SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İDEALKENT / 2026 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 43

Public Bus Transportation Systems During the Pandemic: Barriers For Passengers with Disabilities

Pandemi Süresinde Halk Otobüsü Sistemleri: Engelli Yolcular İçin Bariyerler

Adnan Varer(YILDIZ TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İNŞAAT FAKÜLTESİ, İNŞAAT MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0001-6532-6210
Güzin Akyıldız Alçura(YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, CIVIL ENGINEERING PR.)0000-0001-7424-2764
Journal
İDEALKENT
Pages
153–179
Publication Date
2024-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

One of the results of the study is that service providers and decision makers should consider a more detailed approach depending on the type of disability in the decision-making process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Participation in employment, education and social life is a critical challenge for people with disabilities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, within the framework of a semi-structured survey, 43 disabled passengers were asked to describe the entire process of bus services, from the stage of obtaining information about the journey to reaching the final destination.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:One of the results of the study is that service providers and decision makers should consider a more detailed approach depending on the type of disability in the decision-making process.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Toplu Taşıma · Engelli Yolcular · Yarı Yapılandırılmış Anketler

Abstract

Participation in employment, education and social life is a critical challenge for people with disabilities. In order to identify the difficulties that disabled people face throughout the day, it is necessary to understand their characteristics and problems realistically. In this study, the obstacles experienced by disabled passengers who prefer bus transportation to meet their transportation needs, especially in physically accessing the transportation system and obtaining information, were examined and focused on how these obstacles took shape during the pandemic period. In the study, within the framework of a semi-structured survey, 43 disabled passengers were asked to describe the entire process of bus services, from the stage of obtaining information about the journey to reaching the final destination. It was focused on what kind of additional obstacles were created to the experiences and difficulties experienced by disabled passengers during the pandemic precaution measures implemented in Istanbul. It has been determined that the pandemic period and subsequent measures have revealed many additional obstacles, such as psychological distress, for disabled passengers, and that the society should be made aware of the unique characteristics of disabled people (for example, disability is not just a physical issue) and other concerns. One of the results of the study is that service providers and decision makers should consider a more detailed approach depending on the type of disability in the decision-making process.

Özet

İstihdama, eğitime ve sosyal hayata katılım, engelliler için kritik bir zorluktur. Engellilerin gün boyunca karşılaştıkları zorlukları tespit etmek için, onların özelliklerini ve sorunlarını gerçekçi bir şekilde anlamak gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmada, ulaşım ihtiyaçlarını karşılamak için otobüsle ulaşımı tercih eden engelli yolcuların özellikle ulaşım sistemine fiziksel olarak erişme ve bilgi edinme konusunda yaşadıkları engeller incelenmiş ve bu engellerin pandemic döneminde nasıl şekil aldığına odaklanılmıştır. Çalışmada yarı yapılandırılmış bir anket çalışması çerçevesinde 43 engelli yolcudan otobüs seferleri hakkında, yolculuğa dair bilgi edinme aşamasından nihai varış noktasına varana kadar tüm süreci nitelendirmeleri istenmiştir. İstanbul'da uygulanan pandemi önlem tedbirleri esnasında engelli yolcuların yaşadıkları deneyim ve zorluklara ne tür ek engeller yarattığı üzerinde durulmuştur. Pandemi dönemi ve müteakip tedbirlerin engelli yolcular için psikolojik sıkıntı gibi birçok ek engeli ortaya çıkardığı ve toplumun engelli kişilerin kendilerine özgü özellikler (örneğin engelliliğin sadece fiziksel yani dışlarıdan görünen bir konu olmadığı) ve diğer endişeleri konusunda bilinçlendirilmesi gerektiği tespit edilmiştir. Hizmet sağlayıcı ve karar vericilerin, karar verme sürecinde engellilik türüne bağlı olarak daha ayrıntılı bir yaklaşımı göz önünde bulundurması gerektiği de çalışmanın sonuçlarındandır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Varer, A., Alçura, G. A. (2024). Public Bus Transportation Systems During the Pandemic: Barriers For Passengers with Disabilities. İDEALKENT, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 43, 153–179. https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.1333521

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Aldersey, H. M., Quadir, M. M., Akter, S., Mozumder, R. H., Nazneen, N., & Nuri, R. P. (2018). Barriers and facilitators for wheelchair users in Bangladesh: A participatory action research project. Disability CBR & Inclusive Development, 29, 24-44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5463/dcid.v29i2.730
  2. Anaby, D., Hand, C., Bradley, L., DiRezze, B., Forhan, M., DiGiacomo, A., & Law, M. (2013). The Effect of the Environment on Participation of Children, and Youth with Disabilities: A Scoping Review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(19), 1589-1598. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.748840
  3. Babinard, Wang, R. Bennett, & Mehndiratta, S. (2012). Accessibility of urban transport for people with disabilities and limited mobility: Lessons from East Asia and the Pacific. World Bank. World Bank. Retrieved from https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/932371468234283368/pdf/779690BRI0Box30C00TRN0440ADD0VC0KNS.pdf
  4. Banister, D., & Bowling, A. (2004). Quality of life for the elderly: The transport dimension. Elsevier Transport Policy, 11(2), 105-115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00052-0
  5. Beck, M. J., & Hensher, D. A. (2020a). nsights into the impact of COVID-19 on household travel and activities in Australia – The early days under restrictions. Transp Policy, 96, 76-93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.07.001
  6. Beck, M. J., & Hensher, D. A. (2020b). Insights into the impact of COVID-19 on household travel and activities in Australia – The early days of easing restrictions. Transport Policy, 95-119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.08.004
  7. Bezyak, J. L., Sabella, S. A., & Gattis, R. H. (2017). Public transportation: An investigation of barriers for people with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 1(28), 52-60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207317702070
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London & New York: Routledge.
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  10. Choak, C. (2011). Asking questions: interviews and evaluations. In C. F. Bradford S., Research and Research Methods for Youth Practitioners (p. 23). London: Routledge.
  11. Cochran, A. L. (2020). Impacts of COVID-19 on access to transportation for people with disabilities. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100263
  12. de Haas, M., Faber, R., & Hamersma, M. (2020). How COVID-19 and the Dutch intelligent lockdown' change activities, work and travel behaviour: Evidence from longitudinal data in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100150
  13. Erten, Ş. & Aktel, M. (2020). Engellilerin erişilebilirlik hakkı: Engelsiz kent yaklaşımı. Süleyman Demirel University Visionary Journal, 11(28), pp. 898-912. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.691690
  14. F Bromley, R. D., Matthews, D. L., & Thomas, C. J. (2007). City centre accessibility for wheelchair users: The consumer perspective and the planning implications. Cities 24 - The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, 3(24), 229-241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2007.01.009
  15. Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering Semi-structured Intervied and Beyond. New York University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814732939.001.0001
  16. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?:An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x05279903
  17. IETT, Istanbul Electric Tram and Tunnel Administration. (2020, 12 07). İETT pandemide yoğunluğu azaltmak için sefer sayılarını artırdı. Retrieved 11 24, 2021, from https://iett.istanbul/tr/main/news/iett-pandemide-yogunlugu-azaltmak-icin-sefer-/2435
  18. Jansuwan, S., Christensen, K. & Chen, A. (2013). Assessing the transportation needs of low-mobility individuals: Case study of a small urban community in Utah. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 139(2), 104-114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.00001
  19. Jenelius, E., & Cebecauer, M. (2020). Impacts of COVID-19 on public transport ridership in Sweden: Analysis of ticket validations, sales and passenger counts. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3641536
  20. Jenkins, G., Yuen, H., & Vogtle, L. (2015). Experience of multisensory environments in public space among people with visual impairment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(8), 8644-8657. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120808644
  21. Mafatlane, G. R., Fidzani, L. C., & Gobotswang, K. S. (2014). Wheelchair users as consumers: accessibility of supermarkets in Gaborone, Botswana. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(2), 94-100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12155
  22. Meyers, A. R., Anderson, J. J., Miller, D. R., Shipp, K., & Hoenig, H. (2002). Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: sbstantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. Social Science & Medicine, 8(55), 1435-1446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00269-6
  23. Namey, E., Guest, G., McKenna, K., & Chen, M. (2016). Evaluating bang for the buck: A cost-effectiveness comparison between individual interviews and focus groups based on thematic saturation levels. American Journal of Evaluation, 3(37), 425-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214016630406
  24. Park, J., & Chowdhury, S. (2017). nvestigating the barriers in a typical journey by public transport users with disabilities. Journal of Transport & Health, 10, 361-368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.05.008
  25. Rantakokko, M., M. Manty, and T. Rantanen. (2012). Mobility Decline in Old Age. American College of Sports Medicine, Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 41(1), 19-25. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3182556f1e
  26. Roitman, S. (2010). Gated communities: definitions, causes and consequences. Urban Design and Planning, 163(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.2010.163.1.31
  27. Rojek, C. (2000). Indexing, Dragging and the Social Construction of Tourist Sights. In C. R. Urry, Touring Cultures. Transformation of Travel and Theory (pp. 52-74). New York: Routledge.
  28. Rosenbloom, S. (2007). Transportation Patterns and Problems of People with Disabilities. In I. o. America, M. J. Field, & A. M. Jette (Eds.), The Future of Disability in America (pp. 145-152). Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
  29. Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. SAGE Publishing. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452226651
  30. Shakibaei, S., de Jong, G. C., Alpkökin, P., & Rashidi, T. H. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel behavior in Istanbul: A panel data analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society, 65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102619
  31. Shamshiripour, A., Rahimi, E., Shabanpour, R., & Mohammadian, A. K. (2020). How is COVID-19 reshaping activity-travel behavior? Evidence from a comprehensive survey in Chicago. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perpectives, 7, 100216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100216
  32. Velho, R., Holloway, C., Symonds, A., & Balmer, B. (2016). The effect of transport accessibility on the social inclusion of wheelchair users: A mixed method analysis. Transport Policy and Social Inclusion, 4(3), 24-35. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/si.v4i3.484
  33. WHO. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. WHO.
  34. Babinard, Wang, R. Bennett, & Mehndiratta, S. (2012). Accessibility of urban transport for people with disabilities and limited mobility: Lessons from East Asia and the Pacific. World Bank. World Bank. Retrieved from https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/932371468234283368/pdf/779690BRI0Box30C00TRN0440ADD0VC0KNS.pdf
  35. IETT, Istanbul Electric Tram and Tunnel Administration. (2020, 12 07). İETT pandemide yoğunluğu azaltmak için sefer sayılarını artırdı. Retrieved 11 24, 2021, from https://iett.istanbul/tr/main/news/iett-pandemide-yogunlugu-azaltmak-icin-sefer-/2435