SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS AND USE OF 0-1 GOAL PROGRAMMING METHODS IN SELECTING SUPPLIER FIRM

Tedarikçi Firma Seçiminde Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi Ve 0-1 Hedef Programlama Yöntemlerinin Kullanılması

Metin Dağdeviren
Tamer Eren
Pages
41–52
Publication Date
2013-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Using the two methods together is also discussed in this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Organizations have to work with a lot of supplier firms in order to continue their activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, Analytical hierarchy process and general structure of 0-1 goal programming techniques are presented and an application to select supplier is performed using the two methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Using the two methods together is also discussed in this study.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Analitik hiyerarşi prosesi · 0-1 hedef programlama · tedarikçi seçimi

Abstract

Organizations have to work with a lot of supplier firms in order to continue their activities. Selecting the supplier firms from a group of candidates is a difficult decision making problem. In this study, Analytical hierarchy process and general structure of 0-1 goal programming techniques are presented and an application to select supplier is performed using the two methods. Using the two methods together is also discussed in this study.

Özet

Organizasyonlar, faaliyetlerini sürdürebilmek için birçok tedarikçi firmayla çalışmak zorundadırlar. Tedarikçi firmaların bir grup adayın içinden seçilmesi zor bir karar problemidir. Bu çalışmada Analitik hiyerarşi prosesi ve 0-1 Hedef Programlama tekniklerinin genel yapısı anlatılmış ve her iki yöntemin kullanılmasıyla tedarikçi seçimine yönelik bir uygulama yapılmıştır. Bu metotların bir arada kullanılmasının etkinliği de tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dağdeviren, M., Eren, T. (2013). ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS AND USE OF 0-1 GOAL PROGRAMMING METHODS IN SELECTING SUPPLIER FIRM. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 41–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/1079229

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (77)

  1. Montgomery, D.C., Johnson, L.A., Forecasting and Time Series Analysis,
  2. McGraw-Hill, USA, 1976.
  3. Kutay, F., Zaman Serilerinde Tahmin Teknikleri ve Box-Jenkins Modelleri,
  4. Ders Notları, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara, 1989.
  5. Dizdar, E.N., Üretim Sistemlerinde Olası İş Kazaları İçin Bir Erken Uyarı
  6. Modeli, Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 1998.
  7. Vargas L.G., “An Overview of The AHP and Its Application”, European
  8. Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 48, No: 1, pp. 2-8, 1990.
  9. Zahedi, F., “A Utility Approach to The AHP”, Mathematical Modelling, Vol., No: 3-5, pp. 387-395, 1987.
  10. Dickson, G.W., “An Analysis of Vendor Selection Systems and Decisions”,
  11. Journal of Purchasing, Vol 2, pp. 5-17, 1966.
  12. Arbel, A., Seidmann A., “An Application of The AHP to Bank Strategic
  13. Planning: the Mergers and Acquisitions Process”, European Journal of
  14. Operational Research, Vol 27, pp. 27-37, 1990.
  15. Arbel, A., Seidmann A., “Capacity Planning, Benchmarking and Evaluation of
  16. Small Computer Systems”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol., pp. 347-358, 1985.
  17. Arbel, A., Seidmann A., “Selecting a Microcomputer For Process Control and
  18. Data Acquisition”, IIE Transactions, Vol. 16, No: 1, pp. 73-80, 1984.
  19. Beck M.P., Lin B.W., “Selection of Automated Office Systems: a Case Study”,
  20. OMEGA, Vol 9, No: 2, 169-176, 1981.
  21. Tam M.C.Y., Tummala V.M.R., “An Application of The AHP in Vendor
  22. Selection of a Telecommunications System”, OMEGA, Vol. 29, No: 2, pp 171-, 2001.
  23. Ghodsypour, S.H., Brien, C.O., “A Decision Support System for Supplier
  24. Selection Using an Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Linear
  25. Programming”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 56-57,
  26. pp. 199-212, 1998.
  27. Zviran, M.A., “Comprehensive Methodology for Computer Family Selection”,
  28. Journal Systems Software, Vol 22, pp. 17-26, 1993.
  29. Bard, J.F., “Evaluating Space Station Applications of Automation and
  30. Robotics”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 33, No: 2,
  31. 110, 1986.
  32. Yurdakul, M., İç Y.T., “AHP ve Hedef Programlama Yöntemlerinin Sağlayıcı
  33. Seçimi Probleminde Kullanılması”, XXII. Ulusal YA/EM Kongresi, Gazi
  34. Üniversitesi, Ankara, 2001.
  35. Narasimahn R., “An Analytical Approach to Supplier Selection” Journal of
  36. Purchasing and Management, Vol. 19, No 4, 27-32, 1983.
  37. Nydick R.L., Hill R.P., “Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Structure the
  38. Supplier Selection Procedure”, Journal of Purchasing and Management, Vol., No: 2, pp. 31-36, 1992.
  39. Partovi F.Y., Burton J., Banerjee A. “Application of Analytic Hierarchy
  40. Process in Operations Management”, International Journal of Operations
  41. and Production Management, Vol. 10, No: 3, pp. 5-19, 1989.
  42. Yurdakul, M., İç Y.T., “Üretim Firmalarının Kredibilitesinin Belirlenmesinde
  43. Analitik Hiyerarşi Yönteminin Kullanılması”, Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri
  44. Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 13, No: 4, pp. 1007-1023, 2000
  45. Saaty T.L., The Analytic Hierarcy Process, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  46. Jones D. F., Mirrazavi S. K., and Tamiz M., “Multi-Objective Meta-Heuristics:
  47. An Overview of The Current State-of-The-Art”, European Journal of
  48. Operational Research, Vol. 137, No: 1, pp. 1-9, 2002.
  49. Aouni B., Kettani O., “Goal Programming Model: A Glorious History and A
  50. Promising Future”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 133, No, pp. 225-231, 2001.
  51. Uría M. V. R., Caballero R., Ruiz F, and Romero C., ”Meta-Goal
  52. Programming”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 136, No 2,
  53. pp. 422-429, 2002.
  54. Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Ferguson R., “Optimal Estimation of Executive
  55. Compensation by Linear Programming”, Management Science Vol. 1, pp. 138-, 1955.
  56. Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Management Models and Industrial
  57. Applications of Linear Programming, Wiley, New York, 1961.
  58. Ignizio J. P., Goal Programming and Extensions, Lexington Mass: Heath,
  59. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1976.
  60. Lee S. M., Goal Programming for Decision Analysis, Auerbach, Philadelphia,
  61. Romero C., Handbook of Critical Issues in Goal Programming, Pergamon
  62. Press, Oxford, 1991.
  63. Romero C., “A Survey of Generalised Goal Programming” European Journal
  64. of Operational Research, Vol. 25, pp. 183-191, 1986.
  65. Schniederjans M. J., The Life Cycle of Goal Programming Research as
  66. Recorded in Journal Articles”, Operations Research, Vol. 43, pp. 551-557,
  67. Tamiz M, Jones D F., El-Darzi, “A Review of Goal Programming and Its
  68. Applications”, Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 58, pp. 39-53, 1993.
  69. Tamiz M., Jones D., and Romero C., “Goal Programming For Decision Making:
  70. Operational Research, Vol. 111, No: 3, pp. 569-581, 1998.
  71. Badri, M.A., “Combining The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Goal
  72. Programming for Global Facility Location-AllocationPproblem”, International
  73. Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 62, pp. 237-248, 1999.
  74. Schniederjans M.J., and Garvin T., “Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and
  75. Multi-Objective Programming for The Selection of Cost Drivers in Activity-
  76. Based Costing”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 100, No:, pp. 72-80, 1997.
  77. Expert Choice, Mclean, VA: Decision Support Software, 1986.