SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Eczacılık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 44 Sayı: 2

APPLICATION OF AHP METHOD FOR THE SELECTION OF PHARMACEUTICAL WAREHOUSE LOCATION

ECZA DEPOSU YERİ SEÇİMİNDE AHS YÖNTEMİNİN UYGULANMASI

Miray Arslan(VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ECZACILIK FAKÜLTESİ, ECZACILIK MESLEK BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, ECZACILIK İŞLETMECİLİĞİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0003-2786-4610
Pages
253–264
Publication Date
2020-05-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Objective: The primary purpose of this study is to find a solution to the warehouse location selection problem of a pharmaceutical warehouse serving in the pharmaceutical industry by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The primary purpose of this study is to find a solution to the warehouse location selection problem of a pharmaceutical warehouse serving in the pharmaceutical industry by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: The primary purpose of this study is to find a solution to the warehouse location selection problem of a pharmaceutical warehouse serving in the pharmaceutical industry by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Objective: The primary purpose of this study is to find a solution to the warehouse location selection problem of a pharmaceutical warehouse serving in the pharmaceutical industry by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:analitik hiyerarşi süreci · ecza deposu · yer seçimi

Abstract

Objective: The primary purpose of this study is to find a solution to the warehouse location selection problem of a pharmaceutical warehouse serving in the pharmaceutical industry by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, eczacılık sektöründe hizmet sunmakta olan bir ecza deposunun ecza deposu yeri seçim problemine Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHS) yöntemi ile çözüm bulmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arslan, M. (2020). APPLICATION OF AHP METHOD FOR THE SELECTION OF PHARMACEUTICAL WAREHOUSE LOCATION. Ankara Üniversitesi Eczacılık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 44 Sayı: 2, 253–264. https://doi.org/10.33483/jfpau.709528

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. Ergün, G.Ü.L., Tamer, E.R.E.N. (2017). Lojistik dağıtım ağ problemlerinde analitik hiyerarşi prosesi yöntemi ve hedef programlama ile depo seçimi. Harran Üniversitesi Mühendislik Dergisi. 2(1), 1-13.
  2. Kolinski A. (ed.), Logistics Management - modern development trends, CHAPTER 4 ROLE OF WAREHOUSE SPACE IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN Poznan School of Logistics Press, Poznan 2016; DOI: 10.17270/B.M.978-83-62285-25-9.2.4. pp.147-164.
  3. Singh, R.K, Chaudhary, N., Saxena, N. (2018). Selection of warehouse location for a global supply chain: A case study. Indian Institute of Management Bangalore.30, 343–356. 4. Tengilimoğlu, D., Yiğit, V. (2017). Sağlık işletmelerinde tedarik zinciri ve malzeme yönetimi. 3. Baskı. Ankara; Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  4. Erdin, C., Akbaş, H.E. (2019). A comparative analysis of fuzzy topsis and geographic information systems (gis) for the location selection of shopping malls: A case study from Turkey. Sustainability, 11(14), 3837.
  5. Uysal, F., Tosun, Ö. (2012). Selection of Sustainable Warehouse Location in Supply Chain Using the Grey Approach. 3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 - June 01 2012, Sarajevo. 383-390.
  6. Aktepe, A., Ersöz, S. (2014). AHP-VIKOR ve MOORA Yöntemlerinin Depo Yeri Seçim Probleminde Uygulanması. Endüstri Mühendisliği, 25(1), 2-15.
  7. Cömert, S. E., Yener, F. (2017). Bir Gida Firmasi İçin Bulanik Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi İle Depo Yeri Seçimi. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2(2), 161-177.
  8. Chen, C. (2009). A Decision Model of Field Depot Location Based on the Centrobaric Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). International Journal of Business and Managament. 4, 71–75.
  9. Karmaker, C.L., Saha, M. (2015). Optimization of warehouse location through fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods. Decision Science Letters.4, 315–334.
  10. Jaberidoost, M., Olfat, L., Hosseini, A., Kebriaeezadeh, A., Abdollahi, M., Alaeddini, M., Dinarvand, R. (2015). Pharmaceutical supply chain risk assessment in Iran using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and simple additive weighting (SAW) methods. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice. 8(1), 9.
  11. Velmurugan, R., Selvamuthukumar, S. (2012). The analytic network process for the pharmaceutical sector: Multi-criteria decision making to select the suitable method for the preparation of nanoparticles. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 20(1), 59.
  12. Bahmani, N., Blumberg, H. (1987). Consumer Preference and Reactive Adaptation to a Corporate Solution of the Over-The-Counter Medication Dilemma-An Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis. Math. Modelling. 9(6), 293-298.
  13. Elahi, F., Muqtadir, A., Anam, S., Mustafiz, K. (2017). Pharmaceutical Product Selection: Application of AHP. International Journal of Business and Management. 12(8),193-200.
  14. Oey, E., Nitihardjo, E.C. (2016). Selecting Regional Postponement Centre Using PESTLE-AHP-TOPSIS Methodology: A Case Study in a Pharmaceutical Company. Global Business Review, 17(5), 1250-1265.
  15. Enyinda, E.A. (2010). A Model for Quantifying Strategic Supplier Selection: Evidence from a Generic Pharmaceutical Firm Supply Chain. International Journal of Business, Marketing and Decision Sciences. 3(2), 23-44.
  16. Yıldırım, B.F. (2018). Çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerine giriş. İçinde: E. Önder ve B.F. Yıldırım (Eds.), Sağlık yönetiminde karar verme-I, (s. 1-8). Bursa: Dora Yayıncılık.
  17. Önder G., Önder E. (2018). Analitik Hiyerarşi süreci. İçinde: B.F. Yıldırım, E. Önder. (Eds.), Çok Kriterli Karar verme yöntemleri, (s. 21-64). Bursa: Dora Yayıncılık.
  18. Saaty, T.L. (2000). Fundamentals of Decision Making ve Priority Theory with The Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications.
  19. Kuruüzüm A., Atsan N. (2001). Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi ve İşletmecilik Alanındaki Uygulamaları. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 1(1), 83-105.
  20. Chandran B., Golden B., Wasil E. (2005). Linear Programming Models For Estimating Weights in The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Computers and Operations Research. 32(9), 2235-2254.
  21. Ömürbek N., Şimşek A. (2014). Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ve Analitik Ağ Süreci Yöntemleri ile Online Alışveriş Site Seçimi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(22), 306-327.
  22. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  23. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı İlaç ve Eczacılık Genel Müdürlüğü Geneşgesi Sayı: 48196. Tarih: 22 Ekim 1999. İlâçlar ve Ecza Deposunda Bulundurulan Ürünler İle İlgili İyi Dağıtım ve Muhafaza Uygulamaları Kılavuzu.
  24. Fechner, I. (2009). Determinants of warehouse space market development in Poland. LogForum. 5(1), 3.
  25. Kuo, R.J., Chi, S.C., Kao, S.S. (2002). A decision support system for selecting convenience store location through integration of fuzzy AHP and artificial neural network. Computers in industry. 47(2), 199-214.
  26. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı İlaç ve Eczacılık Genel Müdürlüğü Geneşgesi Sayı: 48196. Tarih: 22 Ekim 1999. İlâçlar ve Ecza Deposunda Bulundurulan Ürünler İle İlgili İyi Dağıtım ve Muhafaza Uygulamaları Kılavuzu.