Journals / Birey ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

-

İslam’ı İncelemekten Müslümanları İncelemeye: Bir İslam Antropolojisine Doğru

Pages
193–222
Publication Date
2014-06-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Yet many events have changed the relationship between the Muslim and non-Muslim world since Geertz wrote his seminal book Islam Observed, and Asad reopened the debate on the idea of an anthropology of Islam which el-Zein had started.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:From Studying Islam to Studying Muslims: Towards the Anthropology of Islam- : In this paper we have observed the debate stemming from the question ‘what is the anthropology of Islam?
📊
Key Findings & Data:We still cannot define (and probably do not need to do so) what the anthropology of Islam may be (or even should be), we can surely affirm what is not.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Yet many events have changed the relationship between the Muslim and non-Muslim world since Geertz wrote his seminal book Islam Observed, and Asad reopened the debate on the idea of an anthropology of Islam which el-Zein had started.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İslam · Antropoloji · İslam antropolojisi

Abstract

From Studying Islam to Studying Muslims: Towards the Anthropology of Islam- : In this paper we have observed the debate stemming from the question ‘what is the anthropology of Islam? We still cannot define (and probably do not need to do so) what the anthropology of Islam may be (or even should be), we can surely affirm what is not. The anthropology of Islam is not theology. This means going beyond the question of Islam or Islams, and observing the dynamics of Muslim lives expressed through their ideological and rhetorical understanding of their surrounding environment. Yet many events have changed the relationship between the Muslim and non-Muslim world since Geertz wrote his seminal book Islam Observed, and Asad reopened the debate on the idea of an anthropology of Islam which el-Zein had started.

Özet

Bu yazıda “İslam antropolojisi nedir” sorusu üzerinde odaklanan tartışmalar ele alınmaktadır. İslam antropolojisinin ne olabileceğini, hatta ne olması gerektiğini tanımlayamıyorsak da (aslında buna gerek de yok) kesinlikle onun ne olmadığını söyleyebiliriz. İslam antropolojisi teoloji değildir. Bu İslam ya da İslamlar nedir sorusunun ötesine geçmek, Müslümanların çevrelerini kendi ideolojik ve retorik anlayışıyla ifade ettikleri dinamikleri incelemek demektir. Ama Geertz’in çığır açan kitabı Islam Observed’ı yazdığından ve Asad, El-Zein’ın İslam antropolojisi fikri üzerine açtığı tartışmayı tekrar başlattığından beri, birçok olay Müslüman olan ve olmayan dünya arasındaki ilişkiyi değiştirmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Marrancı, G. (2014). -. Birey ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 193–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/1061414

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (81)

  1. Abu-Lughod, L. (1986), Veiled Sentiments: Honor and Poetry in a Bedouin Society,
  2. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  3. Abu-Lughod, L. (1989), ‘Zones of Theory in the Anthropology of the Arab
  4. World’, Annual Review of Anthropology 8: 267–306.
  5. Ahmed, A. S. (1986), Toward Islamic Anthropology: Definition, Dogma and
  6. Directions, Herndon, VA: International Institute of Islamic thought.
  7. Ahmed, A. S. (1988), Discovering Islam: Making Sense of Muslim History and
  8. Society, London: Routledge.
  9. Asad, T. (1986b), The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam, Washington DC: Centre
  10. for Contemporary Arab Studies.
  11. Ba-Yunus, L. and Ahmad, F. (1985), Islamic Sociology: an Introduction, Cambridge:
  12. The Islamic Academy.
  13. Becker, J. (1993), Gamelan Stories: Tantrism, Islam, and Aesthetics in Central
  14. Java, Tempe: Arizona State University.
  15. Bujra, A. S. (1971), The Politics of Stratification: A Study of Political Change in
  16. a South Arabian Town, Oxford: Clarendon.
  17. Crapanzano, V. (1973), The Hamadsha: A Study in Moroccan Ethnopsychiatry,
  18. Daniel, N. (1993), Islam and the West: The Making of an Image, Edinburgh:
  19. Edinburgh University Press.
  20. Durkheim, E. (1915), The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, London: George
  21. Allen & Unwin.
  22. Eickelman, D. F. (1981b), ‘A Search for the Anthropology of Islam: Abdul Hamid
  23. El-Zein’, International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 13: 361–5.
  24. el-Zein, A. H. (1977), ‘Beyond Ideology and Theology: the Search for the Anthropology
  25. of Islam’, Annual Review of Anthropology 6: 227–54.
  26. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1940), The Nuer, Oxford: Calarendon Press.
  27. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1949), The Sanusi of Cyrenaica, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  28. Fernea, R. and Malarkey, J. M. (1975), ‘Anthropology of the Middle East and
  29. Northern Africa: A Critical Assessment’, Annual Review of Anthropology 4:
  30. Flaubert, G. (1972), Flaubert in Egypt: A Sensibility on Tour, Boston: Little
  31. Brown.
  32. Geertz, C. (1968), Islam Observed, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  33. Geertz, C. (1988), Works and Lives: the Anthropologist As Author, Stanford:
  34. Stanford University Press.
  35. Gellner, E. (1981), Muslim Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  36. Gilsenan, M. (1973), Saint and Sufi in Modern Egypt: An Essay in the Sociology
  37. of Religion, Oxford: Clarendon.
  38. Gilsenan, M. (1982), Recognizing Islam: Religion and Society in the Modern
  39. Middle East, London: I. B. Tauris.
  40. Gilsenan, M. (1990), ‘Very Like a Camel: The Appearance of an Anthropologist’s
  41. Middle East’, in R. Fardon (ed.), Localizing Strategies: Regional Traditions of
  42. Ethnographic Writing, Edinburgh and Washington: Scottish Academic Press,
  43. Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 222–39.
  44. Goldziher, I. (1971), Muslim Studies, London: George Allen & Unwin.
  45. Hammoudi, A. (1980), ‘Segmentary, Social Stratification, Political Power and
  46. Sainthood: Reflections on Gellner’s Theses’, Economy and Society 9: 279–303.
  47. Hefner, R. (1987), ‘The Political Economy of Islamic Conversion in Modern East
  48. Java’, in W. R. Roff (ed.), Islam and the Political Economy of Meaning, London:
  49. Croom Helm, pp. 53–78.
  50. Kritzeck, J. (1964), Peter the Venerable and Islam, Princeton NJ: Princeton University
  51. Press.
  52. Kunin, S. (2002), Religion: Modern Theories, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University
  53. Lukens-Bull, R. A. (1996), ‘Metaphorical Aspects of Indonesian Islamic Discourse
  54. about Development’, in R. A. Lukens-Bull (ed.), Intellectual Development in
  55. Indonesian Islam, Tempe: Arizona State University, Chapter 8.
  56. Lukens-Bull, R. A. (1999), ‘Between Texts and Practice: Considerations in the Anthropology of Islam’, Marburg Journal of Religion 4(2): 1–10
  57. Lukens-Bull, R. A. (2005), A Peaceful Jihad, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  58. Mahroof, M. (1981), ‘Elements for an Islamic Anthropology’, in Social and Natural
  59. Sciences: the Islamic perspective, Jaddah: KAA University & Hodder &
  60. Stoughton, pp. 15–23.
  61. Malinowski, B. (1922/1978), Argonauts of the Western Pacific, London: Routledge
  62. and Kegan Paul.
  63. Mernissi, F. (1975), Beyond the Veil: Male–Female Dynamics in a Modern Muslim
  64. Society, New York: Schenkman Publishing Company.
  65. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1922), The Andaman Islanders: a Study in Social Anthropology,
  66. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
  67. Redfield, R. (1956), Peasant Society and Culture, Chicago: Chicago University
  68. Robinson, N. (2002), ‘The Fascination of Islam’, Islam and Christian-Muslim
  69. Relations 13(1): 97–110.
  70. Said, E. (1978), Orientalism, New York: Pantheon Books.
  71. Shankland, D. (2003), The Alevis in Turkey, London and New York: Routledge Curzon.
  72. Tapper, R. (1988), ‘Review of Ahmed 1986’, Man, 23(3): 567–8.
  73. Tylor, E. (1881), Anthropology: An Introduction to the Study of Man and Civilization, London: Macmillan.
  74. Varisco, M. D. (2005), Islam Obscured: The Rhetoric of Anthropological Representation,
  75. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  76. Weber, M. (1920/1958), The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, New
  77. York: Scribner’s.
  78. Woodward, M. (1989), Islam in Java: Normative Piety and Mysticism in the
  79. Sultanate of Yogyakarta, Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  80. Wyn, M. D. (1988), Knowing One Another: Shaping Islamic Anthropology, London
  81. and New York: Mansell