SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

TOWARD THEIR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: DO THE PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS BENEFIT FROM ACADEMIC AND SOCIAL FACILITIES? A METU CASE

ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ ÜNİVERSİTELERDE SUNULAN SOSYAL VE AKADEMİK OLANAKLARI DEĞERLENDİRME DURUMLARI: ODTÜ ÖRNEĞİ

Tuba GÖKMENOĞLU
Ercan KİRAZ
Pages
393–409
Publication Date
2011-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that in spite of believing in participating in social and academic activities with regard to personal, social, and pedagogical development, the degree of prospective students’ participation in activities were somehow fewer than expected, and the factors influencing the degree of students’ participation in activities negatively were found as workload, time limitation, and faculty’s physical location

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to explore the degree of prospective teachers’ participation in social and academic facilities offered by Middle East Technical University.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The number of prospective students participated in the study was 212.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that in spite of believing in participating in social and academic activities with regard to personal, social, and pedagogical development, the degree of prospective students’ participation in activities were somehow fewer than expected, and the factors influencing the degree of students’ participation in activities negatively were found as workload, time limitation, and faculty’s physical location
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal ve akademik etkinlikler · öğretmen eğitimi · yetkin öğretmen özellikleri

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the degree of prospective teachers’ participation in social and academic facilities offered by Middle East Technical University. The number of prospective students participated in the study was 212. Through the descriptive analysis of the data collected, their beliefs towards professional development and participation in activities and the degree of their participation and obstacles affecting prospective students’ intention to participate activities are analyzed. The results indicate that in spite of believing in participating in social and academic activities with regard to personal, social, and pedagogical development, the degree of prospective students’ participation in activities were somehow fewer than expected, and the factors influencing the degree of students’ participation in activities negatively were found as workload, time limitation, and faculty’s physical location

Özet

Araştırma öğretmen adaylarının üniversitelerin sunmuş olduğu sosyal ve akademik etkinlikleri ne ölçüde değerlendirdiklerini ele almaktadır. Bu kapsamda, çalışmanın katılımcılarını ülkenin önde gelen üniversitelerinden biri olan Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesinin Eğitim Fakültesi’nde öğrenim gören 212 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Öğretmen adaylarının sosyal ve akademik etkinliklere karşı görüşleri, etkinliklere katılım dereceleri ve etkinliklere katılımlarını etkileyen faktörler betimsel analiz yöntemleriyle incelenmiştir. Araştırmada, öğretmen adaylarının, nitelikli ve etkinlik yönünden zengin bir üniversitede olmalarına; ayrıca kişisel ve mesleki gelişimleri için çok önemli olduğunu düşünmelerine rağmen etkinliklere katılımlarının düşük düzeyde olduğu görülmüştür. Öğrenciler, etkinliklere katılımlarını olumsuz yönde etkileyen etmenler arasında, zaman sıkıntısı, ders yükünün fazlalığı ve Eğitim Fakültesi’nin yerleşkedeki konumunu belirtmişlerdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKMENOĞLU, T., KİRAZ, E. (2011). TOWARD THEIR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: DO THE PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS BENEFIT FROM ACADEMIC AND SOCIAL FACILITIES? A METU CASE. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 393–409. https://ajindex.com/articles/113020

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ausubel, P. D., Robinson, F. G. (1969). School learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart ve Winston Inc. Blase, J. (1986). Socialization as humanization: One side of becoming a teacher. Sociology of Education, 59(2), 100-113.
  2. Bowen, H.R. (1977). Investment in learning: The individual and social value of American higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Cruickshank, D.R., Bainer, D.L., ve Metcalf, K.K. (1995). Act of teaching. USA: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Darling-Hammond, L. ve Baratz-Snowden, J. (2005). A Good teacher in every classroom: Preparing the highly qualified teachers our children deserve. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Erdoğan, M., Uşak, M. ve Aydın, H. (2008). Investigating prospective teachers’ satisfaction with social services and facilities in Turkish universities. Journal of Baltic Science Education,. 7(1), 17-26.
  3. Feldman, K.A. ve Newcomb, T.M. (1994). The impact of college on students. New Brunswick & London: Transaction Publishers.
  4. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Newbury Park. CA: Sage. Güçlü, N. ve Güçlü, M. Sempozyum’96 Modern öğretmen yetiştirmede gelişme ve ilerlemeler. Öğretmen eğitiminde nitelik sorunu. (30 Eylül-4 Ekim,1996),
  5. H.Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi, Ankara: Mesleki ve Teknik Açıköğretim Okulu Matbaası. 48-60.
  6. Güvenç, B. (1992). Eğitim sorunlarımız ve eğitimci. Eğitim ve Bilim, 84(16), 3-8.
  7. Karemera, D., Reuben, L. J. ve Sillah, M.R. (2003). The effect of academic environment and background characteristics on student satisfaction and performance: the case of south Carolina State University’s school of business. College Student Journal, 37(2), 298–309.
  8. ODTÜ. (2008). Yerleşkede yaşam, öğrenci toplulukları. İnternet’ten, 20, 2009’da elde edilmiştir: http://www.odtu.edu.tr/clife/studgroups.php.
  9. ODTÜ. (2008). ODTÜ Uluslararası bahar şenliği. İnternet’ten, 20, 2009’da elde edilmiştir: http://www.metu.edu.tr/home/wwwkim/senlik.html.
  10. ODTÜ. (2008). ODTÜ’nün misyonu. İnternet’ten, 20, 2009’da elde edilmiştir: http://www.odtu.edu.tr/about/misguide.php.
  11. Murtaugh, M. (1988). Achievement outside the classroom: The role of nonacademic activities in the lives of high school students. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 19(4), 382-395.
  12. Medley, D. (1986). Teacher effectiveness. In H. Mitzel (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Educational Research (pp. 1894-1903). New York: MacMillan. Ornstein, A. C. (1976). Can we define a good teacher? Peabody Journal of Education, 53(3), 201-207.
  13. Önder, S. (2003). A research on determination of recreational tend