Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Eczacılık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 45 Sayı: 3

ASSISTANT PHARMACIST PRACTICES IN TURKEY: PHARMACISTS’ PERSPECTIVES

TÜRKİYE’DE YARDIMCI ECZACILIK UYGULAMASI: ECZACILARIN PERSPEKTİFİ

Sinan Bulut(Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Sağlık Yönetimi Bölümü)0000-0001-5893-1762
Emrah Bilgener(Hitit Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Sağlık Yönetimi Bölümü)0000-0001-9916-3800
Pages
491–503
Publication Date
2021-09-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Objective: In tis study, it was aimed to evaluate the opinions of pharmacists who are the owners and responsible managers of community pharmacy and pharmacists who graduated after 2018 and were exposed to restrictions on the "Assistant Pharmacy Practices" in the Law No. 6308.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In tis study, it was aimed to evaluate the opinions of pharmacists who are the owners and responsible managers of community pharmacy and pharmacists who graduated after 2018 and were exposed to restrictions on the "Assistant Pharmacy Practices" in the Law No. 6308.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: In tis study, it was aimed to evaluate the opinions of pharmacists who are the owners and responsible managers of community pharmacy and pharmacists who graduated after 2018 and were exposed to restrictions on the "Assistant Pharmacy Practices" in the Law No. 6308.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Objective: In tis study, it was aimed to evaluate the opinions of pharmacists who are the owners and responsible managers of community pharmacy and pharmacists who graduated after 2018 and were exposed to restrictions on the "Assistant Pharmacy Practices" in the Law No. 6308.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yardımcı eczacılık uygulaması · eczacı · eczacılık işletmeciliği

Abstract

Objective: In tis study, it was aimed to evaluate the opinions of pharmacists who are the owners and responsible managers of community pharmacy and pharmacists who graduated after 2018 and were exposed to restrictions on the "Assistant Pharmacy Practices" in the Law No. 6308.

Özet

Amaç: Bu araştırmada Türkiye’de toplum eczanesi sahibi ve mesul müdürü olan eczacılar ile 2018 yılından itibaren mezun olup kısıtlamalara maruz kalan eczacıların 6308 sayılı kanunda yer alan “Yardımcı Eczacılık Uygulaması” hakkındaki görüşlerini değerlendirmek amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bulut, S., Bilgener, E. (2021). ASSISTANT PHARMACIST PRACTICES IN TURKEY: PHARMACISTS’ PERSPECTIVES. Ankara Üniversitesi Eczacılık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 45 Sayı: 3, 491–503. https://doi.org/10.33483/jfpau.930368

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Karayaman M. (2008). Türkiye’de eczane sayılarının sınırlandırılmasına ilişkin düzenlemeler ve sonuçları, Osmanlı Bilimi Araştırmaları,10(1):115-135
  2. Arslan M, Tarhan N, Şar S. (2020). Yardımcı Eczacılık Uygulamasının, Eczacılık Fakültesi Öğrencileri Perspektifinden GZFT Analizi ile Değerlendirilmesi: Odak Grup Çalışması, Lokman Hekim Dergisi, 10 (1): 70-76, Doi:10.31020/mutftd.612203
  3. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.3.1262.pdf (erişim tarihi 04.04.2021)
  4. http://www.istanbulsaglik.gov.tr/w/sb/ecz/mevzuat/mevzuatPdf/6197kanun.pdf (erişim tarihi 04.04.2021)
  5. T.C. Resmi Gazete (2012). Eczacılar ve Eczaneler Hakkında Kanun ile Uyuşturucu Maddelerin Murakabesi Hakkında Kanunda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun., Kanun no: 6308. 17 Mayıs 2012. Sayı: 28309. Başbakanlık Basımevi. Ankara
  6. http://www.ilachaberaktuel.com/fakulte-sayisi-artiyor-istihdam-yerinde-sayiyor/ (erişim tarihi: 08.04.2021)
  7. http://www.aeo.org.tr/DuyuruModulu/Duyurular/Details/41258?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1 (erişim tarihi: 08.04.2021)
  8. https://www.teb.org.tr/news/8401/50-OLDU-ECZACILIK-MESLE%C4%9E%C4%B0-%C4%B0%C3%87%C4%B0N-TEHL%C4%B0KE-%C3%87ANLARI-%C3%87ALIYOR(erişim tarihi: 08.04.2021)
  9. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2012/05/20120531-3.htm (erişim tarihi: 08.04.2021)
  10. Vermeulen LC, Rough SS, Thielke TS, Shane RR, Ivey MF, Woodward BW, et al. (2007). Strategic approach for improving the medication-use process in health systems: the high-performance pharmacy practice framework. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 64:1699-1710. doi:10.2146/ajhp060558
  11. Massachusetts Collage of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (MCPHS) University Course Catalog (2020-2021). Sayfa 299-305
  12. The legal and regulatory framework for community pharmacies in the WHO European Region. (2019), WHO
  13. Çalıkuşu, M. Özçelikay, G. (2020). Türkiye’de Eczacılık Mesleğinin Gelecek İşgücü Kapasitesinin Analizi, Editör: Gülbin Özçelikay& İlkay Yıldız, Eczacılıkta Yenilikler-3 (145 -156). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi. ISBN:978-605-136-491-9.
  14. Bilgener E, Ünal A. (2019). Eczacılık Hizmetlerinden Memnuniyetin Belirlenmesi Çorum İli Örneği. Journal of Faculty of Pharmacy of Ankara University, 43 (3), 259-273. DOI: 10.33483/jfpau.480903
  15. Adepu R, Nagavi BG. (2006). General practitioners’ perceptionsabout the ex-tendedroles of the communitypharmacists in the State of Karnataka: A study. Indian J PharmSci; 68: 36-40
  16. Van Wijk BLG, Klungel O.H, Heerdink E.R, de Boer A. (2005).Effectiveness of interventionsbycommunitypharmaciststoimprovepatientadherencetochronicmedication: Asystematicreview. Annals Pharmacotherapy,39,319-328
  17. Karaca G, Kıran B. (2016). Occupational Problems of Public Hospital Pharmacists. Marmara Pharm. J; 20(2): 191-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.12991/mpj.20162037389
  18. Bilgener E, Ünal A. (2019). Eczacılık Hizmetlerinden Memnuniyetin Belirlenmesi Çorum İli Örneği. Journal of Faculty of Pharmacy of Ankara University, 43 (3), 259-273. DOI: 10.33483/jfpau.480903