Journals / Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

PREDICTION OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING OF UNIVERITY STUDENTS VIA SELF REGULATION, HUMOUR, SOCIAL SELF-EFFICACY AND STRESS-COPING STRATEGIES

ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN ÖZNEL İYİ OLUŞLARININ DUYGUSAL DÜZENLEME, MİZAH, SOSYAL ÖZ-YETERLİK VE BAŞAÇIKMA DAVRANIŞLARI İLE YORDANMASI

Pages
325–345
Publication Date
2012-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Self regulation, humour styles, social self-efficacy and coping strategies were concluded to be important variables for the well-being of students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It was aimed to examine the predictable value of self regulation, humour, social self-efficacy and stress-coping strategies on subjective well-being.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study was used the screening model, the population of the study composed of 248 female and 171 male students, (a total of 419 subjects) attending at the 2nd, 3rd and 4th grades of the Faculty of Education, Gazi University, Ankara. “The Subjective Well-Being Scale”, “The Humour Styles Scale”, “The Stress-Coping Behaviours Inventory”, “The Self Regulation Scale” and “Social Self-Efficacy Perception” were used in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Self regulation, humour styles, social self-efficacy and coping strategies were concluded to be important variables for the well-being of students.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Öznel İyi Oluş · Mizah · Başaçıkma

Abstract

It was aimed to examine the predictable value of self regulation, humour, social self-efficacy and stress-coping strategies on subjective well-being. In this study was used the screening model, the population of the study composed of 248 female and 171 male students, (a total of 419 subjects) attending at the 2nd, 3rd and 4th grades of the Faculty of Education, Gazi University, Ankara. “The Subjective Well-Being Scale”, “The Humour Styles Scale”, “The Stress-Coping Behaviours Inventory”, “The Self Regulation Scale” and “Social Self-Efficacy Perception” were used in the study. In addition, regression analysis was made for the data analysis. Self regulation, humour styles, social self-efficacy and coping strategies were concluded to be important variables for the well-being of students.

Özet

Araştırmanın amacı, üniversite öğrencilerinin, öznel iyi oluşlarının; duygusal düzenleme, mizah, sosyal öz-yeterlik ve stresle başaçıkma stratejileri ile açıklanmasıdır. Tarama modelinin kullanıldığı araştırmada, araştırma grubunu, Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi 2, 3 ve 4. sınıflarında öğrenim gören 248 kız, (%59), 171 erkek (%41), olmak üzere toplam 419 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada “Öznel İyi Oluş Ölçeği”, “Mizah Tarzları Ölçeği, “Stresle Başaçıkma Davranışları Envanteri”, “Duygusal Düzenleme Ölçeği” ve “Sosyal Öz-yeterlilik Algısı” ölçme araçları kullanılmış ve verilerin çözümlenmesinde regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda duygusal düzenleme, mizah tarzları, öz-yeterlik ve başaçıkma stratejilerinin, öğrencilerin iyi oluşunu açıklamada önemli değişkenler olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZBAY, Y., PALANCI, M., KANDEMİR, M., ÇAKIR, O. (2012). PREDICTION OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING OF UNIVERITY STUDENTS VIA SELF REGULATION, HUMOUR, SOCIAL SELF-EFFICACY AND STRESS-COPING STRATEGIES. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 325–345. https://ajindex.com/articles/112798

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alden, L.E. and Wallace, S.T. (1995). Social phobia and social appraisal in successful and unsuccessful interactions. Behaviour Research and Therapy 33(1995), pp. 497–506.
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3) 75–78.
  3. Cann, A. and Calhoun, G.L. (2001). Percieved personality assocations with differences in sense of humor: stereotypes of hypothetical others with high or low sense of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 14(2), 117–130.
  4. Caprara, G.V., Steca, P., Cervone, D., and Artistico D. (2003). The contribution of self-efficacy beliefs to dispositional shyness: on social-cognitive systems and the development of personality dispositions. Journal of Personality, 71:943–970.
  5. Celso, B.C., Ebener, D.J. and Burkhead, H.(2003). Humor coping, health status, and life satisfaction among older adults residing in asisited living facilities. Aging and Mental Health, 7(6), 438–445.
  6. Diener, E. (2006). Frequently asked questions, about subjective well-being (Happiness and life satisfaction) (http://s.psych.uiuc.edu/~ediener/faq. html). Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology. 24, 25–41.
  7. Diener, E., Suh, E., and Lucas, E. (1999). Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.
  8. Fleishman, J. A. (1984). Personality characteristics and coping patterns. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 25, 229–244.
  9. Folkman, S., and Lazarus, R. S. (1984). Stres, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer Co. Gross, J. J., and John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: ımplications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholog, 85, 348–362.
  10. Hampton, N. Z. (2000). Culture, gender, self-efficacy, and life satisfaction: a comparison between americans and chinese people with spinal cord ınjuries. Journal of Rehabilitation. Hampton, N. Z. (2004). Subjective well-being among people with spinal cord injuries: the role of self-efficacy, perceived social support, and perceived health. Rehabil Counsel Bull, 48:31–37.
  11. Houston, D. M., Mckeee K. L., Carroll, L., and Marsh, H. (1998). Using humor to promote psychological well-being in residential homes for older people. Aging ve Mental Health, 2(4), 328-332
  12. İlhan, T. (2005). Öz