SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Eczacılık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 47 Sayı: 1

A YOUTH VIEW ON INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION: STUDENT OPINIONS ON SIMULATION PRACTICES

MESLEKLER ARASI EĞİTİME GENÇ BAKIŞ: SİMÜLASYON UYGULAMASINA YÖNELİK ÖĞRENCİ GÖRÜŞLERİ

Bilge Sözen Şahne(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ECZACILIK FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-0746-8303
Elif Ulutaş(ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ECZACILIK FAKÜLTESİ, ECZACILIK PR.)0000-0001-7257-9224
Leyla Yumrukaya(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ECZACILIK FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-3382-2794
Melih Elçin(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, TIP PR.)0000-0002-1652-906X
Selen Yeğenoğlu(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ECZACILIK FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-5217-8797
Pages
76–85
Publication Date
2023-01-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Objective: In this study, we aimed to bring together the pharmacy and pharmacy technician students via interprofessional simulation practices, to know each other and to discover their opinions about this practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we aimed to bring together the pharmacy and pharmacy technician students via interprofessional simulation practices, to know each other and to discover their opinions about this practice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: In this study, we aimed to bring together the pharmacy and pharmacy technician students via interprofessional simulation practices, to know each other and to discover their opinions about this practice.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Objective: In this study, we aimed to bring together the pharmacy and pharmacy technician students via interprofessional simulation practices, to know each other and to discover their opinions about this practice.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Eczacılık · meslekler arası eğitim · meslekler arası iş birliği

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to bring together the pharmacy and pharmacy technician students via interprofessional simulation practices, to know each other and to discover their opinions about this practice.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, eczacılık ve eczane teknikerliği öğrencilerinin meslekler arası simülasyon uygulaması ile bir araya getirilerek birbirlerini tanımaları ve bu uygulamaya ilişkin ilgili görüşlerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şahne, B. S., Ulutaş, E., Yumrukaya, L., Elçin, M., Yeğenoğlu, S. (2023). A YOUTH VIEW ON INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION: STUDENT OPINIONS ON SIMULATION PRACTICES. Ankara Üniversitesi Eczacılık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 47 Sayı: 1, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.33483/jfpau.1167299

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Goolsarran, N., Hamo, C.E., Lane, S., Frawley, S., Lu, W.H. (2018). Effectiveness of an interprofessional patient safety team-based learning simulation experience on healthcare professional trainees. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 1-8. [CrossRef]
  2. Reeves, S., Clark, E., Lawton, S., Ream, M., Ross, F. (2017). Examining the nature of interprofessional interventions designed to promote patient safety: a narrative review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 29(2), 144-150. [CrossRef]
  3. Dener, H., Elçin, M. (2015). Mesleklerarası öğrenme hakkında Hacettepe Üniversitesi doktor ve hemşireleri ile tıp ve hemşirelik öğrencilerinin hazırbulunuşluk düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi, 29(2), 109-117. [CrossRef]
  4. Pevnick, J.M., Nguyen, C., Jackevicius, C.A., Palmer, K.A., Shane, R., Cook-Wiens, G., Rogatko, A., Bear, M., Rosen, O., Seki, D., Boyle, B., Desai, A., Bell, D.S. (2018). Improving admission medication reconciliation with pharmacists or pharmacy technicians in the emergency department: A randomised controlled trial. BMJ Quality & Safety, 27(7), 512-520. [CrossRef]
  5. World Health Organization Web site. (1997). Erişim adresi https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/63817 Erişim tarihi: 10.04.2022
  6. Sam, A.T., Parasuraman, S. (2015). The Nine-Star Pharmacist: An Overview. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 4, 281-284. [CrossRef]
  7. Resmi Gazete Web site. (2014). Erişim adresi https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=19696&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5 Erişim tarihi: 10.04.2022
  8. Bosch, B., Mansell, H. (2015). Interprofessional collaboration in health care: Lessons to be learned from competitive sports. Canadian Pharmacists Journal, 148(4), 176-179. [CrossRef]
  9. Bridges, D.R., Davidson, R.A., Odegard, P.S., Maki, I.V., Tomkowiak, J. (2011). Interprofessional collaboration: Three best practice models of interprofessional education. Medical Education Online, 16(1), 6035. [CrossRef]
  10. Centre For The Advancement of Interprofessional Education Web site. (2022). Erişim adresi https://www.caipe.org/ Erişim tarihi: 23.06.2022
  11. Fernandez, R., Parker, D., Kalus, J.S., Miller, D., Compton, S. (2007). Using a human patient simulation mannequin to teach interdisciplinary team skills to pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(3), 51. [CrossRef]
  12. Sözen-Şahne, B., Ulutaş-Deniz, E., Yeğenoğlu, S. (2017). Eczacılık eğitiminde simülasyon uygulamaları. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Education-Special Topics, 2(2), 81-85.
  13. Vyas, D., Bray, B.S., Wilson, M.N. (2013). Use of simulation-based teaching methodologies in us colleges and schools of pharmacy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(3), 53. [CrossRef]
  14. Onan, A., Turan, S. (2017). Mezuniyet öncesinde mesleklerarası eğitim. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Education-Special Topics, 2(2), 111-116.
  15. Mıdık, Ö., Kartal, M. (2010). Simülasyona dayalı tıp eğitimi. Marmara Medical Journal, 23(3), 389-399.
  16. Horsburgh, M., Lamdin, R., William, E. (2001). Multiprofessional learning: The attitudes of medical, nursing and pharmacy students to shared learning. Medical Education, 35, 876-883. [CrossRef]
  17. Buring, S.M., Bhushan, A., Broeseker, A., Conway, S., Duncan-Hewitt, W., Hansen, L., Westberg, S. (2009). Interprofessional education: Definitions, student competencies, and guidelines for implementation. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(4), 59. [CrossRef]
  18. Marion-Martins, A.D. Pinho, D.L. (2020). Interprofessional simulation effects for healthcare students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 104568. [CrossRef]
  19. Epps, C.A., Britt, T., Palaganas, J.C. (2020). Using health care simulation for interprofessional education and practice. In: J. Palaganas, B. T. Ulrich, M. E. Mancini (Eds.), Mastering Simulation: A Handbook for Success (pp. 151-175). Indianapolis: Sigma Theta Tau International.
  20. Sarmasoğlu, S., Elçin, M., Masiello, I. (2018). Eğiticilerin başarılı mesleklerarası eğitim programlarına ilişkin deneyimleri: Karolinska Enstitüsü örneği. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), 14-28. [CrossRef]
  21. Bolesta, S., Chmil, J.V. (2014). Interprofessional education among student health professionals using human patient simulation. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(5), 94. [CrossRef]
  22. Mohaupt, J., van Soeren, M., Andrusyszyn, M., MacMillan, K., Devlin-Cop, S., Reeves, S. (2012). Undestanding interprofessional relationships by the use of contact theory. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26(5), 370-375. [CrossRef]
  23. Davies, M., Schonder, K., Meyer, S.M., Hall, D.L. (2015). Changes in student performance and confidence with a standardized patient and standardized colleague interprofessional activity. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(5), 69. [CrossRef]
  24. Zimbardi, K., Colthope, K., Dekker, A., Engstrom, C., Bugarcic, A., Worhty, P., Chunduri, P., Lluka, L., Long, P. (2017). Are they using my feedback? The extent of students' feedback use has a large impact on subsequent academic performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 625-644. [CrossRef]
  25. Shah, M., Pabel, A. (2020). Making the student voice count: Using qualitative student feedback to enhance the student experience. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(2), 194-209. [CrossRef]
  26. Mandouit, L. (2018). Using student feedback to improve teaching. Educational Action Research, 26(5), 755-769. [CrossRef]
  27. Albanese, N.P., Rouse, M.J., Schlaifer, M. (2010). Scope of contemporary pharmacy practice: Roles, responsibilities, and functions of pharmacists and pharmacy technicians. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 50, e35-e69. [CrossRef]
  28. Koehler, T., Brown, A. (2017). A global picture of pharmacy technician and other pharmacy support workforce cadres. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 13, 271-279. [CrossRef]
  29. Khan, K., Pattison, T., Sherwood, M. (2011). Simulation in medical education. Medical Teacher, 33, 1-3. [CrossRef]
  30. Boztepe, H., Terzioğlu, F. (2015). Sağlık eğitiminde mesleklerarası eğitim. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(3), 222-228.
  31. Göriş, S., Bilgi, N., Korkut-Bayındır, S. (2014). Hemşirelik eğitiminde simülasyon kullanımı. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(2), 25-29.
  32. Çetinkaya-Uslusoy, E. (2018). Hemşirelik eğitiminde simülasyon kullanımı: Öğrencilerin görüşleri. SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(2), 13-18. [CrossRef]
  33. Atatürk Üniversitesi Eczacılık Fakültesi Web site (2018). Erişim adresi https://atauni.edu.tr/tr/mesleki-beceri-ve-iletisim-laboratuvari-simulasyon-eczanesi-acilisi-yapildi- Erişim Tarihi: 23.06.2022
  34. Gülpınar, G., Özçelikay, G. (2021). Development of a structured communication and counseling skills course for pharmacy students: A simulation-based approach. Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18, 176-184. [CrossRef]
  35. Fejzic, J., Barker, M., Hills, R., Priddle, A. (2016). Communication capacity building through pharmacy practice simulation. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(2), 28. [CrossRef]