SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İDEALKENT / 2026 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 43

Determination of the Effect of Ecological Corridors on Microclimate and Air Pollution Distribution; The Case of Erzurum

Ekolojik Koridorların Mikro İklim ve Hava Kirliliği Dağılımı Üzerindeki Etkisinin Belirlenmesi; Erzurum Örneği

Doğan Dursun(ATATURK UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-3791-0027
Merve Yavaş(ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4340-4174
Journal
İDEALKENT
Pages
180–218
Publication Date
2024-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the proposed ecological corridors improve air quality in the surrounding urban built environment, reduce pollution, but cause a decrease in thermal comfort values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In Erzurum, where the relationship between climate and urbanisation processes is problematic and negatively affects living conditions, it is necessary to prepare adaptation strategies for spatial planning by determining data such as wind movements, inversion, thermal comfort, air pollution and microclimate values and to produce climate simulations for the future.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results show that the proposed ecological corridors improve air quality in the surrounding urban built environment, reduce pollution, but cause a decrease in thermal comfort values.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is thought that the results will provide exemplary findings in determining the effects of ecological corridors on thermal comfort conditions and air pollution distribution for our cities.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İklim değişikliği · Hava kirliliği · Erzurum

Abstract

In Erzurum, where the relationship between climate and urbanisation processes is problematic and negatively affects living conditions, it is necessary to prepare adaptation strategies for spatial planning by determining data such as wind movements, inversion, thermal comfort, air pollution and microclimate values and to produce climate simulations for the future. In the study carried out in this context, concrete results and tools based on simulations of ecological corridors and their effects are presented to solve the air pollution problem in Erzurum and to improve the quality of life by protecting human health. The research method is to determine the effects of two ecological corridors, which are proposed to be opened by considering the covered streamlines, on the air pollution and local microclimate conditions around them through simulation maps produced by ENVI-met software. The results show that the proposed ecological corridors improve air quality in the surrounding urban built environment, reduce pollution, but cause a decrease in thermal comfort values. In addition, the proposed ecological corridors provide ventilation opportunities, restoration of the closed streamline is proposed, and high-density urban development is prevented. It is thought that the results will provide exemplary findings in determining the effects of ecological corridors on thermal comfort conditions and air pollution distribution for our cities.

Özet

İklimle kentleşme süreçleri arasındaki ilişkinin sorunlu olduğu ve yaşam koşullarını olumsuz etkilediği Erzurum kentinde, rüzgâr hareketleri, inversiyon, termal konfor, hava kirliliği ve mikro iklim değerleri gibi verilerin belirlenerek mekânsal planlama için uyum stratejilerinin hazırlanması ve geleceğe dair iklim simülasyonlarının üretilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu kapsamda yapılan çalışma ile, Erzurum’da hava kirliliği probleminin çözümü ve insan sağlığını koruyarak yaşam kalitesinin yükseltilmesi amacıyla ekolojik koridor önerilerine dayalı simülasyonlar yapılmış ve etkilerine dair somut sonuçlar ve araçlar ortaya konmuştur. Araştırma yöntemi, Erzurum kenti içerisindeki üzeri kapatılmış dere hatlarını dikkate alarak açılması önerilen iki ekolojik koridorun, çevresindeki hava kirliliği ve yerel mikro iklim koşullarına etkilerinin ENVI-met programı aracılığıyla üretilen simülasyon haritaları üzerinden belirlenmesi şeklindedir. Sonuçlar, öneri ekolojik koridorların çevresindeki kentsel yapılı çevrede hava kalitesini iyileştirdiği, kirliliği azalttığı ancak termal konfor değerlerinde düşüşe neden olduğunu göstermiştir. Ek olarak öneri ekolojik koridorlar ile havalandırma imkânı sağlanmış, kapalı dere hattının restorasyonu önerilmiş, yüksek yapı yoğunluğuna sahip kentsel gelişme engellenmiştir. Sonuçların kentlerimiz için ekolojik koridor uygulamalarının mikro iklime bağlı termal konfor koşulları ve hava kirliliği dağılımı üzerindeki etkilerinin belirlenmesinde örnek teşkil edecek bulgular ortaya koyacağı düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dursun, D., Yavaş, M. (2024). Determination of the Effect of Ecological Corridors on Microclimate and Air Pollution Distribution; The Case of Erzurum. İDEALKENT, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 43, 180–218. https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.1410063

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (96)

  1. AB. (2008). “Directive 2008/50/EC of The European Parliament and of The Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe”, Official Journal of the European Union L 152/1, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. adresinden alındı
  2. Abhijith, K.V., Kumar, P., Gallagher, J., McNabola, A., Baldauf, R., Pilla, F., Broderick, B., DiSabatino, S., & Pulvirenti, B. (2017). Air pollution abatement performances of green infrastructure in open road and built-up street canyon environments– a review. Atmospheric Environment, 162, 71–86.
  3. Aghamolaei, R.,. Azizi, M.M., Aminzadeh, B., & O’Donnell, J. (2022). A comprehensive review of outdoor thermal comfort in urban areas: Effective parameters and approaches. Energy & Environment, 34(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X22111
  4. Ali-Toudert, F., & Mayer, H. (2007). Effects of asymmetry, galleries, overhanging façades and vegetation on OHTCCs in urban street canyons. Solar Energy, 81, 742–754. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2006.10.007
  5. Alkan, A. (2018). Hava Kirliliğinin Ciddi Boyutlara Ulaştığı Kentlere Bir Örnek: Siirt. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2), 641–666. Erişim tarihi: 2 Ekim 2023, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/bitlissos/issue/ 41200/475981
  6. Aw, J., & Kleeman, M. J. (2003). Evaluating the first-order effect of intraannual temperature variability on urban air pollution. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, 4365. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002688
  7. Bealey, W.J., McDonald, A.G., Nemitz, E., Donovan, R., Dragosits, U., Duffy, T.R., & Fowler, D. (2007). Estimating the reduction of urban PM10 concentrations by trees within an environmental information system for planners. Journal of Environmental Management, 85, 44-58.
  8. Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., & Zhang, X. Y. (2013). Clouds and aerosols. Climate change 2013: The physical science basis, in: Contribution of working group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 571–657). Cambridge University Press.
  9. Bruse, M., & Fleer, H. (1998). Simulating surface-plant-air interactions inside urban environments with a three-dimensional numerical model. Environmental Modelling and Software, 13(3–4), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1364-8152(98)00042-5
  10. Bruse, M. (2018). “ENVI-met 4.4: A Microscale Urban Climate Model”, http://www. envi-met.info
  11. Burian, S. J., & Shepherd, J. M. (2005). Effect of urbanization on the diurnal rainfall pattern in Houston. Hydrological Processes, 19, 1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5647
  12. Cariñanos, P., Casares-Porcel, M. (2011). Urban green zones and related pollen allergy:a review. Some guidelines for designing spaces with low allergy impact. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101, 205–214.
  13. Cavanagh, J.A.E., Clemons, J. (2006). Do urban forests enhance air quality? Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 13,120-130.
  14. Charlson, R. J., Schwartz, S. E., Hales, J. M., Cess, R. D., Coakley, J. A., Jr., Hansen, J. E., & Hofmann, D. J. (1992). Climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols. Science, 255, 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.255.5043.423
  15. Chen, L., Zhang, M., Zhu, J., Wang, Y., & Skorokhod, A. (2018). Modeling impacts of urbanization and urban heat island mitigation on boundary layer meteorology and air quality in Beijing under different weather conditions. Journal of the Geological Society Australia, 123, 4323– 4344. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027501
  16. Chow, W. T. L., Pope, R. L., Martin, C. A., & Brazel, A. J. (2011). Observing and modeling the nocturnal park cool island of an arid city: Horizontal and vertical impacts. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 103(1), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-010-0293-8
  17. Civerolo, K., Hogrefe, C., Lynn, B., Rosenthal, J., Ku, J.-Y., Solecki, W., Cox, J., Small, C., Rosenzweig, C., Goldberg, R., Knowlton, K., & Kinney, P. (2007). Estimating the effects of increased urbanization on surface meteorology and ozone concentrations in the New York City Metropolitan Region. Atmospheric Environment, 41, 1803–1818.
  18. Cortes, A., Rejuso A.J., Santos, J.A., & Blanco, A. (2022). Evaluating mitigation strategies for urban heat island in Mandaue City using ENVI-met. Journal of Urban Management, 11(1), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2022.01.002
  19. Çamur, K.C., Dursun, D., & Kaya, A.B. (2023). Agricultural land change, planning and urbanisation: a case study from Erzurum, Türkiye (1940–2022), Planning Perspectives, 38(6), 1233-1255. doi: 10.1080/02665433.2023.2187440
  20. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı-ÇŞB. (2020). Erzurum İli Temiz Eylem Planı. Erzurum: Erzurum Çevre ve Şehircilik İl Müdürlüğü.
  21. Deng, S., Ma, J., Zhang, L., Jia, Z., & Ma, L. (2019). Microclimate simulation and model optimization of the effect of roadway green space on atmospheric particulate matter. Environmental Pollution, 246, 932-944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.026
  22. Dursun, D., Yavaş, M., & Yılmaz, S. (2020). Soğuk İklim Bölgesinde Kamusal Alanda Tasarım Önerilerinin Mikro-İklim Yönünden Değerlendirmesi: Yakutiye Meydanı Örneği. Megaron, 15(2), 321-331.
  23. Dursun, D., & Yavaş, M. (2020). Thermal Comfort Effects of New Urban Development Projects: The Case of Erzurum. Production of Climate Responsive Urban Built Environments, 8-14. İstanbul: İstanbul Policy Center.
  24. Dursun, D., & Yavaş, M. (2015). Climate-Sensitive Urban Design in Cold Climate Zone: The City of Erzurum, Turkey. International review for spatial planning and sustainable development, 17-38.
  25. Dursun, D., & Yavaş, M., (2014). Climatic Urban Design: Configuring Ventilation Channels in Urban Area, Erzurum, Turkey, Third International Conference on Countermeasures to Urban Heat Island Bildiriler Kitabı içinde, Ekim 13-15, Venedik.
  26. Dursun, D., Yavaş, M., & Güller, C. (2016). The Level of Integration among Climate Issues, Urban Planning and Local Government Policies for the Winter City Erzurum. Planlama, 26(2), 147-159.
  27. Dursun D., Yilmaz S., Yilmaz H., Irmak M. A., Demir M., & Yavaş M. (2015). Hava Kirliliğinde Ekolojik Koridor Senaryoları Erzurum Kenti Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayını - 1119, Erzurum.
  28. Ebrahimnejad, R., Noori, O., & Deihimfard, R. (2017). Mitigation potential of green structures on local urban microclimate using ENVI-met model. International Journal of Urban Sustainable, 9(3), 274-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2017.1370424
  29. Eisenman, T.S., Churkina, G., Jariwala, S.P., Kumar, P., Lovasi, G.S., Pataki, D.E., Weinberger, K.R., & Whitlow, T.H. (2019). Urban trees, air quality, and asthma: an interdisciplinary review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 187, 47-59.
  30. Elraouf, R.A., ELMokadem, A., Megahed, N., Eleinen, O.A., & Eltarabily, S. (2022). Evaluating urban outdoor thermal comfort: a validation of ENVI-met simulation through field measurement. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 15(2), 268-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2022.2046165
  31. Fallmann, J., Forkel, R., & Emeis, S. (2016). Secondary effects of urban heat island mitigation measures on air quality. Atmospheric Environment, 125, 199–211. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.094
  32. Gallagher, J., Baldauf, R., Fuller, C.H., Kumar, P., Gill, L.W., & McNabola, A. (2015). Passive methods for improving air quality in the built environment: are view of porousand solid barriers. Atmospheric Environment, 120, 61–70.
  33. Grifoni, R.C., Passerini, G., & Pierantozzi, M. (2013). Assessment of outdoor thermal comfort and its relation to urban geometry. WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment, 173. doi:10.2495/SDP130011
  34. Gulyás, Á., Unger, J., & Matzarakis, A. (2006). Assessment of the microclimatic and human comfort conditions in a complex urban environment: modelling and measurements. Building and Environment, 41(12), 1713–1722.
  35. Harris, T.B., & Manning, W.J. (2010). Nitrogen dioxide and ozone levels in urban tree canopies. Environmental Pollution, 158, 2384-2386.
  36. HKDYY. (2008). T.C. Başbakanlık, Hava Kalitesi Değerlendirme ve Yönetimi Yönetmeliği. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=12188&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5 adresinden alındı
  37. Irmak, M. A., Yılmaz, S., & Dursun, D. (2017). Effect of different pavements on human thermal comfort conditions. Atmosfera, 30(4), 355-366.
  38. Jamei, E., & Rajagopalan, P. (2019). Effect of street design on pedestrian thermal comfort. Architectural Science Review, 62(2), 92–111.
  39. Jiang, X., Wiedinmyer, C., Chen, F., Yang, Z.-L., Lo, J., & C.- F. (2008). Predicted impacts of climate and land use change on surface ozone in the Houston, Texas, Area. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, D20312. https:// doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009820
  40. Kalnay, E., & Cai, M. (2003). Impact of urbanization and land-use change on climate. Nature, 423, 528–531. https://doi. org/10.1038/nature01675
  41. Khaniabadi, Y. O., Sicard, P., Takdastan, A., Hopke, P. K., Taiwo,A. M., Khaniabadi, F. O., Marco, A. D., & Daryanoosh, M. (2019). Mortality and morbidity due to ambient air pollution in Iran. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 7(2), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2018.06.006
  42. Kara, G. (2012). Kentsel Hava Kirleticilerine Meteorolojinin Etkisi: Konya Örneği. S.Ü. Müh.-Mim. Fak. Dergisi, 27(3), 73–86. Erişim tarihi: 2 Ekim 2023, https:// dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/215749
  43. Kara G., Yalçınkaya B., Özdil B., & Avcı, E. (2018). Konya İlinin Hava Kirliliğine Bazı Meteorolojik Faktörlerin Etkisi. Ulusal Çevre Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 1(2), 104–109. Erişim tarihi: 2 Ekim 2023, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/downl oad/article-file/512363
  44. Kocaman, S., Zaman, S., Kara, F., & Keçeli, A. (2008). Erzurum kentinde gecekondu önleme ve kentsel dönüşüm çalışmaları. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, (18), 179–210. Erişim tarihi: 2 Ekim 2023, https://dergipark.org. tr/tr/pub/marucog/issue/465/3751
  45. Koçak, E. (2018). Aksaray Kentinin PM10 ve SO2 Konsantrasyonlarinin Zamansal Değişimi: Koşullu İki Değişkenli Olasilik Fonksiyonu ve K-Means Kümeleme. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 6(3), 471–478. https://doi. org/10.21923/jesd.426741
  46. Kopar, İ., & Zengin, M. (2009). Coğrafi faktörlere bağlı olarak erzurum kentinde hava kalitesinin zamansal ve mekânsal değişiminin belirlenmesi. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi, (53), 51–69. Erişim tarihi: 2 Ekim 2023, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tcd/issue/21228/228416
  47. Kumara, P., Druckman, A., Gallagher, J., Gatersleben, B., Allison, S., Eisenman, T.S., Hoang, U., Hama, S., Tiwari, A., Sharma, A., Abhijith, K.V., Adlakha, D., McNabola, A., Astell-Burt, T., Feng, X., Skeldon, A.C., Lusignane, S., & Morawska, L. (2019). The nexus between air pollution, green infrastructure and human health. Environment International, 133, 105181
  48. Kusumastuty, K.D., Poerbo, H.W., & Koerniawan, M.D. (2018). Climate-sensitive urban design through Envi-Met simulation: case study in Kemayoran, Jakarta. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 129. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/129/1/012036
  49. Krüger, E. L., Minella, F. O., & Rasia, F. (2011). Impact of urban geometry on outdoor OHTCCs and air quality from field measurements in Curitiba. Brazil. Building and Environment, 46(3), 621–634. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.buildenv.2010.09.006
  50. Lee, A.C.K., & Maheswaran, R. (2011). The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. Journal of Public Health, 33, 212-222.
  51. Li, Y., Zhang, J., Sailor, D., & Ban-Weiss, G. (2019). Effects of urbanization on regional meteorology and air quality in Southern California. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19, 4439–4457.
  52. Lippmann, M. (1989). Health effects of ozone. A Critical Review. JAPCA, 39(5), 672–695. https://doi.org/10. 1080/08940630.1989.10466554
  53. Litschke, T., Kuttler, W. (2008). On the reduction of urban particle concentration by vegetation-A review. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 17, 229-240.
  54. Locosselli, G.M., Camargo, E. P., Lopes Moreira, T.C., Todesco, E., Andrade, M.F., André, C.D., André, P.A., Singer, J.M., Ferreira, L.S., Saldiva, P.H.N., & Buckeridge, M.S. (2019). The role of air pollution and climate on the growth of urban trees. Science of the Total Environment, 666, 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.291
  55. López-Cabeza, V.P., Galán-Marín, C., Rivera-Gómez, C., & Roa-Fernández, J. (2018). Courtyard microclimate ENVI-met outputs deviation from the experimental data. Building and Environment, 144, 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.08.013
  56. Maggiotto, G., Buccolieri, R., Santo, M. A., Leo, L. S., & Di Sabatino, S. (2014). Study of the urban heat island in Lecce (Italy) by means of ADMS and ENVI-MET. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 55(1–4), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEP.2014.065903
  57. MGM. (2023). Meteroloji Genel Müdürlüğü verisi. https://www.mgm.gov.tr/ Matzarakis, A., Mayer, H., Iziomon, M.G. (1999). Applications of a universal thermal index: physiological equivalent temperature. International Journal of Biometerology, 43, 76-84
  58. Matzarakis, A., & Mayer, H. (1996). Another kind of environmental stress: Thermal stress. WHO collaborating centre for Air Quality Management and Air pollution Control. Newsletters, 18, 7–10.
  59. Mayer, H., & Höppe, P. (1987). Thermal comfort of man in different urban environments. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 38(1), 43–49.
  60. McDonald, P.J., Aptaker, P.S., Mitchell, J., & Mulheron, M. (2007). A unilateral NMR magnet for sub-structure analysis in the built environment: the surface GARField. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 185, 1-11.
  61. Menteşe, S., & Tağıl, Ş. (2012). Bilecik’te İklim Elemanlarının Hava Kirliliği Üzerine Etkisi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15(28), 3–16. Erişim tarihi: 2 Ekim 2023, from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/baunsobed/ issue/50183/645979
  62. Mohammadjavad, M., Hadis, S., & Nina, M. (2018). An ENVI-met Simulation Study on Influence of Urban Vegetation Congestion on Pollution Dispersion. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 15(2), 187-194. doi: 10.3233/AJW-180031
  63. Ng, E., Chen, L., Wang, Y., & Yuan, C. (2012). A study on the cooling effects of greening in a high-density city: An experience from Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 47, 256– 271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.07.014
  64. Nowak, D. J., Hirabayashi, S., Doyle, M., McGovern, M., & Pasher, J. (2018). Air pollution removal by urban forests in Canada and its effect on air quality and human health. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 29, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.10.019
  65. Nowak, D.J., Crane, D.E., Stevens, J.C. (2006). Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 4, 115-123.
  66. Oğuz, K. (2020). Nevşehir ilinde hava kalitesinin ve meteorolojik faktörlerin hava kirliliği üzerine etkilerinin incelenmesi. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Doğal Afetler Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Doğal Afetler ve Çevre Dergisi, 6(2), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.21324/dacd.686052
  67. Özdemir, H. (2019). Mitigation impact of roadside trees on fine particle pollution. Science of the Total Environment, 659, 1176–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.262
  68. Pataki, D.E., Carreiro, M.M., Cherrier, J., Grulke, N.E., Jennings, V., Pincetl, S., Pouyat, R.V., Whitlow, T.H., & Zipperer, W.C. (2011). Coupling biogeochemical cycles in urban environments: ecosystem services, green solutions, and misconceptions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 27–36.
  69. Pope, C. A., & Dockery, D. W. (2006). Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: Lines that connect. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 56(6), 709–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485. PMID: 16805397.
  70. Potchter, O., Cohen, P., Lin, T.P., & Matzarakis, A. (2018). Outdoor human thermal perception in various climates: a comprehensive review of approaches, methods and quantification. Science of the Total Environment 631, 390–406.
  71. Rui, L., Buccolieri, R., Gao, Z., Gatto, E., & Ding, W. (2019). Study of the effect of green quantity and structure on OHTCCs and air quality in an urban like residential district by ENVI-met modelling. Building Simulation, 12, 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-018-0498-9
  72. Salmond, J.A., Tadaki, M., Vardoulakis, S., Arbuthnott, K., Coutts, A., Demuzere, M., Dirks, K.N., Heaviside, C., Lim, S., Macintyre, H., McInnes, R.N., & Wheeler, B.W. (2016). Health and climate related ecosystem services provided by Street trees in the urban environment. Environmental Health, 15, 36.
  73. Selmi, W., Weber, C., Rivière, E., Blond, N., Mehdi, L., & Nowak, D. (2016). Air pollution removal by trees in public green spaces in Strasbourg city, France. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 17, 192–201.
  74. Shaneyfelt, K.M., Anderson, A.R., Kumar, P., Hunt, W.F. (2017). Air quality considerations for storm water green Street design. Environmental Pollution, 231, 768-778.
  75. Shi, Y., Ren, C., Lau, K. K., & Ng, E. (2019). Investigating the influence of urban land use and landscape pattern on PM2.5 spatial variation using mobile monitoring and WUDAPT. Landscape and Urban Planning 189, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.004
  76. Simpson, J.R., McPherson, E.G. (1998). Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space conditioning in Sacramento. Atmospheric Environment, 32, 69-74.
  77. Şişman, E. (2019). Türkiye’de seçilen hava kalitesi i̇zleme istasyonları için eğilim (trend) değerlendirmeleri. Doğal Afetler ve Çevre Dergisi, 5(1), 134–152. https://doi.org/ 10.21324/dacd.444503
  78. Taleghani, M., Clark, A., Swan, W., & Mohegh, A. (2020). Air pollution in a microclimate; the impact of different green barriers on the dispersion. Science of the Total Environment, 711, 134649.
  79. Taleghani, M., Kleerekoper, L., Tenpierik, M., & Van Den Dobbelsteen, A. (2015). Outdoor thermal comfort within five different urban forms in the Netherlands. Building and Environment, 83, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. buildenv.2014.03.014
  80. Tao, W., Liu, J., Ban-Weiss, G. A., Hauglustaine, D. A., Zhang, L., Zhang, Q., Cheng, Y., Yu, Y., & Tao, S. (2015). Effects of urban land expansion on the regional meteorology and air quality of eastern China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15, 8597–8614. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8597-2015
  81. Tsoka, S., Tsikaloudaki, A., & Theodosiou, T. (2018). Analyzing the ENVI-met microclimate model’s performance and assessing cool materials and urban vegetation applications–A review. Sustainable Cities and Society., 43, 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.009
  82. Vahmani, P., Sun, F., Hall, A., & Ban-Weiss, G. (2016). Investigating the climate impacts of urbanization and the potential for cool roofs to counter future climate change in Southern California. Environmental Research Letters, 11, 124027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124027
  83. Van den Berg, A.E., Maas, J., Verheij, R.A., & Groenewegen, P.P. ( 2010). Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 1203–1210.
  84. WAQR. (2020). World Air Quality Report, Region & City PM2.5 Ranking.
  85. WHO. (2005). WHO Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulphur dioxide”, Global update 2005, World Health Organization. World Health Organization: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/69477/WHO_SDE_PHE_OEH_06.02_eng.pdf? sequence=1&isAllowed=y adresinden alındı
  86. Yavaş, M. (2019). “İklim Duyarlı Planlama Stratejileri: Erzurum Örneği”. Doktora Tezi. Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  87. Yavaş, M., Dursun, D., Toy, S. (2023). Simulating the effect of urban sprawl on air quality and outdoor human thermal comfort in a cold city, Erzurum, Turkey, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol.195-11.
  88. Yılmaz, S., Mutlu, E., & Yılmaz, H. (2018). Alternative scenarios for ecological urbanizations using ENVI-met model. Environmental Science And Pollution Research. 25(26), 26307-26321.
  89. Yılmaz, S., Kulekci, E. A., Mutlu, B. E., & Sezen, I. (2021). Analysis of winter thermal comfort conditions: street scenarios using ENVI-met model. Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 28(45), 63837-63859.
  90. Yılmaz, S., Sezen, I., Irmak, M.A., & Külekçi E. (2021). Analysis of outdoor thermal comfort and air pollution under the ınfluence of urban morphology in cold-climate cities: Erzurum/Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 64068–64083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14082-3.
  91. Yılmaz, S., Sezen, I., Irmak, M.A., & Qaid A. (2022). Assessing the effects of different urban landscapes and built environment patterns on thermal comfort and air pollution in Erzurum city, Turkey. Building and Environment, 219, 109210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109210
  92. Yılmaz, S., Menteş, Y., Angın, S. A., & Qaid, A. (2023). Impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on urban air, Land surface temperature and air pollution in cold climate zones. Environmental Research, 237, 116887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116887
  93. Yin, S., Shen, Z., Zhou, P., Zou, X., Che, S., & Wang, W. (2011). Quantifying air pollution attenuation within urban parks: an experimental approach in Shanghai, China. Environmental Pollution, 159, 2155-2163.
  94. Zhang, J., Li, Y., Tao, W., Liu, J., Levinson, R., Mohegh, A., & Ban-Weiss., G. (2018). Investigating the urban air quality effects of cool walls and cool roofs in Southern California. Environmental Science & Technology., 53(13), 7532–7542. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b00626
  95. Kusumastuty, K.D., Poerbo, H.W., & Koerniawan, M.D. (2018). Climate-sensitive urban design through Envi-Met simulation: case study in Kemayoran, Jakarta. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 129. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/129/1/012036
  96. Yılmaz, S., Kulekci, E. A., Mutlu, B. E., & Sezen, I. (2021). Analysis of winter thermal comfort conditions: street scenarios using ENVI-met model. Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 28(45), 63837-63859.