Journals / International Journal of Thermodynamics / 2023 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4

Economic, Enviroeconomic Analysis Of Active Solar Still Using Al2O3 Nanoparticles

Pages
68–76
Publication Date
2023-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore overall the proposed system found better to previous system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The water scarcity is primary need of analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The current study analyses the Economic and Enviro-economic of an N-identical (N-PVTCPC) collector double slope solar desalination units (DS-DU) with a heat exchanger (HE) using water based Al2O3 nanoparticles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore overall the proposed system found better to previous system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Economic · CO2 mitigation · Carbon credit earned

Abstract

The water scarcity is primary need of analysis. The current study analyses the Economic and Enviro-economic of an N-identical (N-PVTCPC) collector double slope solar desalination units (DS-DU) with a heat exchanger (HE) using water based Al2O3 nanoparticles. An analytical program fed into MATLAB, and the analysis was monitored on an annual basis New Delhi, India. The Indian Metrological Department in Pune, India provided the input data necessary for the mathematical procedure. Considering the energy production of the winter and summer, the average yearly energy production will be calculated. The system performance has been analyzed based on Economic and Enviro-economic. In an economic analysis was performed for 15 years has found for cost of water 1.25, 1.51, and 1.79₹/kg respectively, Enviro-economic analysis for life span of 15, 20, and 30 years have found CO2 mitigation/ton 40.85, 57.46, and 90.67 kg/ton respectively and carbon credit earned 204.26, 287.30, and 453.36 ($) respectively. The proposed system has foundenergy, yield, and productivity 7.31%, 8.5%, and 5.17% greater respectively. Therefore overall the proposed system found better to previous system.

🔖

Cite This Article

SİNGH, D. (2023). Economic, Enviroeconomic Analysis Of Active Solar Still Using Al2O3 Nanoparticles. International Journal of Thermodynamics, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4, 68–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/1020310

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. S.A. Lawrence, and G.N. Tiwari, “Theoretical evaluation of solar distillation under natural circulation with heat exchanger”, Energy Convers. Manage., 30, pp. 205-213, 1990, https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-8904(90)90001-F. G.N. Tiwari, “Solar energy: fundamentals, design, modelling and applications”, New Delhi/NewYork: CRC Publication/Narosa Publishing House, 2002. G.N. Tiwari, and A.K. Tiwari, “Solar distillation practice for water desalination systems”, New Delhi: Anamaya Publishers, 2008. T.P. Otanicar, and J. Golden, “Comparative environmental and economic analysis of conventional and nanofluid solar hot water technologies”, Environ Sci. Technol., 43, pp. 6082-6087, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1021/es900031j. V. Khullar, and H. Tyagi, “A study on environmental impact of nanofluid based concentrating solar water heating system”, Int J. Environ. Studies., 69, pp. 220-232, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2012.663227.
  2. M. Faizal, R. Saidur, S. Mekhilef, and M.A. Alim, “Energy, economic and environmental analysis of metal oxides nanofluid for flat-plate solar collector”, Energy Convers.,Manage., 76, pp. 162-168, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.07.038.
  3. X. Liu, W. Chen, M. Gu, S. Shen, G. Cao, “Thermal and economic analyses of solar desalination system with evacuated tubular collectors”, Solar Energy, 93, pp.144-50, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.03.009. H. Sharon, and K.S. Reddy, “Performance investigation and enviro-economic analysis of active vertical solar distillation units”, Energy, 84, pp. 794-807, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.045.
  4. R. Dhivagar, M. Mohanraj, K. Hindouri, and Y. Belyayev, “Energy, exergy, economic and enviroeconomic (4E) analysis of gravel coarse aggregate sensible heat storage assisted single slope solar still”, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09766-w. Dharamveer, and Samsher, “Comparative analyses energy matrices and enviro-economics for active and passive solar still”, materialstoday: proceedings, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.001.
  5. A. Shahsavar, P. Talebizadehsardari, and M. Arıcı, Comparative energy, exergy, environmental, exergoeconomic, and enviroeconomic analysis of building integrated photovoltaic/thermal, earth-air heat exchanger, and hybrid systems”, Journal of cleaner production, 362, 132510, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132510.
  6. N.M. Shatar, M. F. M. Sabri, M. F. M. Salleh, and M. H. Ani, “Energy,