SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

HOW AND WHY WE NEED TO TEACH STANDARDERROR: TEACHING STANDARD ERROR AS A PRIMER ON THE SAMPLING DISTRIBUTION WITH A NEW MOBILE APPLICATION

Namık TOP
Mehmet ÖREN
Pages
0–0
Publication Date
2016-06-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper also offers a new mobile application to teach understandably the influences of various parameters and statistics on sampling distribution and standard error.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Null hypothesis statistical significance testing (NHST) is a vital, frequently utilized, but contentious topic in the field of statistics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Applying statistics to a problem, it is necessary to comprehend NHST and the sampling distribution.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper also offers a new mobile application to teach understandably the influences of various parameters and statistics on sampling distribution and standard error.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Null hypothesis statistical significance testing (NHST) is a vital, frequently utilized, but contentious topic in the field of statistics. Applying statistics to a problem, it is necessary to comprehend NHST and the sampling distribution. Another crucial topic, which is related to NHST and the sampling distribution, is the standard error­­, a standard deviation-form function obtained from the sampling distribution. This paper provides an outline of these important concepts to help students understand and ponder these concepts logically. This paper also offers a new mobile application to teach understandably the influences of various parameters and statistics on sampling distribution and standard error.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOP, N., ÖREN, M. (2016). HOW AND WHY WE NEED TO TEACH STANDARDERROR: TEACHING STANDARD ERROR AS A PRIMER ON THE SAMPLING DISTRIBUTION WITH A NEW MOBILE APPLICATION. Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 0–0. https://ajindex.com/articles/102790

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. REFERENCES BAKAN, D. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423-37.
  2. CARVER, R. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378-399.
  3. COHEN. J. (1965). Some statistical issues in psychological research. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.). Handbook of clinical psychology (pp. 95-121). New York: McGraw-Hill. CORTINA, J. M., & Landis, R. S. 2011. The Earth is not round (p =.00). Organizational Research Methods, 14, 332-349.
  4. DUHACKEK, A., & IACOBUCCI, D. (2004). Alpha's standard error (ASE): An accurate and precise confidence interval estimate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 792-808.
  5. FIELD A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage. FISHER, R. A. (1935). The design of experiments. New York: Hafner. JOSEPH, L., & REINHOLD, C. (2003). Introduction to probability theory and sampling distributions. American Journal of Roentgenology, 180, 917-923.
  6. KIRK, R.E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746-759.
  7. LOFTUS, G. R., & Loftus, E. F. (1982).
  8. Essence of statistics. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. MEEHL, P.E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806-834.
  9. MORRISON, D. E., & Henkel, R. E. (Eds.). (1970). The significance test controversy: A reader. Chicago: Aldine. NICKERSON, R.S. (2000). Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychological Methods, 5, 241-301.
  10. PACHLER, N., BACHMAIR, B. & COOK, J. (2009) Mobile learning: structures, agency, practices (pp. 3-26).
  11. Springer, New York. RESTORE. (2011, July 21). Using statistical regression methods in education research. Retrieved November 15, 2015, from http://www.restore.ac.uk/srme/www/fac/soc/wie/research new/srme/modules/mod1/9/index.html ROZEBOOM, W. W. (1997). Good science is abductive, not hypothetico-deductive. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 335-391).
  12. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. THOMPSON, B. (1993). The use of statistical significance tests in research: Bootstrap and other alternatives. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 361-377.
  13. THOMPSON, B. (1996). AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher, 25, 26-30.
  14. THOMPSON, B. (1999a). If statistic