SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İDEALKENT / 2024 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 46

“A Home Away from Home”: The Case of the Yurt Homeland Association in Gebze

“Memleketten Uzakta Bir Memleket”: Yurt Hemşehri Derneği Örneği

Hasan Ali Yılmaz(SİNOP ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3105-6691
Journal
İDEALKENT
Pages
2711–2732
Publication Date
2024-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ultimately, the spatial analysis of fellow townsmen associations demonstrates that the associations are not merely a physical structure; they are also an emotional labour, the implementation of which, objects, and interactions play a crucial role.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article addresses the question of how hometown associations (HTAs, hereafter) transform into meaningful spaces, or homes, for internal migrant groups in Turkey and how they are perceived within this context.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Utilising ethnographic research conducted from 2013 to 2018 and a review of existing literature on the topic of 'home' studies, this study examines how migrants create a sense of 'home' in HTAs, with a particular focus on the role of face-to-face interactions, objects, and practices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ultimately, the spatial analysis of fellow townsmen associations demonstrates that the associations are not merely a physical structure; they are also an emotional labour, the implementation of which, objects, and interactions play a crucial role.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Göç · hemşehri dernekleri · mekân

Abstract

This article addresses the question of how hometown associations (HTAs, hereafter) transform into meaningful spaces, or homes, for internal migrant groups in Turkey and how they are perceived within this context. While previous research has primarily focused on the functions, transnational and translocal interactions, and contributions of HTAs to the migrants’ origin, spatial factors have often been overlooked. Utilising ethnographic research conducted from 2013 to 2018 and a review of existing literature on the topic of 'home' studies, this study examines how migrants create a sense of 'home' in HTAs, with a particular focus on the role of face-to-face interactions, objects, and practices. The research findings demonstrate that the transformation of HTAs into a 'home' is achieved through the actions of the association leaders and the utilisation of home-making practices and objects. These processes and interactions are crucial for fostering a sense of familiarity and comfort among migrants. Furthermore, the article underscores that migrants seek this sense of belonging, which significantly influences their identities. Ultimately, the spatial analysis of fellow townsmen associations demonstrates that the associations are not merely a physical structure; they are also an emotional labour, the implementation of which, objects, and interactions play a crucial role.

Özet

Bu makale, Türkiye’deki iç göçmen grupları için hemşehri derneklerinin nasıl anlamlı bir mekâna, bir eve, dönüşmesini ve algılanmasını incelemektedir. Mevcut literatür, genellikle hemşehri derneklerinin işlevleri, ulusötesi ve yerel ötesi etkileşimleri ile bunlara katkıları üzerineyoğunlaşırken, mekânsal faktörlerin bu süreçteki rolü genellikle göz ardı edilmiştir. Bu çalışma, 2013-2018 yılları arasında yürütülen etnografik bir araştırmanın ve mevcut 'ev' çalışmaları literatürünü kullanarak, göçmenlerin hemşehri derneklerinde ‘ev' duygusunu nasıl inşa ettikleriğini, özellikle yüz yüze etkileşimler, nesneler ve uygulamalar üzerinden incelemektedir. Araştırma, hemeşehri derneklerinin bir 'ev mekânına dönüşmesinin dernek liderlerinin eylemleri ve göçmenlerin gündelik yaşamlarında kullandıkları nesneler aracılığıyla gerçekleştiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu süreç, göçmenler arasında aşinalık ve güven duygusu yaratmada kritik bir rol oynamaktadır. Makale ayrıca, göçmenlerin kimliklerinin şekillendiği bu aidiyet duygusuna dönüştüğünü vurgulamaktadır. Sonuç olarak, hemşehri derneklerinin mekansal olarak incelenmesi, derneklerin yalnızca fiziksel bir yapıdan ibaret olmadığını, aynı zamanda duygusal bir emeğin, uygulanmasını, nesnelerin ve etkileşimlerin önemli bir rol oynadığını ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yılmaz, H. A. (2024). “A Home Away from Home”: The Case of the Yurt Homeland Association in Gebze. İDEALKENT, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 46, 2711–2732. https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.1547072

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (45)

  1. Ahmed, S., Casteneda, C., Fortier, A.-M., & Sheller, M. (Eds.). (2003). Uprootings/regroundings: Questions of home and migration. Berg.
  2. Aksoy, E. (2016). 1919-1955 yılları arasında Türkiye’nin nüfus yapısı ve uygulanan nüfus politikaları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 24, 27–44.
  3. Allen, S. (2008). Finding home: Challenges faced by geographically mobile families. Family Relations, 57(1), 84-99.
  4. Ambrosini, M. (2014). Migration and transnational commitment: some evidence from the Italian case. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(4), 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.830883.
  5. Antonsich, M. (2010). Searching for belonging—an analytical framework. Georaphy Compass, 4(6), 644-659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009. 00317.x
  6. Blunt, A., & Dowling, R. M. (2006). Home, Routledge.
  7. Boccagni, P., & Pilati, K. (2015). One (slender) tree, many (social) roots: Revisiting immigrant associations through a case study on Ecuadorians in Italy. Journal of Civil Society, 11(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689. 2015.1019180
  8. Boym, S. (1998). On diasporic intimacy: Ilya Kabakov’s installations and immigrant homes. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 498–524.
  9. Brah, A. (1996). Cartographies of diaspora: contesting identities. Routledge.
  10. Braun, V., & Clarke, C. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/ 1478088706qp063oa
  11. Brickell, D., & Datta, A. (Eds.). (2011). Translocal geographies: Spaces, places, connections. Ashgate.
  12. Brickell, K. (2011). Translocal geographies of in Siem Reap, Cambodia. In K. Brickell & A. Datta (Eds.), Translocal Geographies: Spaces, places, connections (pp. 23–39). Ashgate.
  13. Datta, A. (2008). Building differences: Material geographies of home(s) among Polish builders in London. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(4), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008. 00320.x
  14. Davies, C. A. (2008). Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  15. Digby, S. (2006). The casket of magic: Home and identity from salvaged objects. Home Cultures, 3(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.2752/174063106778053219
  16. Fortier, A.-M. (2006). Community, belonging and intimate ethnicity. Modern Italy, 11(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13532940500492308
  17. Gedik, E. (2011). Migrant organizations in Turkey and Germany: Local, transnational and global contexts of Kurdish-Alevis from Varto, Turkey. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development, 40(1/2), 151–204.
  18. Greiner, C., & Sakdapolrak, P. (2013). Translocality: Concepts, applications and emerging research perspectives. Geography Compass, 7(5), 373–384. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12048
  19. Guarnizo, L. E., Portes, A., & Haller, W. (2003). Assimilation and transnationalism: Determinants of transnational political action among contemporary migrants. American Journal of Sociology, 108(6), 1211–1248. https://doi.org/10.1086/375195
  20. Hage, G. (1997). At home in the entrails of the west: Multiculturalism, ethnic food and migrant home-building. In H. Grace, G. Hage, L. Johnson, J. Langsworth & M. Symonds (Eds.), Home/world: Space, community and marginality in Sydney's west (pp. 99–153). Pluto Press.
  21. Hedberg, C., & Carmo, R. M. do C. (2012). Translocal ruralism: Mobility and connectivity in European rural spaces. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2315-3
  22. Hersant, J. and Toumarkine, A. (2005). Hometown organisations in Turkey: An overview. European Journal of Turkish Studies, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.4000/ ejts.397
  23. Kabachnik, P., Regulska, J., & Mitchneck, B. (2010). Where and when is home? The double displacement of Georgian IDPs from Abkhazia. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feq023
  24. Kıray, M. (2002). Hayatımda hiç arkama bakmadım. Bağlam Yayınları.
  25. Kochan, D. (2016). Home is where I lay down my hat? The complexities and functions of home for internal migrants in contemporary China. Geoforum, 71, 21–32. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.02.021
  26. Küçükcan, T. (1999). Politics of ethnicity, identity, and religion: Turkish Muslims in Britain. Ashgate.
  27. Kurtoğlu, A. (2005). Mekansal bir olgu olarak hemşehrilik ve bir hemşehrilik mekanı olarak dernekler. European Journal of Turkish Studies, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejts.375
  28. Lamba-Nieves, D. (2018). Hometown associations and the micropolitics of transnational community development. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(5), 754–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1366850
  29. Mallett, S. (2004). Understanding home: a critical review of the literature. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 62-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.2004. 00442.x
  30. Mazzucato, V., & Kabki, M. (2009). Small is beautiful: The micro-politics of transnational relationships between Ghanaian hometown associations and communities back home. Global Networks, 9(2), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00252.x
  31. Portes, A. and Landolt, P. (2000). Social capital: Promise and pitfalls of its role in development. Journal of Latin American Studies, 32(2), 529-547. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022216x00005836.
  32. Rapport, N. J., & Dawson, A. (1998). Migrants of identity: Perceptions of home in a world of movement. Berg.
  33. Rose, G. (2003). Family photographs and domestic spacings: A case study. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28(1), 5–18.
  34. Smith, M. (2011). Translocality: A critical reflection. In K. Brickell & A. Datta (Eds.), Translocal geographies: Spaces, places, connections (pp. 181–199). Ashgate.
  35. T.C. İçişleri Bakanlığı Sivil Toplumla İlişkiler Genel Müdürlüğü. (2024). Hemşehri derneklerinin bölgelere göre dağılım. Sivil toplum. https:// www.siviltoplum.gov.tr/dernek-sayilari
  36. Tezcan, T. (2011).Gebze: Küçük Türkiye'nin göç serüveni. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  37. Tolia-Kelly, D. (2004). Materializing postcolonial geographies: Examining the textural landscapes of migration in the South Asian home. Geoforum, 35(6), 675–688.
  38. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2022, July 24). International migration statistics, https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=International-Migration-Statistics-2022-49457&dil=2
  39. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2024, Feburary 6). The results of address based population registration system, https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index? p=The-Results-of-Address-Based-Population-Registration-System-2023-49684&dil=2
  40. Tweed, T. A. (2006). Crossing and dwelling: A theory of religion. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674044517
  41. Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty first century. Routledge.
  42. Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Polity Press.
  43. Wise, A. (2011). You would not know what’s in there would you? Homeliness and “foreign” signs in Ashfield. In K. Brickell & A. Datta (Eds.), Translocal Geographies Spaces, Places, Connections (pp. 93–109). Ashgate.
  44. Yavuz, M. H. (2003). Islamic political identity in Turkey. Oxford University Press.
  45. Yavuz, S. (2016). Internal migration of Turkey’s older population. In D. Eroğlu, J. H. Cohen, & İ. Sirkeci (Eds.), Turkish Migration 2016: Selected Papers (pp. 290–297). Transnational Press.