Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 39 Sayı: 2

Design and simulation of a novel high acceleration chest compression device

Yeni bir yüksek ivmeli göğüs kompresyon cihazının tasarımı ve simülasyonu

Pages
1137–1152
Publication Date
2023-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The position and velocity-time graphs of the simulation results of the designed piston mechanism are compared with both mathematical modelling and the results of LUCAS-2 and CORPULS devices obtained from another study, and it is confirmed that the proposed mechanism has higher acceleration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), a method of medical intervention for Cardiac Arrest, requires effective chest compressions that energize blood to flow to vital organs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The recommended technique for CPR according to the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines is standard manual CPR.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The position and velocity-time graphs of the simulation results of the designed piston mechanism are compared with both mathematical modelling and the results of LUCAS-2 and CORPULS devices obtained from another study, and it is confirmed that the proposed mechanism has higher acceleration.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:çift kaydırıcı krank · Yüksek ivmeli KPR · dinamik biyel

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), a method of medical intervention for Cardiac Arrest, requires effective chest compressions that energize blood to flow to vital organs. The recommended technique for CPR according to the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines is standard manual CPR. However, in recent years, many different mechanical CPR technologies have been improved to achieve more consistent chest compression. Although these technologies can achieve manual CPR parameters described in AHA guidelines, none have been proven to be superior to manual CPR. A potential explanation of how machines cannot be superior to humans is initial momentum. The human upper body mass can be a good source of momentum during manual CPR, and chest compression with high initial momentum and hence with high acceleration can enable blood to flow in a pulsatile waveform. In this study, a novel mechanical CPR device with a special piston mechanism capable of high acceleration chest compression consisting of a double slider-crank and dynamic conrod is designed. The position and velocity-time graphs of the simulation results of the designed piston mechanism are compared with both mathematical modelling and the results of LUCAS-2 and CORPULS devices obtained from another study, and it is confirmed that the proposed mechanism has higher acceleration.

Özet

Kalp durması için bir tıbbi müdahale yöntemi olan KardiyoPulmoner Resusitasyon (KPR), kanın hayati organlara akması için enerji veren etkili göğüs kompresyonları gerektirir. Amerikan Kalp Derneği (AHA) yönergelerine göre önerilen KPR tekniği standart manuel KPR'dir. Ancak son yıllarda, daha tutarlı göğüs kompresyonu elde etmek için birçok farklı mekanik KPR teknolojisi geliştirilmiştir. Bu teknolojiler, AHA kılavuzlarında belirtilen manuel KPR parametrelerine ulaşabilseler de, hiçbirinin manuel KPR'den daha üstün olduğu henüz kanıtlanmamıştır. Makinelerin insanlardan nasıl daha üstün olamayacağının olası bir açıklaması başlangıç momentumudur. İnsan üst vücut kütlesi, manuel KPR sırasında iyi bir momentum kaynağı olabilir ve yüksek başlangıç momentumlu ve dolayısıyla yüksek ivmeli göğüs kompresyonu, kanın pulsatil bir dalga biçiminde akmasını sağlayabilir. Bu çalışmada, çift kaydırıcı-krank ve dinamik biyelden oluşan yüksek ivmeli göğüs kompresyonu yapabilen özel piston mekanizmalı yeni bir mekanik KPR cihazı tasarlanmıştır. Tasarlanan piston mekanizmasının simülasyon sonuçlarının konum ve hız-zaman grafikleri hem matematiksel model hem de başka bir çalışmadan elde edilen LUCAS-2 ve CORPULS cihazlarının sonuçları ile karşılaştırılmış ve önerilen mekanizmanın daha yüksek ivmeye sahip olduğu doğrulanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAĞIZMAN, A., SEZER, V. (2023). Design and simulation of a novel high acceleration chest compression device. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 39 Sayı: 2, 1137–1152. https://ajindex.com/articles/1020184

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Mehra R. Global public health problem of sudden cardiac death, J Electrocardiol;40,118–22, 2007
  2. Neumar RW, Otto CW, Link MS, Kronick SL, Shuster M, Callaway CW, et al. Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care, Circulation,122,729–67, 2010
  3. Brooks SC, Hassan N, Bigham BL, Morrison LJ. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest, Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2, 2014
  4. Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, Swor RA, Terry M, Bobrow BJ, et al. Part 5: adult basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation,132,414–35, 2015
  5. Perkins GD, Handley AJ, Koster RW, Castrén M, Smyth MA, Olasveengen T, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation, 95, 81–99, 2015
  6. Pozner C. Advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) in adults. UpToDate Waltham, MA2015 2016
  7. American Heart Association (AHA). Highlighths of the 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for CPR and ECC 2020:30,
  8. Sugerman NT, Edelson DP, Leary M, Weidman EK, Herzberg DL, Hoek TL Vanden, et al. Rescuer fatigue during actual in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with audiovisual feedback: a prospective multicenter study, Resuscitation, 80, 981–4, 2009
  9. Abella BS, Alvarado JP, Myklebust H, Edelson DP, Barry A, O’Hearn N, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest, Jama, 293(3):305–10, 2005
  10. Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, Sanders AB, Ewy GA. Importance of continuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: improved outcome during a simulated single lay-rescuer scenario, Circulation, 105 (5):645–9, 2002
  11. Harrison-Paul R. A history of mechanical devices for providing external chest compressions, Resuscitation,73 (3), 330–6, 2007
  12. Krep H, Mamier M, Breil M, Heister U, Fischer M, Hoeft A. Out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the AutoPulseTM system: A prospective observational study with a new load-distributing band chest compression device, Resuscitation, 73(1),86–95, 2007
  13. Steen S, Liao Q,