SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 78

Cross-Cultural Perspective on Family Resilience: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Family Resilience Scale Short Form

Gözde Önal(ANKARA MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6656-965X
Güleser Güney Yılmaz(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1781-9381
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-09-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The 16-item Turkish FRS-16 is a stable, concise, and validated tool for assessing family resilience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Family Resilience Scale Short Form (FRS-16) captures essential elements and fundamental processes of family resilience, serving as a tool for cross-cultural research and therapy outcome assessment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to adapt and validate the Turkish version of FRS-16 among university students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The 16-item Turkish FRS-16 is a stable, concise, and validated tool for assessing family resilience.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:family resilience · family communication · social support

Abstract

The Family Resilience Scale Short Form (FRS-16) captures essential elements and fundamental processes of family resilience, serving as a tool for cross-cultural research and therapy outcome assessment. This study aims to adapt and validate the Turkish version of FRS-16 among university students. A total of 430 university students participated, with a mean age of 20.94 years. The Beaton's six-stage translation method was employed to culturally adapt the scale and assess its psychometric properties. Explanatory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were conducted to establish Construct Validity. Concurrent validity was evaluated using the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) alongside FRS-16. Reliability assessment employed Cronbach's Alpha (α), McDonald's omega (ω), and Two Half Test Reliability methods to measure internal consistency. EFA results revealed three sub-dimensions like the original FRS-16: "communication and connectedness," "positive framing," and "external resources." Turkish FRS-16 and its sub-dimensions were significantly related to BRS (p<0.05). The Cronbach's α value for the 16-item scale was 0.90, and McDonald's ω value was 0.89. Test-retest reliability yielded Pearson correlation coefficients and ICC values above 0.90 for each sub-dimension and the total scale. The 16-item Turkish FRS-16 is a stable, concise, and validated tool for assessing family resilience.

🔖

Cite This Article

Önal, G., Yılmaz, G. G., *, G. Ö. (2025). Cross-Cultural Perspective on Family Resilience: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Family Resilience Scale Short Form. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Volume: 15 Issue: 78. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1537931

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Baris, V. K., & Seren Intepeler, S. (2019). Cross‐cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Turkish version of the Self‐Efficacy for Preventing Falls‐Nurse. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(8), 1791-1800. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12878
  2. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  3. Black, K., & Lobo, M. (2008). A conceptual review of family resilience factors. Journal of Family Nursing, 14(1), 33-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840707312237
  4. Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? The American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20
  5. Chen, X., Luo, L., Jiang, L., Shi, L., Yang, L., Zeng, Y., Li, F., & Li, L. (2021). Development of the nurse's communication ability with angry patients scale and evaluation of its psychometric properties. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(6), 2700–2708. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14788
  6. Cho, E. (2021). Neither Cronbach's Alpha nor McDonald's Omega: A commentary on Sijtsma and Pfadt. Psychometrika, 86(4), 877–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09801-1
  7. Chow, T. S., Tang, C. S. K., Siu, T. S. U., & Kwok, H. S. H. (2022). Family Resilience Scale Short Form (FRS-16): Validation in the US and Chinese samples. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 845803. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.845803
  8. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis. Routledge.
  9. Çokluk Bökeoğlu, Ö., & Koçak, D. (2016). Using Horn's parallel analysis method in exploratory factor analysis for determining the number of factors. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(2), 537-551. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.2.0328
  10. Dinno, A. (2009). Implementing Horn's parallel analysis for principal component analysis and factor analysis. The Stata Journal, 9(2), 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0900900207
  11. Doğan, T. (2015). Kısa psikolojik sağlamlık ölçeği’nin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 3(1), 93-102.
  12. Duncan, J. M., Garrison, M. E., & Killian, T. S. (2021). Measuring family resilience: Evaluating the Walsh family resilience questionnaire. The Family Journal, 29(1), 80-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480720956641
  13. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  14. Güngör, H. C. (2014). Aile Yılmazlığı Değerlendirme Ölçeğinin Türkçe'ye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Journal of Turkish Studies, 9(5), 651-667.
  15. Hillaker, B. D., Brophy‐Herb, H. E., Villarruel, F. A., & Haas, B. E. (2008). The contributions of parenting to social competencies and positive values in middle school youth: Positive family communication, maintaining standards, and supportive family relationships. Family Relations, 57(5), 591-601. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00525.x
  16. Holton III, E. F., Bates, R. A., Bookter, A. I., & Yamkovenko, V. B. (2007). Convergent and divergent validity of the learning transfer system inventory. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18(3), 385-419. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1210
  17. Ledesma, R. D., & Valero-Mora, P. (2019). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: An easy-to-use computer program for carrying out parallel analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 12(1), 2.
  18. Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., Lou, F., & Cao, F. (2016). Psychometric properties of the shortened Chinese version of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 2710-2717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0432-7
  19. Malkewitz, C. P., Schwall, P., Meesters, C., & Hardt, J. (2023). Estimating reliability: A comparison of Cronbach's α, McDonald's ωt, and the greatest lower bound. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100368
  20. Nickerson, A. B., & Fishman, C. (2009). Convergent and divergent validity of the Devereux Student Strengths Assessment. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015147
  21. O'Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03200807
  22. Önal, G., Huri, M., Karakükçü, M., & Demir, H. A. (2023). The Resilience Scale for Parents of Children with Cancer: Scale development and psychometric evaluation. Psycho-Oncology, 32(6), 951–960. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.6137
  23. Qiu, Y., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Ren, L., Jiang, H., Zhang, L., & Dong, C. (2021). The role of socioeconomic status, family resilience, and social support in predicting psychological resilience among Chinese maintenance hemodialysis patients. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 723344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.723344
  24. Sikka Kainth, J., & Verma, H. V. (2011). Consumption values: Scale development and validation. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 8(2), 285-300.
  25. Sixbey, M. T. (2005). Development of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale to Identify Family Resilience Constructs (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida).
  26. Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(3), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972
  27. Theiss, J. A. (2018). Family communication and resilience. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46(1), 10-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2018.1426706
  28. Walsh, F. (1996). The concept of family resilience: Crisis and challenge. Family Process, 35(3), 261-281.
  29. Walsh, F. (2003). Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice. Family Process, 42(1), 1-18.
  30. Walsh, F. (2016). Family resilience: A developmental systems framework. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(3), 313-324.
  31. Webb, C. A., Schwab, Z. J., Weber, M., DelDonno, S., Kipman, M., Weiner, M. R., & Killgore, W. D. (2013). Convergent and divergent validity of integrative versus mixed model measures of emotional intelligence. Intelligence, 41(3), 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.01.004
  32. Winslow, E., Sandler, I., & Wolchik, S. (2005). Building resilience in all children: Resilience as a process. In S. Goldstein & R. B. Brooks (Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children (pp. 337-356). Springer.
  33. Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806-838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127