Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2

EFFECTS OF PROCESS PARAMETERS ON THE STRUCTURE AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE PARTS PRODUCED BY COUNTER GRAVITY CASTING PROCESS

ÜRETİM ŞARTLARININ YERÇEKİMİNE TERS DÖKÜM YÖNTEMİYLE ÜRETİLEN PARÇALARIN YAPI VE MEKANİK ÖZELLİKLERİNE ETKİLERİ

Pages
257–264
Publication Date
2013-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that improved mechanical properties were obtained by counter gravity casting process

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effects of pouring temperature and pressure on structure and mechanical properties of Al - 10% Si alloys produced by green sand mold traditional gravity casting and counter gravity casting methods were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The specimens were poured at 600, 640 and 690°C temperature under 100, 200, 250, 300 and 500 mmHg vacuum level.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that improved mechanical properties were obtained by counter gravity casting process
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yerçekimine ters döküm · yaş kum kalıp · mekanik özellikler.

Abstract

In this study, the effects of pouring temperature and pressure on structure and mechanical properties of Al - 10% Si alloys produced by green sand mold traditional gravity casting and counter gravity casting methods were investigated. The specimens were poured at 600, 640 and 690°C temperature under 100, 200, 250, 300 and 500 mmHg vacuum level. The results showed that improved mechanical properties were obtained by counter gravity casting process

Özet

Bu çalışmada, döküm sıcaklığı ve basıncının yaş kum kalıplar kullanılarak geleneksel yerçekimi (gravity casting) ve yerçekimine ters döküm (counter gravity casting) yöntemleri ile üretilen Al-% 10 Si alaşımının yapı ve mekanik özelliklerine etkileri araştırılmıştır. Alaşıma ait numuneler 600, 640 ve 690°C sıcaklıklarda 100, 200, 250, 300 ve 500 mmHg vakum seviyelerinde dökülmüştür. Elde edilen sonuçlar, yerçekimine ters döküm yöntemiyle üretilen parçaların geleneksel döküm yöntemiyle üretilen parçalarda daha üstün mekanik özelliklere sahip olduklarını göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Hasırcı, H., Gül, F. (2013). EFFECTS OF PROCESS PARAMETERS ON THE STRUCTURE AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE PARTS PRODUCED BY COUNTER GRAVITY CASTING PROCESS. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 257–264. https://ajindex.com/articles/1078978

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (52)

  1. G.D.Chandley, “Use of Vacuum for Counter
  2. Gravity Casting of Metals” Materials Res.
  3. Innovant, pp: 14-23, 1999.
  4. F.Ripkin and S.Lipson, “Counter Gravity
  5. Casting of Aluminum Alloys in Green Sand
  6. Molds” AFS Transactions, 67-70, pp: 581-592,
  7. Anon, “Turning the Gating World Upside
  8. Down”, Technical Paper, Hitchiner
  9. Manufacturing Co., (www.hitchiner.com)
  10. G.D.Chandley, “Counter Gravity Casting of
  11. Aluminum in Investment and Sand Molds”, AFS
  12. Transactions, 86-39, pp: 209-214, 1986.
  13. S.Lipson and F.Ripkin, “Effect of Sections
  14. Thickness on the Tensile Properties of Thin-
  15. Section Aluminum Alloy Sand Casting” AFS
  16. Transactions, 69, pp: 192-197, 1969.
  17. G.D.Chandley and M.C.Flemings, “Gating
  18. Premium Quality Casting” AFS Transactions,
  19. 37, pp: 121-128, 1988.
  20. M.C.Flemings, H.F.Conrad and H.F.Taylor,
  21. “Aluminum Alloys Fluidity Test” AFS
  22. Transactions, 93-59, pp: 496-507, 1993.
  23. I.H.Katzarov and others, “Porosity Formation in
  24. axi-symetric castings produced by countergravity
  25. casting method” International Journal
  26. of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol: 44, pp: 111-, 2001.
  27. D.M.Stefanescu and others, “In Situ Research
  28. Utilization for Processing of Metals Alloys on
  29. Lunar and Mars Bases”, (www.
  30. Science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/
  31. space98pdf/insitu.pdf) 2003.
  32. G.D.Chandley, “Making casting without ladles
  33. or sprues – the CLA process” AFS
  34. Transactions, 76-28, pp: 37-42, 1976.
  35. Anon, Molding Methods and Materials,
  36. American Foundryman’s Society
  37. publications, Illinois, USA, pp: 120-300, 1962.
  38. E.S. Kim, K.H. Lee and Y.H. Moon, “A
  39. feasibility study of the partial squeeze and
  40. vacuum die casting process”, Journal of
  41. Materials Processing Technology 105, p: 42-, 2000.
  42. X.P. Niu, B.H. Hu, I. Pinwill and H. Li,
  43. “Vacuum assisted high pressure die casting of
  44. aluminium alloys”, Journal of Materials
  45. Processing Technology 105, p: 119-127, 2000.
  46. Anson, J.P., Stucky, M. and Druzleski, J.E.,
  47. “Effect of Sr modification on nucleation and
  48. growth of microporosity during the solidification
  49. of Al-7%Si foundry alloy”, AFS Transactions,
  50. 70, p: 419-426, 2000.
  51. Campbell, J. “Casting” Butterworth-
  52. Heinemann, 120-300, 1999.