SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

An Evaluation of the Performances of Czech and Slovak Economies During the Transition Period

Piyasa Ekonomisine Geçiş Döneminde Çek ve Slovak Ekonomilerinin Genel Performansının Değerlendirilmesi

Rahmi ÇETİN
Pages
121–136
Publication Date
2013-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article evaluates the relationship between media ethics and public credibility in them, and as a solution to the problem, it proposes setting up a new „Media Ethics Watch Committee‟ to improve better implementation of ethical standards in media organisations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ethical journalism or broadcasting is widely used terms by media institutions to improve their public credibility and increase their power on public or political institutions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Yet, due to economic, social or political concerns of media organisations, ethics are often twisted to be able to serve their political or financial interests.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article evaluates the relationship between media ethics and public credibility in them, and as a solution to the problem, it proposes setting up a new „Media Ethics Watch Committee‟ to improve better implementation of ethical standards in media organisations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Medya Etiği · Etiksel Habercilik · Etiksel Gazetecilik

Abstract

Ethical journalism or broadcasting is widely used terms by media institutions to improve their public credibility and increase their power on public or political institutions. Yet, due to economic, social or political concerns of media organisations, ethics are often twisted to be able to serve their political or financial interests. As a result of such ill-actions or ill-considerations media organisations have been gradually losing the trust of public in them. This article evaluates the relationship between media ethics and public credibility in them, and as a solution to the problem, it proposes setting up a new „Media Ethics Watch Committee‟ to improve better implementation of ethical standards in media organisations.

Özet

“Etiksel habercilik” terimi basılı, görsel ve işitsel medyanın kamuoyu üzerindeki etkilerini artırmak için sıkça kullandıkları kavramlar arasındadır. Ancak medya sektöründe yer alan kişi ve kurumların etik kurallara uyumlu yayıncılık yapmalarını çoğu zaman olumsuz etkileyen sosyal, ekonomik veya politik birçok faktörlerin devreye girebilmesi ile bu kurallara uyum sorunları sıkça yaşanabilmektedir. Diğer taraftan, medyada etiksel değerlerden uzaklaşma ile ortaya çıkan durum bu tür kurumların kamuoyu nezdindeki güvenilirlik derecelerini negatif olarak etkilediğinden ortaya çelişkili bir amaç-sonuç ilişkisi tablosu çıkabilmektedir. Bu yazı medyada etik kurallara uyumlu yayıncılık ile kamuoyunda güvenilirlik kazanma ilişkilerini irdelemekte ve medyada etiksel ilkelere uygun yayıncılığın teşvik edilebilmesi açısından bağımsız ve tarafsız bir „Medya Etiği Takip Kurulu‟ oluşturulmasını önermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, R. (2013). An Evaluation of the Performances of Czech and Slovak Economies During the Transition Period. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 121–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/111601

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Altheide, D. L. (1993). “Electronic Media and State Control: The Case of Azscam”. The Sociological Quarterly, Vol. 43, No: 1, ss. 53-69.
  2. Arant, D, ed. (1999), Perspectives: Ethics, Issues and Controversies in Mass Media. Coursewise Publishing, St. Paul, MN. Avşar, Z. (2001), Medyada Klasik Etik Kodları Bir İllüzyon mu?, I. Ulusal Uygulamalı Etik Kongresi Kitabı, ODTÜ, Felsefe Bölümü, 12-13 Kasım 2001, ss. 112-132
  3. Barut, B. (2001),
  4. Türk Basınında Etik, I. Ulusal Uygulamalı Etik Kongresi Kitabı, ODTU, Felsefe Bölümü, 12-13 Kasım 2001, ss. 112-132
  5. Bennett, W. L. and Paletz, D. L. (1994), Taken by Storm: Media, Public Opinion and U.S. Foreign Policy in the Gulf War, University of Chicago Press,
  6. Chicago. Bennett, W.L., Gressett, L. and Haltom W. (1985), Repairing the News: A Case Study of the News Paradigm, Journal of Communication, Vol. 35, No: 2, ss. 50–68.
  7. Berkman, R.I. and Christopher A.S. (2003), Digital Dilemmas: Ethical Issues for Online Media Professionals. Iowa State Press,
  8. Ames. Berry, D., ed. (2000),
  9. Ethics and Media Culture, Focal Press,
  10. Woburn, MA: Bertrand, C.J. (2003), An Arsenal for Democracy: Media Accountability Systems, Hampton Press.
  11. Cresskill, NJ. Boeyink, D.E. and Sandra L.B. (2010), Making Hard Choices in Journalism Ethics: Cases and Practice, Routledge, New York. Carruthers, S. L. (2000), The Media at War: Communication and Conflict in the Twentieth Century, McMillan Press Ltd., London. Chomsky, N. and Herman, E S. (2006), Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, Vintage, New York. Clifford, C. and Traber, M. (eds.), (1997), Communication Ethics and Universal Values, Sage Publication, London. Couch, C. J. (1990), Mass Communications and Stale Structures, The Social Science Journal, Vol, 27, ss. 111 -128. Elliott D.C. and Elliott, D. (eds), (1998), Journalism Ethics: A Reference Handbook, Abc-Clio, Santa Barbara (CA). Entman, R. M. (2004), Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy, University of Chicago Press,
  12. Chicago. GfK Group (2007), GfK Trust Index 2007,
  13. GfK Group, Nürnberg. Gordon A.D. and Kittross, J. M. (1999),
  14. Controversies in Media Ethics, Addison Wesley, New York. Gunter, B. (1987), Television and Perceptions of Crime: The British Experience, in Television and the Fear of Crime, ss. 67-89,
  15. John Libbey, London. Hall, P.M. (1988),
  16. Asymmetry, Information Control, and Information Technology, pp. 341-356, in Communication and Social Structure, edited by D. R. Maines and C. J. C