SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Beykoz Akademi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

THE KEENNESS OF CELLULAR PHONE BRANDS TO VALUE CO-CREATION WITH THEIR CUSTOMERS: A STUDY ON THE PERCEPTIONS OF ISTANBUL CONSUMERS

CEP TELEFONU MARKALARININ MÜŞTERİLERİ İLE BİRLİKTE DEĞER YARATMA HEVESLİLİKLERİ: İSTANBULDAKİ TÜKETİCİLERİN ALGILARI ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Ezgi Uzel AYDINOCAK
Pages
75–92
Publication Date
2015-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the study show that all dimensions are classified under the same factors as the original scale, and the scale has a high rate of reliability

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With the emergence of service dominant logic in the services marketing literature, it is recognized that value creation is not only a one-sided responsibility of the firm toward the customer, but it is actually a process created mutually with the customer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The efforts of firms have increased in recent years in creating value with the customer, however there is still a lack of research regarding value co-creation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the study show that all dimensions are classified under the same factors as the original scale, and the scale has a high rate of reliability
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Değer yaratma · birlikte değer yaratma · hizmet pazarlaması

Abstract

With the emergence of service dominant logic in the services marketing literature, it is recognized that value creation is not only a one-sided responsibility of the firm toward the customer, but it is actually a process created mutually with the customer. The efforts of firms have increased in recent years in creating value with the customer, however there is still a lack of research regarding value co-creation. For example, there is still a few scale for measuring value co-creation in the literature. DART scale is one of the scales that is developed for measuring the readiness of firms for value co-creation, and designed with four dimensions which are dialog, access, risk assessment and transparency. This study aims to apply the DART scale on mobile phone users who live in the city of Istanbul in order to measure the perceptions of them toward the readiness of cell phone brands for value co-creation. The results of the study show that all dimensions are classified under the same factors as the original scale, and the scale has a high rate of reliability

Özet

Hizmet baskın mantık döneminin ilerlemesiyle değer yaratmanın sadece işletmenin müşteriye karşı tek taraflı bir sorumluluğu olmadığı, aksine müşterilerle karşılıklı bir etkileşim sonucu ortaya çıkan bir süreç olduğu ortaya konmuştur. İşletmelerin müşterileri ile birlikte değer yaratma çabaları son yıllarda artış göstermiş olmasına rağmen tam anlamıyla izlenecek yol hakkında yeterli araştırma bulunmamaktadır. Birlikte değer yaratma kavramını hizmet yazınında ölçen az sayıda ölçek bulunmaktadır. Bunların içerisinde en son geliştirilen DART ölçeğidir ve işletmelerin müşterileri ile birlikte değer yaratma hevesliliklerini toplam dört boyutta – diyalog, erişim, risk değerlendirmesi ve şeffaflık- ölçmek üzere tasarlanmıştır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, İstanbul ilinde cep telefonu kullanan tüketiciler üzerinde, cep telefonu markalarının birlikte değer yaratma heveslilikleri konusunda algılarını ölçmek adına DART ölçeğinin uygulanmasıdır. Araştırmanın sonucunda ölçek, aslında olduğu gibi boyutlarını korumuş ve güvenilirliği yüksek bulunmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDINOCAK, E. U. (2015). THE KEENNESS OF CELLULAR PHONE BRANDS TO VALUE CO-CREATION WITH THEIR CUSTOMERS: A STUDY ON THE PERCEPTIONS OF ISTANBUL CONSUMERS. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 75–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/106382

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ballantyne, David ve Richard J. Varey, (2006) “Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: the exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing” Marketing Theory, 6(3), s.335-348.
  2. Barnes, William J. G. (2003) “Establishing meaningful customer relationships: why some companies and brands mean more to their customers” Managing Service Quality, 13(3), s.178-186.
  3. Baron, Steve ve Kim Harris (2008) “Consumers as Resource Integrators” Journal of Marketing Management, 24 (1-2), s.113-130.
  4. Carş, Antonella ve Bernard Cova (2003) “Revisiting consumption experience: a more humble but complete view of the concept” Marketing Theory, 3(2), s.267-286.
  5. Chan, Kimmy Wa, Chi Kin Yim ve Simon S. K. Lam (2010) “Is Customer Participation in Value Creation a Double-Edged Sword? Evidence from Professional Financial Services across Cultures” Journal of Marketing, 74 (3), s.48-64.
  6. Cova, Bernard ve Dalli, Daniele (2009) “Working Consumers: The Next Step in Marketing Theory?” Marketing Theory, 9(3), s.315- 339. Echeverri, Per ve Skålen Per (2011) “Co-creation and co-destruction-a practice theory based study of interactive value formation” Marketing Theory, 11(3), s.351-373.
  7. Füller, Johann (2010) “Refining Virtual Co-Creation from a Consumer Perspective” California Management Review, 52(2): s.98-122.
  8. Grönroos, Christian (2008) “Service logic revisited: who creates value? And who co- creates?” European Business Review, 20(4), s.298-314.
  9. Grönroos, Christian ve Ravald, A. (2011) “Service business logic: implications for value creation and marketing” Journal of Service Management, 22(1), s.5-22.
  10. Grönroos, Christian (2011) “Value Co-Creation in Service Logic. A Critical Analysis” Marketing Theory, 11(3). Grönroos, Christian ve Päivi Voima (2013) “Critical Service Logic: Making Sense of Value Creation and Co-creation” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41, s.133-50.
  11. Gummesson, Evert (2008) “Extending the New Dominant Logic: From Customer Centricity to Balanced Centricity” Commentary for Special Issue of The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science JAMS, 36(1), s.15-17.
  12. Heinonen, Kristina ve Tore Strandvik (2009) “Monitoring value-in-use of e-service” Journal of Service Management, 20(1), s.33-51.
  13. Helkkula, Anu ve Carol Kelleher (2010) “Circularity of customer service experience and customer perceived value” Journal of Customer Behaviour, 9(1), s.37-53.
  14. Kristensson Per, Jonas Matthing ve Johansson Niklas (2008) “Key Strategies for the Successful Involvement of Custo