SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İlköğretim Online / 2010 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Crises, Reforms, and Scientific Improvements: Behaviorism in the Last Two Centuries

Krizler, Reformlar ve Bilimsel İlerlemeler: Son İki Yüzyılda Davranışçılık

Tuba GÖKMENOĞLU
Esra ERET
Ercan Kiraz
Pages
292–300
Publication Date
2010-06-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lastly, this paper might contribute to the literature by pointing out the rebirth of behaviorism in the near future as a result of socio-political concerns

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The changes in the society evolve the theories; the changes in the theory affect the research; and, in return, the changes in the theory and research change the society.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pursuing this widely-accepted idea, the aim of this paper is to examine the development of behaviorism by analyzing the historical and socio-political events.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lastly, this paper might contribute to the literature by pointing out the rebirth of behaviorism in the near future as a result of socio-political concerns
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:davranışçılık · insan tarihi · felsefi temeller

Abstract

The changes in the society evolve the theories; the changes in the theory affect the research; and, in return, the changes in the theory and research change the society. Pursuing this widely-accepted idea, the aim of this paper is to examine the development of behaviorism by analyzing the historical and socio-political events. The paper emphasizes the philosophical bases of behaviorism namely realism, materialism and reductionism, and also some corner stones of scientific, technological, and socio-political events such as World War I and II. In addition to these, effects of those scientific improvements and crises are investigated in relation to the development of behaviorism and education. Behaviorism is still used in many areas of education such as military education and technology-based education. Lastly, this paper might contribute to the literature by pointing out the rebirth of behaviorism in the near future as a result of socio-political concerns

Özet

Bilindiği gibi yaşamdaki bilgilerin teorileri değiştirilmektedir ve teorilerdeki kitaplarıetkilemektedir; sonuç olarak teori ve araştırmalardaki kolaj de toplumu etkilemekte ve değiştirilmektedir. Bu görüşün alınmadığı, bu makalenin amacı ve sosyo-ekonomik olayları analiz ederek davranışçılığın gelişimini inceleme. Makale içeren davranışçılığın felsefi temellerini (realizm, materyalizm ve indirgemecilik) Birinci Dünya Savaşı ve Kinci Dünya Savaşı gibi önemli olayları vurgulamak. Bunlara ek olarak, bu olayların üzerinde meydana neden geliyor insanlık amaçlı inişler ve çıkışlar, davranışlığa ve eğitime olan şeyler. Davranışçılık günmece halen askeri eğitim ya da teknoloji-destekli eğitim gibi eğitimin var. Ve sonuç olarak, bu bu kadar neden birlik bütünlük çabaları ve sosyo-politik yeniden popülerlik kazanacağına işaret etmesi bakımından yazın alanına katkıda bulunacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKMENOĞLU, T., ERET, E., Kiraz, E. (2010). Crises, Reforms, and Scientific Improvements: Behaviorism in the Last Two Centuries. İlköğretim Online, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 292–300. https://ajindex.com/articles/999280

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Armstrong, D. M. (1968). Materialist theory of mind. London: Routledge Bijou, S. W., Birnbrauer, J. S., Kidder, J. D. & Tague, C. (1968). Programmed instruction as an approach to the teaching of reading, writing and arithmetic to retarded children. US Department of Education, Educational Resources Information Centre. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED019191). Bilim, C. (1999). Ayd nlanma ça!. Anadolu Universitesi, AçYk Ö retim YayYnlarY. In GüneR,  & Bilim, C. (1999). Ça!da# dünya tarihi. EskiRehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi YayYnlarY Bobbit, F. (1924). The new technique of curriculum-making. The Elementary School Journal, 75, 71-77.
  2. Boli, J., Ramirez, F. O., Meyer, J. W. (1985). Explaining the origins and expansion of mass education. Comparative Education Review, 29 (2), 145-170.
  3. Bondi, J. & Wiles, J. (1989). Curriculum development a guide to practice. United States: Merrill. Burton, J.K, Moore, D.M. & Magliaro, S.G. (1996). Behaviorism and instructional technology. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 46-73). New York: Macmillan. Curzon, L. B. (2004). Teaching in further education. London: MPG Books Ltd. Cobban, A. (1999). Social interpretation of French revolution (2nd ed). UK: Cambridge University Press,
  4. Eisner, E. W. (1967). Franklin Bobbitt and the "science" of curriculum making. The School Review, 75 (1), 29-47.
  5. Eken, H. (2006). KüreselleRme ve ulus devlet (Globalization and Nation-State). Selçuk University Journal of Social Sciences, 16, 243-262.
  6. Erdamar, G. & Demirel, M. (2008). YapYlandYrmacY ö renme yaklaRYmYnYn duyuRsal ve biliRsel ö renme ürünlerine etkisi. Türk E!itim Bilimleri Dergisi 6 (4), 629-661. GüneR, . (1999). Birinci Dünya Sava#. Anadolu Üniversitesi, AçYk Ö retim YayYnlarY. In GüneR,  & Bilim, C. (1999). Ça!da# dünya tarihi. EskiRehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi YayYnlarY. Hargreaves, D. H. (1980). A sociological critique of individualism in education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 28 (3), 187-198.
  7. Henson, K. (2006). Curriculum planning: integrating multiculturalism, constructivism and education reform. United States: Waveland Inc. Lafferty, B. (2007). Behaviorism. Individual foundations report (EDUC 605 course). Retrieved in 12.11.2008 from http://5laffs.googlepages.com/EDUC_605_FR.pdf
  8. Lumsdaine, A. A. (1959). Teaching machines and self-instructional materials. Educational Technology Research and Development, 7 (3), 163-181.
  9. Oliva, P.F. (1997). Developing the cu