✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
Apart from that subject we also indicated the historical bases of polemic.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The polemic between Muslims and Christianities has been continued during centuries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At this period tahrif was one of the main subjects.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Apart from that subject we also indicated the historical bases of polemic.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Polemik · Tahrif · Milel ve Nihal
Abstract
The polemic between Muslims and Christianities has been continued during centuries. At this period tahrif was one of the main subjects. Christian theologian Pfander and Muslim scholar Rahmetullah argued into this subject. We have tried indicating their arguments. Apart from that subject we also indicated the historical bases of polemic.
Özet
Polemik Müslümanlar ve Hıristiyanlar arasında yüzyıllardır devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte en önemli tartışma konusu “Tahrif” olmuştur. Hıristiyan teolog Pfander ve Müslüman âlim Rahmetullah bu konu üzerinde tartışmışlardır. Bu makalede onların argümanları değerlendirilecektir. Ayrıca polemiğin tarihsel temelleri üzerinde de duracağız.
Keywords
🔖
Cite This Article
YAVUZ, S. S., YENİÇAĞ, İ. (2009). Distortion in Terms of Polemic between Muslims and Christianities. Milel ve Nihal, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 305–344. https://ajindex.com/articles/111354