SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Localization Experiences in Combating Food Insecurity: Practices from Japan, Argentina and Cuba

Gıda Güvencesizliği ile Mücadelede Yerelleşme Deneyimleri: Japonya, Arjantin ve Küba Uygulamaları

Feride Fatma Bilgili(KIRŞEHİR AHİ EVRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5589-5126
Gülizar Çakır Sümer(INONU UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-6642-5130
Pages
1–1
Publication Date
2026-03-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, food localization emerges as a sustainable, equitable, and resilient policy approach to addressing global food insecurity risks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Food insecurity, which is deepening globally, has become an increasingly complex and multilayered problem due to multidimensional factors such as climate change, the monopolization of agricultural production and distribution, neoliberal agricultural policies, economic fluctuations, and widespread poverty.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The cases of Japan, Argentina, and Cuba demonstrate that local production-focused models offer both state-based and community-based strategies for combating food insecurity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, food localization emerges as a sustainable, equitable, and resilient policy approach to addressing global food insecurity risks.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gıda Güvencesizliği · Gıda Güvencesizliğiyle Mücadele · Gıdanın Yerelleştirilmesi

Abstract

Food insecurity, which is deepening globally, has become an increasingly complex and multilayered problem due to multidimensional factors such as climate change, the monopolization of agricultural production and distribution, neoliberal agricultural policies, economic fluctuations, and widespread poverty. This study examines the increasingly important food localization approach in combating food insecurity and analyzes how localization policies are shaped in different socioeconomic and political contexts through the cases of Japan, Argentina, and Cuba. The study focuses on the institutions and mechanisms that shape localization models in countries with differing socioeconomic and political dynamics. The cases of Japan, Argentina, and Cuba demonstrate that local production-focused models offer both state-based and community-based strategies for combating food insecurity. Based on a qualitative research design, the study examines international reports, secondary data, and national policy documents, and analyzes the data using descriptive analysis. The findings demonstrate that localized food systems enhance sustainability by reducing the production-consumption distance, supporting small producers, and increasing social resilience. Consequently, food localization emerges as a sustainable, equitable, and resilient policy approach to addressing global food insecurity risks.

Özet

Küresel ölçekte giderek derinleşen gıda güvencesizliği, iklim değişikliği, tarımsal üretim ve dağıtım süreçlerindeki tekelleşme, neoliberal tarım politikaları, ekonomik dalgalanmalar ve yaygınlaşan yoksulluk gibi çok boyutlu dinamiklerin etkisiyle daha karmaşık ve çok katmanlı bir sorun alanı hâline gelmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, gıda güvencesizliği ile mücadelede giderek önem kazanan gıdanın yerelleştirilmesi yaklaşımını incelemek ve bu yaklaşımın farklı sosyoekonomik ve siyasal bağlamlarda nasıl uygulandığını Japonya, Arjantin ve Küba örnekleri üzerinden analiz etmektir. Farklı sosyo-ekonomik ve politik dinamiklere sahip ülkelerde uygulanan yerelleştirme modellerinin hangi kurum ve mekanizmalarla ortaya çıktığı sorusu bu çalışmanın temel araştırma problemidir. Japonya, Arjantin ve Küba örnekleri, yerel üretim odaklı modellerin gıda güvencesizliği ile mücadelede hem devlet temelli hem de toplumsal tabanlı uygulanabilir stratejiler sunduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Nitel araştırma tasarımına dayanan çalışma kapsamında uluslararası raporlar, ikincil veriler ve ulusal politika belgeleri incelenerek elde edilen veriler betimsel analiz yöntemi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, yerelleşmiş gıda sistemlerinin üretim–tüketim mesafesini azaltarak sürdürülebilirliği güçlendirdiğini, küçük üreticileri desteklediğini ve toplumsal dayanıklılığı artırdığını göstermektedir. Üç ülke örneği, yerel üretim modellerinin gıda güvencesizliği ile mücadelede etkili ve uygulanabilir stratejiler sunduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuç olarak gıdanın yerelleştirilmesi, küresel gıda güvencesizliği risklerine karşı sürdürülebilir, adil ve dirençli bir alternatif politika yaklaşımı olarak değerlendirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bilgili, F. F., Sümer, G. Ç. (2026). Localization Experiences in Combating Food Insecurity: Practices from Japan, Argentina and Cuba. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.1829027

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (75)

  1. ACHOJA, Felix Odemero, OGISI, O’raye Dicta ve OKEKE, Daniel Chukwujioke (2019), “Causal Linkages Between Flood Hazards and Food Insecurity: Evidence from Nigeria”, Çukurova Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, S.34(2), ss.91-99.
  2. ALTIERI, Miguel (2009), “Agroecology, Small Farms, and Food Sovereignty”, Monthly Review, S.61(3), ss.102-113.
  3. ARFINI, Filippo ve MANCINI, Cecilia (2018), “Synergies Between Localized Agri-Food Systems and Short Supply Chains for Geographical Indications in Italy”, Localizing Global Food (Ed. Agni Kalfagianni, Sophia Skordili), Routledge Publishing, New York, ss.104-121.
  4. ATZENI, Maurizio (2022), “Collective Action, Organisation and the Struggle for an Alternative Food System: An Interview with Pocho, Union De Trabajadores De La Tierra, Argentina”, Notebooks: The Journal for Studies on Power, S.2(1), ss.89-107.
  5. BLACK, Elizabeth (2016), Globalization of the Food Industry: Transnational Food Corporations, the Spread of Processed Food, and Their Implications for Food Security and Nutrition, Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection, 2353, https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/ (Erişim Tarihi: 16.12.2025).
  6. BORRAS, Saturnino, KAY, Cristobal, GÓMEZ, Sergio ve WILKINSON, John (2012), “Land Grabbing and Global Capitalist Accumulation: Key Features in Latin America”, Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne d’études Du Développement, S.33(4), ss.402-416.
  7. BOWEN, Sarah ve MUTERSBAUGH, Tad (2014), “Local or Localized? Exploring the Contributions of Franco-Mediterranean Agrifood Theory to Alternative Food Research”, Agriculture and Human Values, S.31, ss.201-213.
  8. CHAMALE, Marvela (2016), “Argentina: La UTT, Una Organización Que Pelea Por Los Productores Rurales”, Bio Diversidad La (E-Haber), https://www.biodiversidadla.org (Erişim Tarihi: 16.12.2025).
  9. CHERONO, Mery, NZENGYA, Daniel ve VUNDI, Nason (2023), “Impact of Funding on Performance of Agricultural Extension Services in Bomet, Kenya: Case of Community-Based Organizations”, African Journal of Empirical Research, S.4(2), ss.937-944.
  10. COHN, Avery, GIL, Juliana N. ve KUHL, Laura (2017), “Smallholder Agriculture and Climate Change”, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, S.42, ss.347-375.
  11. DELGADO, Caroline, TSCHUNKERT, Kristina ve SMITH, Dan (2023), Food Insecurity in Africa: Drivers and Solutions, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Stockholm.
  12. DESALVO, Agustina (2015), “Las Acciones En Defensa De La Tierra En Santiago Del Estero (1990-2012)”, El Caso Del MOCASE - Eutopía: Revista De Desarrollo Económico Territorial, S.8, ss.57-74.
  13. EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY (2020), “Climate Change Adaptation in the Agricultural Sector in Europe”, European Environment Agency (E-Haber), https://www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/climate-change-threatens-future-of (Erişim Tarihi: 16.12.2025).
  14. ETC GROUP (2022), “Food Barons 2022”, ETC Group (Rapor), https://www.etcgroup.org/content/food-barons-2022 (Erişim Tarihi: 16.12.2025).
  15. GEORGE, Justin, ADELAJA, Adesoji ve WEATHERSPOON, Dave (2020), “Armed Conflicts and Food Insecurity: Evidence From Boko Haram's Attacks”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, S.102(1), ss.114-131.
  16. FAO (2014), Growing Greener Cities in Latin America and the Caribbean: An Fao Report on Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture in the Region, FAO Press, Roma.
  17. FAO (2015), “Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture in Latin America and the Caribbean: Havana”, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Press, Rome, https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/dd356dc5-b1ea-4073-831d-7af91de7ffba/content/i2490e03d.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 19.12.2025).
  18. FAO (2022), Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture Sourcebook: From Production to Food Systems, FAO Press, Roma.
  19. FAO (2023), The Urban, Peri-Urban and Family Agriculture Program in Cuba and Municipal Self Sufficiency in Food Supply, FAO Press, Rome, https://www.fao.org/platforms/family-farming/recursos/experiencias/projects-detail/the-urban-peri-urban-and-family-agriculture-program-in-cuba-and-municipal-self-sufficiency-in-food-supply/ (Erişim Tarihi: 20. 12. 2025).
  20. FAO (2024), The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023 (SOFI): Financing to end Hunger, Food Insecurity and Malnutrition in All Its Forms, FAO Press, Roma.
  21. FAO (2025a), “Hunger and Food Insecurity”, Measuring Hunger, https://www.fao.org/hunger/en (Erişim Tarihi: 16.12.2025).
  22. FAO (2025b), “Argentina Selected Indicators”, Data, https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#country/9 (Erişim Tarihi: 16.12.2025).
  23. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP ve WHO (2022), The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2022 - Repurposing Food and Agricultural Policies to Make Healthy Diets More Affordable, FAO Press, Roma.
  24. FELDHOFF, Thomas (2014), “Japan's Food Security Issues: A Geopolitical Challenge for Africa and East Asia?”, Journal of Global Initiatives: Policy, Pedagogy, Perspective, S.9(1), ss.75-96.
  25. FERNANDEZ, Margarita (2017), “Urban Agriculture in Cuba: 30 Years of Policy and Practice”, Urban Agriculture Magazine, S.33, ss.4-44.
  26. GEBELTOVA, Zdeňka, PHIRI, Joseph, BARTONOVA, Klara ve STEININGER, Michael (2024), “Ensuring Food Sovereignty and Nutritional Sustainability in Egypt”, Heliyon, S.10(24), ss.1-20.
  27. GOEDDE, Lutz, DENIS, Nicolas, TANAKA, Masaaki ve YAMADA, Yuito (2017), “Food Security in Japan: Building a Strategy in an Age of Global Competition”, McKinsey (E-Rapor), https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/asia-pacific/food-security-in-japan-building-a-strategy-in-an-age-of-global-competition (Erişim Tarihi: 16.12.2025).
  28. GRAIN (2014), “Hungry for Land”, Grain (E-Haber), https://grain.org/en/article/4952-hungry-for-land (Erişim Tarihi: 16.12.2025).
  29. GRAS, Carolina ve HERNÁNDEZ, Valeria (2020), “Agrarian Struggles in Contemporary Argentina: Beyond the Soy Boom”, Latin American Perspectives, S.47(4), ss.50-66.
  30. GRUBIC, Ana (2023), “Food Security, Food Sovereignty, and Urban Agriculture in Cuba”, Latin American Perspectives, S.51(2), ss.89-105.
  31. HARVEY, David (2003), The New Imperialism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  32. HARVEY, David (2005), A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  33. HEADEY, Derek D. ve MARTIN, Will (2016), “The Impact of Food Prices on Poverty and Food Security”, Annual Review of Resource Economics, S.8, ss.329-351.
  34. HINRICHS, Clare (2003), “The Practice and Politics of Food System Localization”, Journal of Rural Studies, S.19, ss.33-45.
  35. HU, Lin, WANG, Chao ve HE, Ping (2025), “Sustainable Development of Cuban Agricultural Economy: Policy and Practice”, Sustainable Futures, S.9, ss.1-24.
  36. IPCC (2023), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability - Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/ (Erişim Tarihi: 16.12.2025).
  37. KANBİR, Özgür (2011), “Endüstriyel Tarımın Krizi ve Küba Tarımı”, Praksis: Ekolojik Krize Yanıtlar, S.25, ss.49-68.
  38. KESKİN, Elif ve YILDIRIM, Cihan (2019), “Küba’da Kentsel Tarım Uygulamaları: Havana Örneği”, Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi, S.11(2), ss.149-162.
  39. KIMISATO, Osamu, RUPPRECHT, Christopher ve TSUCHIYA, Kayo (2018), “Urban Agriculture as a Sustainability Transition Strategy for Shrinking Cities? Land Use Change Trajectory as an Obstacle in Kyoto City, Japan”, Sustainability, S.10(4), ss.(1048).
  40. KIRWAN, Jamaes ve MAYE, Damian (2013), “Food Security Framings within the UK and the Integration of Local Food Systems”, Journal of Rural Studies, S.29, ss.91-100.
  41. KOHSAKA, Ryo ve KOHYAMA, Shinpei (2022), “State of the Art Review on Land-Use Policy: Changes in Forests, Agricultural Lands and Renewable Energy of Japan”, Land, S.11(5), ss.624-630.
  42. KUNESH, Ashley (2018), “Agroecology in Argentina: Transitioning Farmers to Resilient Agriculture”, Lisans Tezi, Portland State Üniversitesi, Portland.
  43. LAWRENCE, Geoffrey ve SMITH, Kristina (2020), “Neoliberal Globalization and Beyond: Food, Farming, and the Environment”, The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology (Ed. Katharine Legun, Julie C. Keller, Michael Carolan, Michael M. Bell), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ss.411-428).
  44. LESLIE, Isaac (2025),“Beyond Agroecology Versus Organics: Alternative Farmer Subgroups in Buenos Aires Province, Argentina”, Journal of Rural Studies, S.115, ss.(103587).
  45. LOKE, Michael K. ve LEUNG, Ping Sun (2013), “Competing Food Concepts - Implications for Hawaii, USA”, Food and Energy Security, S.2(3), ss.174-184.
  46. MALLICK, Kaushik (2011), Environmental Movements of India: Chipko, Narmada Bachao Andolan, Navdanya, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
  47. McDONALD, Bruce (2008), “Agricultural Policies in Japan: Domestic and International Repercussions”, Japan's Economic Revival: Policy Challenges in a Globalized World (Ed. Daniel A. Citrin, Alessandro Zanello), Palgrave MacMillan Press, London, ss.251-270).
  48. McMICHAEL, Philip (2009), “A Food Regime Genealogy”, Journal of Peasant Studies, S.36(1), ss.139-169.
  49. MACEDO, Ana, ESQUERDO, Veronica ve BORSATTO, Rafael (2023), “Neoliberal Agenda and the Dismantling of Socially-Efficient Public Food Procurement Programs: An Emblematic Case”, Global Food Security, S.37, ss.(100683).
  50. MARTIN, Shields C. ve STOJETZ, Wolfgang (2019), “Food Security and Conflict: Empirical Challenges and Future Opportunities for Research and Policy Making on Food Security and Conflict”, World Development, S.119, ss.150-164.
  51. MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES OF JAPAN (2020), The 2020 Basic Plan for Food, Agriculture and Rural Areas, Government of Japan Press, Tokyo.
  52. MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES OF JAPAN (2021), “Annual Report on Food, Agriculture and Rural Areas in Japan”, MAFF (Rapor), https://www.maff.go.jp/e/index.html (Erişim Tarihi: 16.12.2025).
  53. MIYAKE, Yuko (2016), “Neoliberal Agricultural Policies and Farmers’ Political Power in Japan”, Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers, S.78, ss.216-239.
  54. MOVIMIENTO CAMPESINO DE SANTIAGO DEL ESTERO - MoCaSE (2025), Movimiento Campesino De Santiago Del Estero, MoCaSe, https://www.mocase.org.ar/ (Erişim Tarihi: 23.12.2025).
  55. NAHM, Gabriela (2022), Cuál es el Futuro del Sistema Alimentario en Argentina? El Rol De Los Talleres De Alimentación Sana, Segura Y Soberana Del Área De Alimentación De La UTT En La Lucha Por La Agroecología Y La Soberanía Alimentaria, Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection, 3550, https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/ (Erişim Tarihi: 16.12.2025).
  56. ORAL, Necdet (2014), “Türkiye’de Tarım ve Gıda Sektöründe Yabancılaşma ve Tekelleşme”, Mülkiye Dergisi, S.33(262), ss.325-343.
  57. PREMAT, Addriana (2009), “State Power, Private Plots and the Greening of Havana's Urban Agriculture Movement”, City & Society, S.21(1), ss.28-57.
  58. RABBITT, Matthew P., REED-JONES, Madeline, HALES, Laura J. ve BURKE, Michael P. (2024), Household Food Security in the United States in 2023, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=109895 (Erişim Tarihi: 23.12.2025).
  59. ROBINS, Michael J. (2015), “Exploring “The ‘Localisation’ Dimension of Food Sovereignty”, Third World Quarterly, S.36(3), ss.449-468.
  60. ROSSET, Peter M. ve ALTIERI, Miguel A. (2017), Agroecology: Science and Politics, Fernwood Publishing, Canada.
  61. SARAÇOĞLU, Ebru (2019), “Küba Organik Tarımı: Genel Görünümü, Arka Planı ve İtici Gücü”, Madde, Diyalektik ve Toplum, S.2(1), ss.27-32.
  62. SASADA, Hiroshi ve ITO, Takamichi (2024), “Same Goal, Different Measures: Obscure Transformation in Japan's Food Security Policy (1970-2020)”, Asian Politics & Policy, S.15(3), ss.123-145.
  63. SMITH, Lisa, OBEID, Abdullah ve JENSEN, Holly (2000), “The Geography and Causes of Food Insecurity in Developing Countries”, Agricultural Economics, S.22(2), ss.199-215.
  64. SKORUKS, Dmitrijs (2014), “Complex Econometric Model of Monopolization Process Evaluation”, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, S.110, ss.202-214.
  65. TACOLI, Cecilia, BUKHARI, Budoor ve FISHER, Susannah (2013), “Urban Poverty, Food Security and Climate Change”, International Institute for Environment and Development, https://www.iied.org/10623IIED (Erişim Tarihi: 23.12.2025).
  66. TURMUŞ BİNİCİ, Ezgi (2022), “Küresel Kapitalizmle Bütünleşme Sürecinde Arjantin’de Köylülük: Sorunlar ve Örgütlenmeler”, Mülkiye Dergisi, S.46(1), ss.36-62.
  67. UMEDA, Kenji (2007), “Development and Sustainability of Vegetable Farming in Geothermal Greenhouses: A Case Study of Nigorikawa Area in Mori Town, Hokkaido”, Geographical Review of Japan Series, S.80(5), ss.225-240.
  68. UNION DE TRABAJADORES & TRABAJADORAS DE LA TIERRA (2024), “To Feed is to Resist: Verdurazos and the Struggle Toward Food Sovereignty”, Beyond Molotovs - A Visual Handbook of Anti-Authoritarian Strategies: A Visual Handbook of Anti-Authoritarian Counter-Strategies, Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, ss.128-133.
  69. UTT (2025), “Agroecología y Soberanía Alimentaria”, Union de Trabajadores de la Tierra, https://uniondetrabajadoresdelatierra.com.ar/agroecologia (Erişim Tarihi: 16.12.2025).
  70. WHEELER, Tim ve BRAUN, Joachim (2013), “Climate Change Impacts on Global Food Security”, Science, S.341(6145), ss.508-513.
  71. WILHELMINA, Qaye, JONGERDEN, Joost ve ESSEGBEY, George (2010), “Globalization vs. Localization: Global Food Challenges And Local Solutions”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, S.34(3), ss.357-366.
  72. WORLD BANK (2025), “Food Security Update”, Yoksulluğu Anlamak Brifing Notu, https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/brief/food-security-update (Erişim Tarihi: 16.12.2025).
  73. YOSHIKAWA, Yusaku (2024), “Cultivating Change in Japan's Agricultural Policy”, East Asia Forum, https://eastasiaforum.org/2024/11/07/cultivating-change-in-Japans-agricultural-policy/ (Erişim Tarihi: 16.12.2024).
  74. ZHONG, Ting, CRUSH, Jonathan ve SI, Zhenzhong (2023), “The Nanjing Model: Comprehensive Food System Governance, Localization and Urban Food Security in China”, Global Food Security, S.38, ss.(100709).
  75. ZIEGLER, Jean (2013), Betting on Famine: The World Bank, the IMF, and the Global Food Crisis, The New Press, New York.