Journals / Milel ve Nihal / 2017 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

Titus Burckhardt and Religious Symbolism in Architecture

Titus Burckhardt ve Mimaride Dini Sembolizm

Pages
159–173
Publication Date
2017-12-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to him, the aniconism preserves the primordial dignity of man, whose form, ‘made in the image of God’; on the other hand, nothing that could possibly be an idol, may interpose itself between man and the invisible presence of God.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Titus Burckhardt, was one of the most famous Traditionalist philosopher in the last century.
📊
Key Findings & Data:He devoted his life to the study and exposition of the different aspects of Wisdom and Tradition.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to him, the aniconism preserves the primordial dignity of man, whose form, ‘made in the image of God’; on the other hand, nothing that could possibly be an idol, may interpose itself between man and the invisible presence of God.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Titus Burckhardt · Gelenekselcilik · İslam mimarisi

Abstract

Titus Burckhardt, was one of the most famous Traditionalist philosopher in the last century. He devoted his life to the study and exposition of the different aspects of Wisdom and Tradition. Burckhardt was one of the most remarkable exponents of universal truth, in the realm of metaphysics as well as in the realm of cosmology and of traditional art. This article aims to explain some aspects of his approach to the architecture in general and the Islamic architecture especially. The ‘unity’ is the principal dimension of the Islamic architecture. According to Burckhardt, the Kaʿba is the very primordial architecture on the earth that has an cosmologic symbolism. It has literally central importance for its architecture. Every Muslim faces the Kaʿba to recite the canonical prayers, and every mosque is accordingly orientated in this direction. For Burckhardt, the non using of image or as he says the ‘aniconism’ is also one of the most exeptional part of Islamic art and architecture. According to him, the aniconism preserves the primordial dignity of man, whose form, ‘made in the image of God’; on the other hand, nothing that could possibly be an idol, may interpose itself between man and the invisible presence of God.

Özet

Titus Burckhardt, Gelenekselci Ekole mensup en önemli filozoflardan biridir. Araştırmalarını Hikmet ve Geleneğin metafizik boyutları ve onların sanat ve mimarideki tezahürleri üzerinde yapan Burckhardt, düşüncelerini İslam sanatı ve mimarisindeki çalışmalarıyla ortaya koymuştur. Makalede Burckhardt’ın Gelenekselci sanat bakış açısına göre mimari yapılara dair g.rüşleri ele alınmaktadır. Burckhardt’a göre, İslam mimarisinin en önemli özelliği, ‘birlik’ yani ‘tevhid’ sembolizmi dayalı bir yapıya sahip olmasıdır. Kabe, İslam’ın ilk mimari yapısı olması hem de sembolizmi bakımından merkezi bir öneme sahiptir. Burckhardt, İslam dini mimarisinde özellikle ikonalara yer verilmemesini Tanrı ile insan arasında hiçbir varlığın yer alamayacağını ifade eden ‘anikonizm’ ya da ‘ikonasızcılık’ olarak tanımlamaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

Taşpınar, İ. (2017). Titus Burckhardt and Religious Symbolism in Architecture. Milel ve Nihal, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 159–173. https://doi.org/10.17131/milel.377641

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Heather Elgood, Hinduism and the Religious Arts, New York 2000.
  2. İsmail Taşpınar, Doğu Dinlerinde Hac İbadeti, Hinduizm ve Budizm, İstanbul, 2016.
  3. Kitabı Mukaddes Eski ve Yeni Ahit, İstanbul 1996.
  4. Malek Chebel, Dictionnaire des Symboles Musulmans, Rites, Mystique et Civilisation, Paris 1995.
  5. Müttefekun Aleyh Hadisler, Buharî ve Müslim’in İttifak Ettikleri Hadisler, Haz.: Abdullah Feyzi Kocaer, İstanbul 2005.
  6. Selçuk Mülayim, Türk Sanatında İkonografik Dönüşümler, Değişimin Tanıkları, İstanbul 2015.
  7. Selçuk Mülayim, İslâm Sanatı, Ankara 2013.
  8. Titus Burckhardt, L’Art de l’Islam, Langage et Signification, Paris 1985.