SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

ASSESSMENT PREFERENCES OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS ABOUT MATHEMATICS COURSE

SINIF ÖĞRETMENLİĞİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ MATEMATİK DERSİNE İLİŞKİN ÖLÇME - DEĞERLENDİRME TERCİHLERİ

Ayten Pınar BAL
Pages
459–479
Publication Date
2012-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As the result of the study, it was found that pre-service teachers demand information about assessment methods before they got prepared for the exams and they prefer measurement tools revealing cognitive processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This is a descriptive study aiming to investigate assessment preferences of pre-service teachers about mathematics course.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This inventory was developed by Birenbaum (1994).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As the result of the study, it was found that pre-service teachers demand information about assessment methods before they got prepared for the exams and they prefer measurement tools revealing cognitive processes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Değerlendirme Tercihleri Ölçeği · Ölçme-Değerlendirme · Geleneksel ve Alternatif Ölçme-Değerlendirme

Abstract

This is a descriptive study aiming to investigate assessment preferences of pre-service teachers about mathematics course. As the data collection tool, “Assessment Preferences Inventory (API)” was used. This inventory was developed by Birenbaum (1994). As the result of the study, it was found that pre-service teachers demand information about assessment methods before they got prepared for the exams and they prefer measurement tools revealing cognitive processes. In line with these findings, it can be suggested that pre-service teachers ought to be informed about assessment methods at the beginning and at the end of the academic term and they can be assessed through techniques that bring their cognitive processes to light.

Özet

Bu çalışma, sınıf öğretmenliği bölümüne devam eden öğretmen adaylarının matematik dersindeki değerlendirme tercihlerini belirlemeye yönelik tarama modelinde betimsel bir çalışmadır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu, Çukurova Üniversitesi İlköğretim Bölümü Sınıf Öğretmenliği Ana Bilim Dalına devam eden 154 öğretmen adayı oluşturmuştur. Veri toplama aracı olarak Birenbaum (1994) tarafından geliştirilen “Değerlendirme Tercihleri Ölçeği (DTÖ)” kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda, öğretmen adaylarının değerlendirmeye hazırlık aşamasında ve sonrasında bilgi istedikleri, bilişsel süreçleri ortaya koyacak nitelikte ölçme araçlarını tercih ettikleri bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Bu sonuçlar doğrultusunda, öğretim döneminin başında ve sonrasında nasıl değerlendirilme yapılacağı konusunda öğretmen adaylarına gerekli yönergelerin verilmesi ve bilişsel süreçleri ortaya çıkaracak nitelikte değerlendirmeler yapılması önerilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAL, A. P. (2012). ASSESSMENT PREFERENCES OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS ABOUT MATHEMATICS COURSE. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 459–479. https://ajindex.com/articles/112762

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Archbald, D. A. ve Grant, T. J. (2000). What’s on the test? An analytical framework and findings from an examination of teachers’ math tests. Educational Assessment, 6(4), 221–256.
  2. Baeten, M., Dochy, F. ve Struyven, K. (2008). Students’ approaches to learning and assessment preferences in a portfolio-based learning environment. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 36, 359-374.
  3. Beller, M. ve Gafni, N. (2000). Can ıtem format (multiple choice vs. open-ended) account for gender differences in Mathematics achievement? Sex Roles, 42 (1/2), 1-21.
  4. Ben-Chaim, D. ve Zoller, U. (1997). Examination-type preferences of secondary school students and their teachers in the science disciplines. Instructional Science, 25 (5), 347-367.
  5. Birenbaum M. ve Feldman, R. A. (1998). Relationships between learning patterns and attitudes towards two assessment formats. Educational Research, 40(1), 90-98.
  6. Birenbaum, M. (1994). Toward adaptive assessment - the student's angle. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20, 239-255.
  7. Birenbaum, M. (1997). Assessment preferences and their relationship to learning strategies and orientations. Higher Education, 33, 71-84.
  8. Birenbaum, M. ve Rosenau, S. (2006). Assessment preferences, learning orientations, and learning strategies of pre-service and in-service teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 32(2), 213-225.
  9. Birgin O. (2007). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının ölçme ve değerlendirme konusundaki okur-yazarlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi E. Erginer (Ed.), XVI. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi (Cilt 3, 498-503). Ankara:
  10. Detay Yayıncılık. Black, P. ve Wiliam, D. (1998a). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
  11. Black, P. ve Wiliam, D. (1998b). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy ve Practice, 5(1), 7-68.
  12. Brookhart, S. M. (1994). Teachers’ grading: practice and theory. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(4), 279-301.
  13. Brown, G. T. L. ve Hirschfeld, G. H. F. (2007). Students’ conception of assessment and mathematics: Self regulation raises achievement. Australian Journal of Education ve Development Psychology, 7, 63-74.
  14. Bryant, D. D. (2001). The perception of secondary mathematics teachers in Christian schools on the effectiveness of alternative assessment on academic achievement. Unpublished master dissertation. University of Memphis, Memphis. Büyüköztürk Ş. ve Gülbahar Y. (2010). Assessment preferences of higher ed