AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightAs a result of the analyses, career planning was affected by the service quality of career centers (B=.649; p<.001; 95% CI [.562; .736]) and university choice (B=.682; p<.001; 95% CI [. 584; .780]), and career center service quality was a partial mediator in the relationship between individual career planning and university choice (β = .320, p<.001; 95% CI [.239; . 467]).
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the mediating role of career center service quality in the effect of individual career planing on university preferences. The research was conducted on 307 students studying at a foundation university. In the process of testing the research hypotheses, Process Macro application was used via SPSS and model 4 parameters were applied. As a result of the analyses, career planning was affected by the service quality of career centers (B=.649; p<.001; 95% CI [.562; .736]) and university choice (B=.682; p<.001; 95% CI [. 584; .780]), and career center service quality was a partial mediator in the relationship between individual career planning and university choice (β = .320, p<.001; 95% CI [.239; . 467]).
Özet
Bu araştırmanın amacı bireysel kariyer planlamanın üniversite tercihine etkisinde kariyer merkezi hizmet kalitesinin aracılık rolünün incelenmesidir. Araştırma bir vakıf üniversitesinde öğrenim gören 307 öğrenci üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma hipotezlerinin test edilmesinde SPSS aracılığı ile Process Makro uygulamasından faydalanılmış ve model 4 parametreleri uygulanmıştır. Gerçekleştirilen analizler neticesinde bireysel kariyer planlamanın kariyer merkezlerinin hizmet kalitesi (B=.649; p<.001; 95% CI [.562; .736]) ve üniversite tercihi (B=.682; p<.001; 95% CI [.584; .780]) üzerinde pozitif etkiye sahip olduğu, kariyer merkezi hizmet kalitesinin ise bireysel kariyer planlama ve üniversite tercihi arasındaki ilişkide kısmi aracı (β = .320, p<.001; 95% CI [.239; .467]) rol sergilediği tespit edilmiştir.