. Family Issues, 33, 55-61. Collins, W. A. (2003). More than myth: The developmental
  11. significance of romantic relationship during
  12. adolescence. Journal of Reserach of Adolescence, 13, 1-24. Creasey, G. ve Ladd, A. (2004). Negative mood regulation
  13. expectancies and conflict behaviors in late adolescent
  14. college student romantic relationships: The moderating
  15. role of generalized attachment representations. Journal
  16. of Research on Adolescence, 14(2), 235–255. Creasey, G., Kershaw, K. ve Boston, A. (1999). Conflict
  17. management with friends and romantic partners: The
  18. role of attachment and negative mood regulation
  19. expectancies. The Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
  20. 28(5), 523-543. Davies, M. F. (2006). Irrational beliefs and unconditional
  21. self-acceptance: Correlational evidence linking two
  22. key features of REBT. Journal of Rational-Emotive
  23. and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 24(2), 113-124. DeBord, J., Romans, J. S.C. ve Krieshok, T. (1996).
  24. Predicting dyadic adjustment from general and
  25. relationship-specific beliefs. Journal of Psychology, 130, 263-280. Demir, M. (2008). Sweetheart, you really make me
  26. happy: Romantic relationship quality and personality
  27. as predictors of happiness among emerging adults.
  28. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 57–277. Eidelson, R. J. ve Epstein, N. (1982). Cognition and
  29. relationship maladjustment: Development of a
  30. measure of dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Journal
  31. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 715–720. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York:
  32. W.W. Norton ve Company, Inc. Feiring, C. (1996). Concepts of romance in 15-years-olds.
  33. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 181-200. Furman, W. (2002). The emerging field of adolescent
  34. romantic relationships. Current Directions in
  35. Psychological Science, 11, 177–180. Furman, W. ve Shaffer, L. A. (1999). A story of adolescence:
  36. The emergence of other-sex relationships. Journal of
  37. Youth and Adolescence, 28, 513–522. Florsheim, P. ve Moore, D. R. (2008). Observing differences
  38. between healthy and unhealthy adolescent romantic
  39. relationships: Substance abuse and interpersonal
  40. process. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 795–814. Fokkert, J. ve Van Kooten, A. M. (2009). Relationship beliefs: their association with entering into a relationship, their change over time and with transitions in relationship status. Unpublished Master
  41. Thesis. Utrecth University, Netherlands. [Online]
  42. Retrieved on 22-November-2011, at URL: http://
  43. igitur-archive.library.uu.nl Gizir, C. A. (2012). İlişki İnançları Ölçeği’nin uyarlanması:
  44. Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Mersin Üniversitesi
  45. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 37-45. Güven, N. (2005). İlişkilerle ilgili bilişsel çarpıtmalar ve
  46. evlilikte problem çözme becerilerinin evlilik doyumu
  47. ile ilişkisi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  48. Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. Hamamcı, Z. (2005). Dysfunctional relationship beliefs in
  49. marital satisfaction and adjustment. Social Behavior
  50. and Personality, 33(4), 313-328. Hazan, C. ve Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love
  51. conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of
  52. Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524. Honeycutt, J. ve Cantrill, J. (2001). Cognition,
  53. communication and romantic relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. James, S., Hunsley, J. ve Hemsworth, D. (2002). Factor
  54. structure of the relationship belief inventory. Cognitive
  55. Therapy and Research, 26(6), 729–744. Knee, C. R. (1998). Implicit theories of relationships:
  56. Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship
  57. initiation, coping and longevity. Journal of Personality
  58. and Social Psychology, 74, 360–370. Knox, D. H. ve Sporakowski, M. J. (1968). Attitudes of
  59. college students toward love. Journal of Marriage and
  60. The Family, 30(4), 638-642. Kuttler, A. F. ve Greca, A. M. L. (2004). Linkages
  61. among adolescent girls’romantic relationships, best
  62. friendships and peer networks. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 395– 414. Küçükarslan, M. ve Gizir, C. A. (2013). Romantik İnançlar
  63. Ölçeği’nin uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik
  64. çalışmaları. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi
  65. Dergisi, 9(2), 461-469. Medora, N. P., Larson, J. H., Hortaçsu, N. ve Dave, P.
  66. . Perceived attitudes towards romanticism: A
  67. cross-cultural study of American, Asian-Indian and
  68. Turkish young adults. Journal of Comparative Family
  69. Studies, 35(2), 155-76. Metts, S. ve Cupach, W. R. (1990). The influence of
  70. relationship beliefs and problem solving responses
  71. on satisfaction in romantic relationships. Human
  72. Communication Research, 17, 170–185. Montgomery, M. J. (2005). Psychosocial intimacy and
  73. identity: From early adolescence to emerging adulthood.
  74. American and Mexican Americans. Cognitive
  75. Development, 21, 441–457. Pines, A. M. (2010). Aşık olmak: Sevgililerimizi neye göre
  76. seçeriz? (Çev. M. Y. Uluengin) İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Ponzetti, J. J. ve Cate, R. M. (1988). The relationship
  77. of personal attributes and friendship variables in
  78. predicting loneliness. Journal of College Student
  79. Development, 29(4), 292-298. Q’sullivan, F. C. Cheng, M. M., Harris, M. H. ve Brooks
  80. Gunn, J. (2007). I wanna hold your hand: The
  81. progression of social, romantic and sexual events in
  82. adolescent relationships. Perspectives on Sexual and
  83. Reproductive Health, 39(2), 100-107. Raley, R. K. ve Sullivan, M. K. (2010). Social-contextual
  84. influences on adolescent romantic involvement:
  85. The constarnints of being a numerical minority.
  86. Sociological Spectrum, 30, 65–89. Romans, J. S. C. ve DeBord, J. (1995). Development of
  87. the Relationship Beliefs Questionnaire. Psychological
  88. Reports, 76, 1248–1250. Sharp, E. A. ve Ganong, L. H. (2000). Raising awareness
  89. about marital expectations: Are unrealistic beliefs
  90. changed by integrative teaching? Family Relations, 49, 71-76. Shi, L. (2003). The association between adult attachment styles and conflict resolution in romantic relationships.
  91. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 143–157. Sprecher, S. ve Metts, S. (1999). Romantic beliefs: Their
  92. influence on relationships and patterns of change over
  93. time. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 834– 851. Sprecher, S. ve Metts, S. (1989). Development of the
  94. Romantic Beliefs Scale and examination of the effects
  95. of gender and gender-role orientation. Journal of
  96. Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 387– 411. Sprecher, S. ve Toro-Morn, M. (2002). A study of men
  97. and women from different sides of earth to determine
  98. if men are from Mars and women are from Venus in
  99. their beliefs about love and romantic relationships. Sex
  100. Roles, 46, 131-147. Stackert, R. A. ve Bursik, K. (2003). Why am I unsatisfied?
  101. Adult attachment style, gendered irrational relationship
  102. beliefs and young adult romantic relationship
  103. satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1419–142. Tüfekçi, S. (2008). Romantik ilişkilerde genç yetişkinlerin
  104. aşka ilişkin tutumları ve kişilik özellikleri: Transaksiyonel
  105. analiz ego durumları açısından bir değerlendirme.
  106. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Marmara
  107. Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul. Weaver, S. E. ve Ganong, L. H. (2004). The factor structure
  108. of the Romantic Beliefs Scale for African Americans
  109. and European Americans. Journal of Social and
  110. Personal Relationships, 21(2), 171–185. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2002). The development of
  111. romantic relationships and adaptations in the system of
  112. peer relationships. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 216–225.