Journals / Folklor/Edebiyat / 2026 / Cilt: 30 Sayı: 118

The Iconography of Artemisia in Susan Vreeland’s The Passion of Artemisia

Susan Vreeland’in Artemisia’nın Çilesi Romanında Artemisia İkonografisi

Asya Sakine Uçar(IĞDIR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9653-2911
Pages
395–412
Publication Date
2024-05-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, the exploration of Artemisia’s art within the context of iconotexts suggests a deeper and alternative engagement on the enduring relevance of Artemisia’s art and its impact on contemporary understandings of gender in challenging the constraints imposed on women and creating a space for alternative narratives of women’s lives.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Passion of Artemisia by Susan Vreeland focuses on Artemisia Gentileschi, a revolutionary Italian painter from post-Renaissance period known for her idiosyncratic approach to painting with unprecedented portrayals of potent and defiant women.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to show how Vreeland’s novel turns into an iconotext providing not only visual representations from Artemisia’s oeuvre consisting of Biblical, mythological and historical heroines, but also offers a distinctive perspective into the personal and artistic vision of the painter in conveying her own history of sexual harassment and violence.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, the exploration of Artemisia’s art within the context of iconotexts suggests a deeper and alternative engagement on the enduring relevance of Artemisia’s art and its impact on contemporary understandings of gender in challenging the constraints imposed on women and creating a space for alternative narratives of women’s lives.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:sanat · Artemisia · ikon metin

Abstract

The Passion of Artemisia by Susan Vreeland focuses on Artemisia Gentileschi, a revolutionary Italian painter from post-Renaissance period known for her idiosyncratic approach to painting with unprecedented portrayals of potent and defiant women. This study aims to show how Vreeland’s novel turns into an iconotext providing not only visual representations from Artemisia’s oeuvre consisting of Biblical, mythological and historical heroines, but also offers a distinctive perspective into the personal and artistic vision of the painter in conveying her own history of sexual harassment and violence. With a focus on certain female figures from Artemisia’s paintings, this study employs an ekphrastic and iconographical analysis in ascertaining how these images enact her own sexual ordeal which is explicitly expressed in depictions of revenge or suppressed anger. This study argues that by constructing such a narrative, Vreeland explores and projects the gender dynamics offering a counterpoint to the prevalent narratives and patriarchal norms that often depict women as passive, submissive, or objects of desire. Thus, the exploration of Artemisia’s art within the context of iconotexts suggests a deeper and alternative engagement on the enduring relevance of Artemisia’s art and its impact on contemporary understandings of gender in challenging the constraints imposed on women and creating a space for alternative narratives of women’s lives.

Özet

Susan Vreeland tarafından kaleme alınan Artemisia’nın Çilesi romanı, Rönesans sonrası dönemde yaşamış ve özellikle güçlü, meydan okuyan kadınları kendine özgü yaklaşımıyla resmeden devrimci İtalyan ressam Artemisia Gentileschi’ye odaklanır. Bu çalışma, Vreeland’ın romanının, Artemisia’nın İncil, mitoloji ve tarihten ilham aldığı kahramanlarından oluşan eserlerinden görsel temsiller sunmakla kalmayıp, aynı zamanda ressamın kendi cinsel taciz ve şiddet deneyimini aktarırken kişisel ve sanatsal vizyonuna dair ayırt edici bir bakış açısı sunan bir ikon metne nasıl dönüştüğünü göstermeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, Artemisia’nın resimlerinden belli başlı kadın figürlere odaklanarak bu imgelerin intikam ya da bastırılmış öfke tasvirlerinde açıkça ifade edilen kendi cinsel çilesini nasıl yansıtttığını göstermek için ekfrastik ve ikonografik bir analiz kullanmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Vreeland’ın bu anlatı ile kadınları genellikle pasif, itaatkâr ya da arzu nesnesi olarak tasvir eden yaygın anlatılara ve ataerkil normlara karşı toplumsal cinsiyet dinamiklerini sorgulayan bir bakış açısı sunduğunu savunmaktadır. Dolayısıyla, Artemisia’nın sanatının ikono metinler bağlamında incelenmesi, kadınlara dayatılan kısıtlamalara meydan okuyarak ve kadınların yaşamlarına dair alternatif anlatılar için bir alan yaratarak Artemisia’nın sanatının kalıcı önemi ve çağdaş toplumsal cinsiyet anlayışları üzerindeki etkisi üzerine daha derin ve alternatif bir etkileşim önermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uçar, A. S. (2024). The Iconography of Artemisia in Susan Vreeland’s The Passion of Artemisia. Folklor/Edebiyat, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 118, 395–412. https://doi.org/10.22559/folklor.2680

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Auvray, H. (2020). Judith slaying Holofernes: Artemisia Gentileschi’s feminist expression of revenge violence? Paper presented at UBC Undergraduate Art History Symposium, Vancouver.
  2. Benedetti, L. (1999). Reconstructing Artemisia: Twentieth-century images of a woman artist. Comparative Literature, 51(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/1771455
  3. Christiansen K. Mann J. W. Gentileschi O. Gentileschi A. Museo di Palazzo Venezia (Rome Italy) Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York N.Y.) & St Louis Art Museum. (2001). Orazio and artemisia gentileschi. Metropolitan Museum of Art, Yale University Press.
  4. Cohen, E. S. (2000). The Trials of Artemisia Gentileschi: A Rape as History. The Sixteenth Century Journal. 31(1), 47-75. https://doi.org/10.2307/2671289
  5. Conn, V. L. (2009) The personal is the political: Artemisia Gentileschi’s revolutionary self-portrait as the allegory of painting, Kaleidoscope, 8(6), 23-29.
  6. Garrard, M. D. (2020). Artemisia Gentileschi and Feminism in Early Modern Europe. Reaction Books.
  7. Garrard, M. D. (1980). Artemisia Gentileschi’s self-portrait as the allegory of painting. The Art Bulletin, 62(1), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.2307/3049963
  8. Lanone, C. (2006). Pain, paint and popular fiction: The Passion of Artemisia by Susan Vreeland, Études britanniques contemporaines. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ebc/12343; DOI: https://doi. org/10.4000/ebc.12343
  9. Locker, J. M. (2015). Artemisia Gentileschi: The language of painting. Yale University Press.
  10. Panofsky, E. (1939). Studies in Iconology: Humanistic themes in the art of renaissance. Oxford University Press.
  11. Pollock, G. (2005). Feminist dilemmas with the art/life problem (In Mieke Bal, Ed.) The Artemisia Files: Artemisia Gentileschi for Feminists and Other Thinking People, (pp. 169-206). University of Chicago Press.
  12. Russell P., Gentileschi A. (2017). Delphi complete works of Artemisia Gentileschi (Illustrated). Delphi Classics.
  13. Russo, S. (2022). “I am Artemisia”: Art and Trauma in Joy McCullough’s Blood Water Paint: [Artemisia Gentileschi (1593–1656); visual artist]. (In J. Fitzmaurice, N. J. Miller, & S. J.
  14. Steen, Eds.) Authorizing Early Modern European Women: From Biography to Biofiction (pp. 235– 248). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv24650fw.22
  15. Vreeland, S. (2002). The Passion of Artemisia. Viking.
  16. Wagner, P. (1996).Icons - Texts - Iconotexts: Essays on Ekphrasis and intermediality. De Gruyter. https:// doi.org/10.1515/9783110882599