Journals / Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

MISCONCEPTIONS IN CHEMISTRY TEACHING: A LITERATURE REVIEW

KİMYA ÖĞRETİMİNDE YANLIŞ KAVRAMALAR: BİR LİTERATÜR ARAŞTIRMASI

Pages
23–45
Publication Date
2005-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Some techniques which are used in determining and remediation of the students’ preconceptions and misconceptions have been emphasized in this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recent researches indicate that students have acquired considerable knowledge and ideas about the natural and technological world before any formal instruction takes place, and come to class with this prior knowledge.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, science teachers should take into account the alternative conceptions that students bring to the science classes in planning the teaching strategies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Some techniques which are used in determining and remediation of the students’ preconceptions and misconceptions have been emphasized in this study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kimya öğretimi · ön bilgi · yanlış kavrama

Abstract

Recent researches indicate that students have acquired considerable knowledge and ideas about the natural and technological world before any formal instruction takes place, and come to class with this prior knowledge. Although the prior knowledge is logical and well established in students’ ways of thinking, this is quite different from those generally accepted in science and is also quite resistant to change in ordinary classroom teaching. These conceptions are called different words such as misunderstanding, misconception, alternative conception, and alternative framework. Both national and international researches indicate that students have different prior knowledge and misconceptions about key scientific concepts. According to constructivist theory of learning, students’ prior knowledge plays an essential role in subsequent learning. Therefore, science teachers should take into account the alternative conceptions that students bring to the science classes in planning the teaching strategies. Some techniques which are used in determining and remediation of the students’ preconceptions and misconceptions have been emphasized in this study.

Özet

Öğrenciler formal olarak feni öğrenmeden önce bile doğal olaylar hakkında çeşitli fikir ve inançlar geliştirirler ve bu ön bilgilerle birlikte sınıfa gelirler. Bu ön bilgi ve beceriler öğrenci açısından mantıklı olsa da, çoğu zaman bilimsel olarak kabul edilebilir olandan farklıdır. Geleneksel öğretim yöntemleriyle değiştirilmeye karşı dirençli olan bu tür ön bilgiler yanlış anlama, yanlış kavrama, alternatif kavrama, alternatif çatı gibi çeşitli şekillerde adlandırılır. Son yıllarda gerek ulusal, gerekse uluslar arası literatürde yapılan çalışmalar, öğrencilerin pek çok farklı kavramla ilgili değişik ön bilgi ve yanlış anlamalara sahip olduklarını göstermektedir. Yapılandırmacı öğrenme teorisine göre, sonraki öğrenmeler önceki bilgilerin üzerine inşa edildiği için, öğrencilerin sahip oldukları ön bilgiler ve yanlış kavramalar öğrenmede son derece önemlidir. Bu nedenle bu tür ön bilgiler belirlenmeli ve öğretim bu ön bilgilerin dikkate alınmasıyla plânlanmalıdır. Bu çalışmada, öğrencilerin ön bilgilerinin ve yanlış kavramalarının belirlenmesi ile giderilmesinde kullanılan yöntemler üzerinde durulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZMEN, H. (2005). MISCONCEPTIONS IN CHEMISTRY TEACHING: A LITERATURE REVIEW. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 23–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/113031

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Model. Ayas, A. (1995). Fen Bilimlerinde Yeni Program Geli tirme ve Uygulama Teknikleri: 5ki Ça da Yakla m n De erlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi E itim Fakültesi Dergisi. 11, 149-155.
  2. Ayas, A. ve Demirba, A. (1997). Turkish Secondary Students’ Conceptions of Introductory Chemistry Concepts. Journal of Chemical Education. 74(5), 518-521.
  3. Ayas, A.; Karamustafao lu, S.; Cerrah, L. ve Karamustafao lu, O. (2001). Fen Bilimlerinde Ö rencilerdeki Kavram Anlama Seviyelerini ve Yan lg lar n Belirleme Yöntemleri Üzerine Bir 5nceleme. 10. Ulusal E itim Bilimleri Kongresine Sunulmu Bildiri. Ayas, A.; Özmen, H. ve Co tu, B. (2002). Lise Ö rencilerinin Buharla ma Kavram 5le 5lgili Anlamalar n n Belirlenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca E itim Fakültesi Dergisi. 14, 74-84.
  4. Ayas, A. ve Özmen, H. (2002). Students’ Misconceptions about Chemical Reactions at Secondary Level, The First International Education Conference on Changing Times, Changing Needs, Eastern Mediterranean University Faculty of Education, May 8-10,
  5. Gazimagusa, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. Ayas, A. (2002). Students’ level of understanding of five basic chemistry concepts. Bo aziçi University Journal of Education, 18, 19-32.
  6. Baird, J. R. ve Mitchell, I. J. (1986). Improving the Quality of Teaching Learning: An Australian Case Study Peel Project, Melborn. Bar, V. ve Gaglili, I. (1994). Stages of Children’s Views about Evaporation. International Journal of Science Education. 16, 157-174.
  7. Bar, V. ve Travis, A. S. (1991). Children’s Views Concerning Phase Changes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 28, 363-382.
  8. Basili, P. A. ve Sanford, J. P. (1991). Conceptual Change Strategies and Cooperative Group Work in Chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 28(4), 293-304.
  9. Beeth, M. E. (1998). Teaching Science in Fifth Grade: Instructional Goals That Support Conceptual Change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 35(10), 1091-1101.
  10. Benson, D. L.; Wittrock, M. C. ve Baur, M. E. (1993). Students’ Preconceptions of the Nature of Gases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30(6), 587-597.
  11. Ben-Zvi, R.; Eylon, B. S. ve Silberstein, J. (1986). Is an Atom of Copper Malleable? Journal of Chemical Education. 63(1), 64-66.
  12. Ben-Zvi, R.; Eylon, B. ve Silberstein, J. (1987). Students' Visualization of a Chemical Reaction. Education in Chemistry. 24(3), 117-120.
  13. Ben-Zvi, R.; Eylon, B. S. ve Silberstein, J. (1988).
  14. Theories, Principles and Laws. Education in Chemistry. 25, 89-92.
  15. Bergquist, W. v