Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2023 / Sayı: 78

Perceived Self-Efficacy and Academician Burnout: A Research on Relations

Öz Yeterlilik Algıları ve Akademisyen Tükenmişliği: İlişkiler Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Pages
474–490
Publication Date
2023-10-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, regarding the relationship between self-efficacy and burnout, it is understood that no relationship between situational and seasonal - moderate - burnout and high perceived self-efficacy levels has been observed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The profession of "teacher" was first defined with the "Muallimlikte Mesleki İhtisas Tesisine Dair Talimat", in 1900, and the authorities, responsibilities, and rights of teachers were determined with this legislation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result, it is understood that the instructors feel sufficient in student participation skills, teaching strategies, and classroom management skills.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, regarding the relationship between self-efficacy and burnout, it is understood that no relationship between situational and seasonal - moderate - burnout and high perceived self-efficacy levels has been observed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mesleki tükenmişlik · özyeterlik inanışları · öğretim elemanları

Abstract

The profession of "teacher" was first defined with the "Muallimlikte Mesleki İhtisas Tesisine Dair Talimat", in 1900, and the authorities, responsibilities, and rights of teachers were determined with this legislation. Teaching is a stressful profession, which affects the learning/teaching process, especially for the academic staff at state universities. The current study was designed to investigate the relationship between perceived self-efficacy beliefs and burnout of EFL instructors. In this research, with a mixed design, first, a teacher self-efficacy scale was applied to examine the perceived self-efficacy beliefs of the instructors. The instructors', who are among the main academic staff at the universities, burnout levels were measured using a burnout scale. Also, semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted to support the data from the questionnaires. As a result, it is understood that the instructors feel sufficient in student participation skills, teaching strategies, and classroom management skills. On the other hand, burnout analysis revealed that most instructors experienced moderate burnout, which may mean they sometimes feel entirely burnt out, which is not a continuous process. However, regarding the relationship between self-efficacy and burnout, it is understood that no relationship between situational and seasonal - moderate - burnout and high perceived self-efficacy levels has been observed.

Özet

Öğretmenlik mesleğinin tanımı ilk defa 1900 yılında yürürlüğe giren “Muallimlikte Mesleki İhtisas Tesisine Dair Talimat” ile yapılmış, öğretmenlerin yetki, sorumluluk ve hakları bu talimat ile belirlenmiştir. Öğretmenlik stresli bir meslektir, özellikle de devlet üniversitelerinde görev yapan öğretim elemanları dikkate alındığında ve bu stres faktörü öğrenme/öğretme sürecini etkileyen önemli etmenlerdendir. Bu sebeple, bu çalışma üniversitelerde görev yapan öğretim elemanlarının özyeterlik inanışları ve tükenmişlikleri arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmak amacıyla tasarlanmıştır. Karma desene sahip bu araştırmada, öncelikle öğretim elemanlarının özyeterlilik inanışlarını inceleyebilmek için bir öğretmen özyeterlik ölçeği uygulanmıştır. Bu ölçeğe ek olarak, öğretim elemanlarının tükenmişlik düzeyleri bir tükenmişlik ölçeği aracılığı ile ölçülmüştür. Anketlerden toplanan bu bilgilerin desteklenmesi için ise öğretim elemanları ile yarı-yapılandırılmış yüz yüze görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonucunda anlaşılmaktadır ki, öğretim elemanları kendilerini öğrenci katılım becerileri, öğretim stratejileri ve sınıf yönetimi becerileri açısından yeterli hissetmektedirler. Öte yandan, tükenmişlik analizi öğretim elemanlarının çoğunun orta düzeyde tükenmişlik yaşadığını ortaya koymuştur, ki bu durum bazen kendilerini tamamen tükenmiş hissettikleri anlamına gelebilir ancak bu sürekli bir süreç değildir. Fakat, öz-yeterlik ve tükenmişlik arasındaki ilişki incelendiğinde, durumsal ve mevsimsel - orta düzey - tükenmişlik ile yüksek algılanan öz-yeterlik düzeyleri arasında herhangi bir ilişkinin olmadığı anlaşılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALAY, D. (2023). Perceived Self-Efficacy and Academician Burnout: A Research on Relations. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 78, 474–490. https://ajindex.com/articles/1016017

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (vol. 4, pp. 71-81).
  2. Academic Press.
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan. Baş, G., & Yildirim, A. (2012). An analysis of burnout in Turkish elementary school principals. International Journal of Educational Researchers, 3(3), 1-18. http://ijer.eab.org.tr/media/volume3/issue3/gokhan_bas.pdf.
  4. Boomgard, M. C. (2013). Changes in perceived teacher self-efficacy and burnout as a result of facilitated discussion and self-reflection in an online course designed to prepare teachers to work with students with autism. [Doctoral dissertation, The University of San Francisco]. Google Books. Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2000). A longitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived self-efficacy in classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(2), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(99)00057-8.
  5. Bümen, N. T. (2010). The relationship between demographics, self-efficacy, and burnout among teachers. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 10(40), 17-36. https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TVRBNE9USTFOUT09/the-relationship-between-demographics-self-efficacy-and-burnout-among-teachers.
  6. Burke, R. J., & Greenglass, E. R. (1993). Work stress, role conflict, social support, and psychological burnout among teachers. Psychological Reports, 73(2), 371-380. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.73.2.371.
  7. Carson, R. L. (2006). Exploring the episodic nature of teachers’ emotions as it relates to teacher burnout. [Doctoral Dissertation, Purdue University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6384&context=dissertations.
  8. Cephe, P. T. (2010). A study of the factors leading English teachers to burnout. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 38, 25-34. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ893926.
  9. Chan, D. (2007). Burnout, self‐efficacy, and successful intelligence among Chinese prospective and in‐service school teachers in Hong Kong. Educational Psychology, 27(1), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410601061397.
  10. Chang, M. (2009). An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work of teachers. Educational Psychology Review, 21(3), 193-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9106-y.
  11. Çapa Aydin, Y., Cakiroglu, J., & Sarikaya, H. (2005). The development and validation of a Turkish version of the teachers’ sense of efficacy scale. Eğitim ve Bilim, 30(137), 74-81. https://app.trdizin