SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 23 Sayı: 50

Development of a “Pictorial Values Scale for Children”: A Validity and Reliability Study

Çocuklar için Resimli Değerler Ölçeği'nin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Derya Kayıran(KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, KAHRAMANMARAŞ SAĞLIK HİZMETLERİ MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0002-0137-2119
Pages
527–556
Publication Date
2025-12-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Reliability analyses indicated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .91 for SSV, α = .71 for PMEV, and α = .91 for the overall scale), supporting the robustness of the instrument.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to develop a valid and reliable measurement instrument the Pictorial Values Scale for Children (PVSC) to assess value awareness among preschool and primary school-aged children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A pilot study with 250 children preceded the EFA conducted on a sample of 517, which revealed a two-factor structure Social and Societal Values (SSV) and Personal, Moral, and Emotional Values (PMEV) explaining 61.4% of the total variance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Reliability analyses indicated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .91 for SSV, α = .71 for PMEV, and α = .91 for the overall scale), supporting the robustness of the instrument.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Değerler Eğitimi · Ölçek Geliştirme · Resim Temelli Değerler Ölçeği

Abstract

This study aims to develop a valid and reliable measurement instrument the Pictorial Values Scale for Children (PVSC) to assess value awareness among preschool and primary school-aged children. Employing a descriptive survey research design, the study included expert-based content validity procedures, pilot testing, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Content validity was established through evaluations provided by ten field experts. A pilot study with 250 children preceded the EFA conducted on a sample of 517, which revealed a two-factor structure Social and Societal Values (SSV) and Personal, Moral, and Emotional Values (PMEV) explaining 61.4% of the total variance. The CFA, performed with an independent sample of 500, confirmed the proposed factor structure and demonstrated excellent model fit indices (CFI = .98, RMSEA = .060, SRMR = .039). Reliability analyses indicated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .91 for SSV, α = .71 for PMEV, and α = .91 for the overall scale), supporting the robustness of the instrument. The PVSC, encompassing 15 core values presented through pictorial Likert-type items, is a valid, reliable, and age-appropriate tool for measuring young children’s value awareness.

Özet

Bu çalışma, okul öncesi ve ilkokul dönemindeki çocukların değer farkındalıklarını ölçmek amacıyla geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olan Çocuklar İçin Resimli Değerler Ölçeği (ÇRDÖ)’nün geliştirilmesini hedeflemektedir. Betimsel tarama modeline dayanan araştırma süreci; kapsam geçerliği çalışması, pilot uygulama, açımlayıcı faktör analizi (AFA) ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) aşamalarını içermektedir. Kapsam geçerliği, alanında uzman on akademisyenin görüşleriyle sağlanmıştır. Pilot uygulama 250 çocukla gerçekleştirilmiş, ardından 517 çocuktan elde edilen verilerle yapılan AFA sonucunda, Sosyal ve Toplumsal Değerler (STD) ile Kişisel, Ahlaki ve Duygusal Değerler (KADD) olmak üzere iki faktörlü bir yapı belirlenmiştir. Bu iki faktör toplam varyansın %61,4’ünü açıklamaktadır. Bağımsız bir örneklemden (n = 500) elde edilen DFA sonuçları, modelin mükemmel uyum gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur (CFI = .98, RMSEA = .060, SRMR = .039). Ölçeğin güvenirlik analizleri yüksek iç tutarlılık düzeylerini göstermiştir (Cronbach alfa: STD = .91, KADD = .71, toplam ölçek = .91). On beş temel değeri resimli Likert tipi maddelerle ölçen ÇRDÖ, çocukların değer farkındalıklarını değerlendirmede geçerli, güvenilir ve yaşa uygun bir ölçme aracıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kayıran, D. (2025). Development of a “Pictorial Values Scale for Children”: A Validity and Reliability Study. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 50, 527–556. https://doi.org/10.34234/ded.1803856

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (52)

  1. Ardyansyah, B., Cordier, R., Brewer, M., & Parsons, D. (2024). A psychometric evaluation of the Indonesian version of the Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool (CPAT) for asses-sing interprofessional education and collaborative practice among health practitioners and students. Narra J, 4(3), e1106. https://doi.org/10.52225/narra.v4i3.1106
  2. Bal, A., & Üdüm, D. (2021). Lise matematik öğretim programını değerlendirmeye yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması: CIPP modeli. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 498–514. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.837341
  3. Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1207–1220.
  4. Buzzi, M., Minary, L., Kestens, Y., Agrinier, N., Ricci, L., & Epstein, J. (2022). Creation and validation of the pictorial ecological momentary well-being instrument (EMOWI) for ado-lescents. Quality of Life Research, 31(6), 1849–1858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03077-9
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2020). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (28. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  6. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  7. Casado, F. and Rundle‐Thiele, S. (2015). Breaking it down: unpacking children’s lunchboxes. Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers, 16(4), 438-453. https://doi.org/10.1108/yc-03-2015-00513
  8. Carlsson, E., Hüls, A., Myrén, D., Jansson, A., & Larsson, A. (2024). Child-health nurses' experiences from using pictorial support with families within child-health services in Sweden. Acta Paediatrica, 113(8), 1884–1890. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.17303
  9. Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., & Algesheimer, R. (2015). The stability and change of value structure and priorities in childhood: a longitudinal study. Social Development, 25(3), 503-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12147
  10. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.
  11. Çamlı, A., Vîrlănuța, F., Palamutçuoğlu, B., Bărbuţă-Mişu, N., Güler, Ş., & Züngün, D. (2021). A study on developing a communicative rational action scale. Sustainability, 13(11), 6317. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116317
  12. Daniel, E., Dys, S., Buchmann, M., & Malti, T. (2015). Developmental trajectories of social justice values in adolescence: relations with sympathy and friendship quality. Social Deve-lopment, 25(3), 548-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12146
  13. Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nur-sing Research, 5(4), 194–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4
  14. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  15. Duman, G. S. (2014). Evaluation of turkish preschool curriculum objectives in terms of values education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 978-983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.353
  16. Flowers, A., Carroll, J., Green, G., & Larson, L. (2014). Using art to assess environmental education outcomes. Environmental Education Research, 21(6), 846-864. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.959473
  17. Gömleksiz, M. N., & Cürebal, İ. (2008). İlköğretim 4. ve 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin bazı değerlere ilişkin algılarının değerlendirilmesi. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 6(16), 25–46.
  18. Grusec, J. E., & Kuczynski, L. (1997). Parenting and children’s internalization of values. New York, NY: Wiley
  19. Inan, H. Z., Jozwiak, M., Inan, Y. S., & Sarac, S. (2024). Examining concept development classroom interaction quality and children's developmental progress in state pre-K/head start programs using pre-K CLASS and LAP-3. Acta Psychologica, 245, 104201.
  20. İnan, H. Z. (2011). Okulöncesi eğitim programında değerler eğitiminin kapsamı. In A. Arıkan (Ed.), Okulöncesi dönemde değerler eğitimi (pp. 95–122). Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  21. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  22. Johansson, E., Cobb‐Moore, C., Brownlee, J., Walker, S., Boulton‐Lewis, G., & Ailwood, J. (2014). Children's perspectives on values and rules in australian early education. Australa-sian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(2), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911403900203
  23. Karasar, N. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (31. baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  24. Kayıran, D. & Bagçeci, B. (2018). Needs Analysis on Values Education Programme for Presc-hool Students, Journal of Education and Training Studies, vol. 6, no. 10.
  25. Kayıran, D., & Bağçeci, B. (2025). Effectiveness of a Values Education Program for Preschool Students: A Teacher-Based Evaluation Study. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 8(3), 61-94.
  26. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
  27. LeGear, M., Greyling, L., Sloan, E., Bell, R., Williams, B., Naylor, P., … & Temple, V. (2012). A window of opportunity? motor skills and perceptions of competence of children in kin-dergarten. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-29
  28. Maćkiewicz, M. and Cieciuch, J. (2016). Pictorial personality traits questionnaire for children (pptq-c)—a new measure of children's personality traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00498
  29. Meydan, H. (2022). Teorik açıdan değerler (Tanım, sınıflandırma ve eğitim). In A. Öz (Ed.), Erken çocuklukta ahlak ve değer eğitimi (pp. 1–23). Nobel Yayıncılık.
  30. Morano, M., Bortoli, L., Ruiz, M., Vitali, F., & Robazza, C. (2019). Self-efficacy and enjoy-ment of physical activity in children: Factorial validity of two pictorial scales. PeerJ, 7, e7402. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7402
  31. Norcia, A., Bombi, A., Pinto, G., & Cannoni, E. (2022). The student’s drawing of teacher’s pictorial value as a predictor of the student–teacher relationship and school adjustment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1006568
  32. Nucci, L. P. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Özyazıcı, K., Boğa, E., Alagöz, N., Varlıklıöz, K., Arslan, Z., Akto, S., & Sağlam, M. (2021). Duyuların gelişimi ve duyu bütünleme. Gelişim ve Psikoloji Dergisi, 2(4), 209-226.
  34. Prinsen, C., Mokkink, L., Bouter, L., Alonso, J., Patrick, D., de Vet, H., & Terwee, C. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1147–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
  35. Ramos, S., Paintsil, E., Ofori-Atta, A., Kusah, J., Amissah, K., Alhassan, A.,. & Reynolds, N. (2019). Prototype development, usability, and preference of a culturally-relevant picto-rial aid to facilitate comprehension of Likert-type levels of agreement in caregivers of child-ren living with HIV in Ghana. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 38(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/cin.0000000000000584
  36. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
  37. Schwab, S., Hellmich, F., & Görel, G. (2017). Self-efficacy of prospective Austrian and Ger-man primary school teachers regarding the implementation of inclusive education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 17(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12379
  38. Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explications and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 137–182.
  39. Sharps, M., Thomas, E., & Blissett, J. (2020). Using pictorial nudges of fruit and vegetables on tableware to increase children's fruit and vegetable consumption. Appetite, 144, 104457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104457
  40. Sokugawa, S. (2022). The ever-growing need of social emotional learning in school-aged child-ren. The European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 20-34. https://doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.309
  41. Tang, T., Wong, M., Li, J., & Chan, D. (2024). Development and initial validation of the health-related quality of life pictorial inventory for children (HEALTH-PIC). Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4609586/v1
  42. Tang, T., Wong, M., Li, J., & Chan, D. (2024). Pictures versus words: can we use a pictorial scale to measure child health-related quality of life? Frontiers in Public Health, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1398944
  43. Tavşancıl, E. (2014). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi (5. baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  44. Thornberg, R. and Oğuz, E. (2013). Teachers’ views on values education: a qualitative study in sweden and turkey. International Journal of Educational Research, 59, 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.03.005
  45. Tondeur, J., Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2007). Towards a typology of computer use in primary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00205.x
  46. Türkoğlu, B. (2019). Opinions of pre-school teachers and pre-service teachers on values educa-tion in the pre-school period: the case of konya province. Pegem Eğitim Ve Öğretim Dergi-si, 9(2), 381-412. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2019.012
  47. Vecchione, M., Döring, A., Alessandri, G., Marsicano, G., & Bardi, A. (2015). Reciprocal rela-tions across time between basic values and value‐expressive behaviors: A longitudinal study among children. Social Development, 25(3), 528-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12152
  48. Wang, L., Chen, C., & Zhu, L. (2014). Picture norms for chinese preschool children: name ag-reement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Plos One, 9(3), e90450.
  49. Watkins, L. and Aitken, R. (2024). The nature and development of children’s consumer compe-tence: evidence from the aisles. Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible Mar-keters, 26(1), 116-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/yc-05-2024-2080https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090450
  50. Yelling, M., Lamb, K., & Swaine, I. (2002). Validity of a pictorial perceived exertion scale for effort estimation and effort production during stepping exercise in adolescent children. Eu-ropean Physical Education Review, 8(2), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x020082007
  51. Yurdugül, H. (2005). Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında kapsam geçerliği için kapsam geçerlik indekslerinin kullanılması. In XIV. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi Bildirileri. Denizli: Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi.
  52. Ramos, S., Paintsil, E., Ofori-Atta, A., Kusah, J., Amissah, K., Alhassan, A.,. & Reynolds, N. (2019). Prototype development, usability, and preference of a culturally-relevant picto-rial aid to facilitate comprehension of Likert-type levels of agreement in caregivers of child-ren living with HIV in Ghana. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 38(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/cin.0000000000000584