SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

A COMPARISON OF ORAL PERFORMANCE TASKS PREPARED USING MOBILE PHONES WITH TRADITIONAL WRITTEN PERFORMANCE TASKS

İNGİLİZCE DERSİNDE CEP TELEFONLARIYLA ÜRETİLEN SÖZLÜ PERFORMANS ÖDEVLERİNİN YAZILI PERFORMANS ÖDEVLERiYLE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Nihat ŞAD
Mustafa AKDAĞ
Pages
719–740
Publication Date
2010-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is concluded that mobile phones can be used more effectively in performance tasks, compared to traditional paper-pencil based ones.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims at comparing the performance tasks prepared by using mobile phones and traditional paper-pencil ones in terms of their effect on students’ learning the grammar subject studied in the lesson.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 112 8th graders were involved in this control group pre-test-post-test study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is concluded that mobile phones can be used more effectively in performance tasks, compared to traditional paper-pencil based ones.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İngilizce öğretimi · mobil öğrenme · cep telefonu

Abstract

This study aims at comparing the performance tasks prepared by using mobile phones and traditional paper-pencil ones in terms of their effect on students’ learning the grammar subject studied in the lesson. A total of 112 8th graders were involved in this control group pre-test-post-test study. The analysis of the data revealed no significant difference between the pre-test and post-test mean scores of the control group, while the difference was significant between the pre-test and post-test mean scores of experimental group in favor of the post-test, and between post-test mean scores of the control and experiment groups in favor of the latter. It is concluded that mobile phones can be used more effectively in performance tasks, compared to traditional paper-pencil based ones.

Özet

Bu çalışmada cep telefonlarıyla üretilen İngilizce performans ödevleriyle geleneksel yazılı ödevlerin, öğrencilerin derste işlenen dil bilgisi konusunu öğrenmelerine etkilerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla Malatya Gazi İlköğretim Okulu 8. Sınıfında okuyan 112 öğrenci çalışma grubu olarak belirlenmiştir. Çalışmada kontrol gruplu ön test-son test deseni kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda kontrol grubunun ön test ve son test puan ortalamaları arasında manidar bir farka rastlanmazken, deney grubunun ön test ve son test puan ortalamaları arasında son test lehine ve kontrol ve deney gruplarının son test puanları arasında deney grubu lehine manidar bir farka rastlanmıştır. Bulgulardan hareketle, geleneksel yazılı performans ödevlerine kıyasla, cep telefonlarının İngilizce performans ödevlerinin hazırlanmasında daha etkili bir şekilde kullanılabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAD, N., AKDAĞ, M. (2010). A COMPARISON OF ORAL PERFORMANCE TASKS PREPARED USING MOBILE PHONES WITH TRADITIONAL WRITTEN PERFORMANCE TASKS. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 719–740. https://ajindex.com/articles/112961

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Akyel, A. (2003). Yabancı bir dil olarak İngilizce eğitim ve öğretiminde yaşanan sorunlar, çözümler ve Sisteminde yabancı dil eğitimi ve kalite arayışları. (97-103). Özel Okullar Derneği. gelişmeler. İçinde: İ. Erdoğan (Ed.), Türk Eğitim İstanbul:
  2. Armstrong, T. (2000). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Alexandria, VA, USA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development. Bümen, N. (2005). Çoklu zekâ kuramı ve eğitim. İçinde: Ö. Demirel (Ed.), Eğitimde Yeni Yönelimler (1-38). Ankara:
  3. PegemA Yayıncılık. Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Emerging technologies, going to the mall: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology. 10(1), 9-16.
  4. Çavuş, N. ve İbrahim, D. (2009). M-learning: An experiment in using sms to support learning new English language words. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 78–91.
  5. Demirezen, M. (1992). Video, language teaching and language teacher. H.Ü Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7, 295- 311. Dudeney, G. ve Hockly, N.(2007). How to teach English with technology. Essex, UK: Pearson-Longman. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Erben, T.; Ban, R. ve Castañeda, M.(2009). Teaching English language learners through technology. New York: Routledge. Gardner, H. ve Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher. 15(8), 4-9.
  7. Gill, C. S. (1996). Using drama techniques to encourage oral interaction. The EnglishTeacher. 25, 72-86. İnternet‟ten 10 Kasım 2007 tarihinde elde edilmiştir: http://www.melta.org.my/ET/1996/main6.html.
  8. Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of english language teaching. England: Longman. Holzinger, A., Nischelwitzer, A. & Meisenberger, M. (2005). Mobile phones as a challenge for m-learning: examples for mobile interactive learning objects. The 3rd IEEE International Conference on Pervasive and Communication, (Kauai Island, HI) kongresine sunulmuş bildiri. Computing İnternet‟ten 07 Şubat http://user.meduni-raz.at/andreas.holzinger/holzinger/papers%20en/A32 %20Holzinger%20et%20al%20(2005)%20Mobile%20Phones%20as%20a %20Challenge%20IEEE%20PerCom.pdf elde edilmiştir: Hyacinth, G. (1990). Using drama techniques in language teaching. İçinde: S, Anivan (Ed.), Language Teaching Methodology for the Nineties (230-249). ERIC No: ED366197. Kartal, E. (2005). Bilişim-iletişim teknolojileri ve dil öğretim endüstrisi. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technolog