Objective: In tis study, it was aimed to evaluate the opinions of pharmacists who are the owners and responsible managers of community pharmacy and pharmacists who graduated after 2018 and were exposed to restrictions on the "Assistant Pharmacy Practices" in the Law No. 6308.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In tis study, it was aimed to evaluate the opinions of pharmacists who are the owners and responsible managers of community pharmacy and pharmacists who graduated after 2018 and were exposed to restrictions on the "Assistant Pharmacy Practices" in the Law No. 6308.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: In tis study, it was aimed to evaluate the opinions of pharmacists who are the owners and responsible managers of community pharmacy and pharmacists who graduated after 2018 and were exposed to restrictions on the "Assistant Pharmacy Practices" in the Law No. 6308.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Objective: In tis study, it was aimed to evaluate the opinions of pharmacists who are the owners and responsible managers of community pharmacy and pharmacists who graduated after 2018 and were exposed to restrictions on the "Assistant Pharmacy Practices" in the Law No. 6308.
Objective: In tis study, it was aimed to evaluate the opinions of pharmacists who are the owners and responsible managers of community pharmacy and pharmacists who graduated after 2018 and were exposed to restrictions on the "Assistant Pharmacy Practices" in the Law No. 6308.
Özet
Amaç: Bu araştırmada Türkiye’de toplum eczanesi sahibi ve mesul müdürü olan eczacılar ile 2018 yılından itibaren mezun olup kısıtlamalara maruz kalan eczacıların 6308 sayılı kanunda yer alan “Yardımcı Eczacılık Uygulaması” hakkındaki görüşlerini değerlendirmek amaçlanmıştır.
Bulut, S., Bilgener, E. (2021). ASSISTANT PHARMACIST PRACTICES IN TURKEY: PHARMACISTS’ PERSPECTIVES. Ankara Üniversitesi Eczacılık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 45 Sayı: 3, 491–503. https://doi.org/10.33483/jfpau.930368
Karayaman M. (2008). Türkiye’de eczane sayılarının sınırlandırılmasına ilişkin düzenlemeler ve sonuçları, Osmanlı Bilimi Araştırmaları,10(1):115-135
Arslan M, Tarhan N, Şar S. (2020). Yardımcı Eczacılık Uygulamasının, Eczacılık Fakültesi Öğrencileri Perspektifinden GZFT Analizi ile Değerlendirilmesi: Odak Grup Çalışması, Lokman Hekim Dergisi, 10 (1): 70-76, Doi:10.31020/mutftd.612203
T.C. Resmi Gazete (2012). Eczacılar ve Eczaneler Hakkında Kanun ile Uyuşturucu Maddelerin Murakabesi Hakkında Kanunda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun., Kanun no: 6308. 17 Mayıs 2012. Sayı: 28309. Başbakanlık Basımevi. Ankara
Vermeulen LC, Rough SS, Thielke TS, Shane RR, Ivey MF, Woodward BW, et al. (2007). Strategic approach for improving the medication-use process in health systems: the high-performance pharmacy practice framework. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 64:1699-1710. doi:10.2146/ajhp060558
Massachusetts Collage of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (MCPHS) University Course Catalog (2020-2021). Sayfa 299-305
The legal and regulatory framework for community pharmacies in the WHO European Region. (2019), WHO
Çalıkuşu, M. Özçelikay, G. (2020). Türkiye’de Eczacılık Mesleğinin Gelecek İşgücü Kapasitesinin Analizi, Editör: Gülbin Özçelikay& İlkay Yıldız, Eczacılıkta Yenilikler-3 (145 -156). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi. ISBN:978-605-136-491-9.
Bilgener E, Ünal A. (2019). Eczacılık Hizmetlerinden Memnuniyetin Belirlenmesi Çorum İli Örneği. Journal of Faculty of Pharmacy of Ankara University, 43 (3), 259-273. DOI: 10.33483/jfpau.480903
Adepu R, Nagavi BG. (2006). General practitioners’ perceptionsabout the ex-tendedroles of the communitypharmacists in the State of Karnataka: A study. Indian J PharmSci; 68: 36-40
Van Wijk BLG, Klungel O.H, Heerdink E.R, de Boer A. (2005).Effectiveness of interventionsbycommunitypharmaciststoimprovepatientadherencetochronicmedication: Asystematicreview. Annals Pharmacotherapy,39,319-328
Bilgener E, Ünal A. (2019). Eczacılık Hizmetlerinden Memnuniyetin Belirlenmesi Çorum İli Örneği. Journal of Faculty of Pharmacy of Ankara University, 43 (3), 259-273. DOI: 10.33483/jfpau.480903