Journals / Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

The Effect Of Financial Development On Economic Growth In Brıcs-T Countries

Brıcs-T Ülkelerinde Finansal Gelişmenin Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisi

Pages
343–357
Publication Date
2020-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In terms of the countries that make up the panel, it has been found that the feedback hypothesis is valid in the Chinese economy and the demand-following hypothesis in the Brazilian economy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The interaction between financial development and economic growth is a topic that is frequently discussed in the theory of economics theoretically and empirically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Located in this study in the period between 1988-2017 developing countries Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and Turkey has been tested relationship between financial developments and economic growth with panel data analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In terms of the countries that make up the panel, it has been found that the feedback hypothesis is valid in the Chinese economy and the demand-following hypothesis in the Brazilian economy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ekonomik Büyüme · Finansal Gelişme · Panel Veri

Abstract

The interaction between financial development and economic growth is a topic that is frequently discussed in the theory of economics theoretically and empirically. While there is consensus about the existence of the relationship between the variables, it is possible to come across different views in terms of the direction of the relationship. Located in this study in the period between 1988-2017 developing countries Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and Turkey has been tested relationship between financial developments and economic growth with panel data analysis. As a result of empirical findings, it is seen that supply leading hypothesis in the short term and feedback hypothesis in the long term are valid for the whole panel. In terms of the countries that make up the panel, it has been found that the feedback hypothesis is valid in the Chinese economy and the demand-following hypothesis in the Brazilian economy.

Özet

Finansal gelişme ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki etkileşim iktisat teorisinde teorik ve ampirik olarak sıkça tartışılan bir konudur. Bu çalışmada 1988-2017 arası dönemde gelişmekte olan ülkeler arasında yer alan Brezilya, Rusya, Hindistan, Çin, Güney Afrika ve Türkiye ekonomilerinde finansal gelişme ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki panel veri analiz yöntemi ile test edilmiştir. Ampirik bulgular sonucunda, panelin tamamı için kısa dönemde arz itişli ve uzun dönemde geri besleme hipotezlerinin geçerli olduğu görülmektedir. Paneli oluşturan ülkeler açısından Çin ekonomisinde geri besleme hipotezinin, Brezilya ekonomisinde ise talep itişli hipotezin geçerli olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGÜR, H., ÖZEK, Y. (2020). The Effect Of Financial Development On Economic Growth In Brıcs-T Countries. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 343–357. https://ajindex.com/articles/111439

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Andrés, J., Hernando, I. and LopezSalido, D. (2004), ‘The Role of the Financial System in the Growth–inflation Link.’ European Journal of Political Economy, 20 (4), 941–961.
  2. Asteriou, D., & Spanos, K. (2019). The relationship between financial development and economic growth during the recent crisis: Evidence from the EU. Finance Research Letters, 28, 238-245.
  3. Bayat, T., Kayhan, S., & Senturk, M. (2012). Budget Deficits And İnterest Rates: An Empirical Analysis For Turkey. Eurasian Journal Of Business And Economics, 5(9), 119-128.
  4. Bayat, T., Özcan, B., & Taş, Ş. (2015). Türkiye’de Döviz Kuru Geçiş Etkisinin Asimetrik Nedensellik Testleri ile Analizi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 10(2), 7-30.
  5. Breusch, T., Pagan, A., 1980. The Lagrange multiplier test and its application to model specification in econometrics. Rev. Econ. Stud. 47, 239–253.
  6. Caporale, G. M., Rault, C., Sova, R., & Sova, A. (2009). Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from ten new EU members (Brunel University Economics and Finance Working Paper Series, No. 09-37).
  7. Ductor, L. and Grechyna, D. (2015), ‘Financial development, real sector, and economic growth.’ International Review of Economics & Finance, 37, 393-405.
  8. Emirmahmutoğlu, F. And Kose, N. (2011), “Testing for Granger Causality in Heterogeneous Mixed Panels”, Economic Modelling, 28, 870–876.
  9. Ergeç, E. H. (2004). Finansal gelişme ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi ve Türkiye örneği: 1988-2001. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2). Erkişi, K. (2018). Financial Development and Economic Growth in BRICS Countries and Turkey: A Panel Data Analysis. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 1-17.
  10. Fuınhas, J., Fılıpe, M., Belucıo M., Marques, A., (2019), “The Nexus between Financial Development and Economic Growth: Evidence from European Countries", Journal of Economics Studies and Research, Vol. 2019 (2019)
  11. Gregorio, J. D., & Guidotti, P. E. (1995). Financial development and economic growth. World Development, 23(3), 433-448.
  12. Guru, B. K., & Yadav, I. S. (2019). Financial development and economic growth: panel evidence from BRICS. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science. Hayaloğlu, P. (2015). Kırılgan beşli ülkelerinde finansal gelişme ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Dinamik panel veri analizi. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(11), 131-144.
  13. Helhel, Y. (20