Journals / Tasarım + Kuram / 2009 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 8 - Cilt: 5 Sayı: 8

Metaphoric Expressions in Industrial Design and Their Methodical Use as a Design Approach

Eğretilemeli Anlatımlar ve Tasarım Yaklaşımı olarak Yöntemli Kullanımı

Pages
95–115
Publication Date
2016-07-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This gives the designer a good opportunity to give whatever shape necessary to his or her product by using different metaphors

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The industrial designer who wants to design a product that will fulfill the needs and desires of a modern consumer should concentrate well on the messages his or her products shall convey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Though they don't incorporate any mechanical parts and their physical properties are suitable, electronic systems can take many different shapes and fit into many different volumes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This gives the designer a good opportunity to give whatever shape necessary to his or her product by using different metaphors
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:endüstri · ürün · tasarım

Abstract

The industrial designer who wants to design a product that will fulfill the needs and desires of a modern consumer should concentrate well on the messages his or her products shall convey. For this purpose, signs which are suitable for the context and designer's intentions must be created and used on the product very carefully. The methods that can be used by a product designer to create products with clear signs have been the subject of many researches. One of the conceptual tools which hasn't been academically researched in detail so far is the metaphor. Usage of metaphors in electronic products can give many opportunities to the industrial designer. Though they don't incorporate any mechanical parts and their physical properties are suitable, electronic systems can take many different shapes and fit into many different volumes. This gives the designer a good opportunity to give whatever shape necessary to his or her product by using different metaphors

Özet

Kullanıcı istek ve ihtiyaçlarını daha iyi karşılayabilecek ürünler ortaya çıkartmak isteyen endüstri tasarımcısının, ürünlerin taşıyacağı iletileri iyi oluşturması gerekmektedir. Bunun için bağlam ve amaca uygun işaretler tasarlanarak ürünlere yerleştirilmelidir. Ürün tasarımcısının çok açık işaretler taşıyan ürünler ortaya çıkartabilmesi için kullanabileceği yöntemler, detaylı şekilde işlenmiş bir konudur. Göstergebilime ait çeşitli araçlar, endüstri ürün tasarımına uygulanmaya çalışılmıştır. Eğretileme bu amaç için kullanılırlığı günümüze değin pek detaylı araştırılmamış bir kavram-araçtır. Eğretilemenin ürün biçimsel özelliklerinin belirlenmesinde kullanımı, tasarımcıya önemli olanaklar sunabilir. Yoğun olarak elektronik tabanlı modern ürünler, fiziksel özellikleri ve mekânik parça kullanımlarının az olması nedeni ile çok çeşitli şekillere rahatlıkla girebilirler. Bu da ürün tasarımcısının, teknik gereksinimlere takılmadan, eğretilemelerden istediği gibi faydalanarak, sahibi ile duygusal kültürel bağlar kuran, kullanıcı dostu ürünler tasarlayabilmesini kolaylaştıracaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özsoy, Ö., Bayrakçı, O. (2016). Metaphoric Expressions in Industrial Design and Their Methodical Use as a Design Approach. Tasarım + Kuram, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 8 - Cilt: 5 Sayı: 8, 95–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/1007579

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. A.I.A. Costa, D. Schoolmeester, M. Dekker ve W.M.F. Jongen. 2003. Exploring the Use of Consumer Collages in Product Design. Product Design & Quality Management.Wageningen University. Appleton. Bloch, Peter H., Brunel, Frederic F., and Arnold Todd J. 2003. “Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement”. Journal of Consumer Research. 29 (March), 551-65.
  2. Aubry, D. and Vavik, T. 1992:
  3. Produktdesign, Barthes, Roland ([1970] 1988). The Old Rhetoric: An Aide-Memoire. In The Semiotic Challenge. trans. Richard Howard. Bayrakç›, O. 2004. Ça¤dafl ‹letiflim Kuramlar› Aç›s›ndan Tasar›mda ‹letiflimsel Modeller. Mimar Sinan Üniversitesi.
  4. Butter, Reinhart. 1993. “Where Meanings Escape Functions,” Design Management Journal. 4(2), 30-37. ‘Design Is Making Sense (of Things)’,” Design Issues, 5(2), 9-39.
  5. Butter, Reinhart. 1984. “Exploring the Symbolic Qualities of Form” Innovation. 3(2): 4-9. Carl-Gustaf Lundholm. 2003. The Use of Metaphors in Product Design. Department of Product Design. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Dan Saffer. 2005. The Role of Metaphor in Interaction Design. The School of Design. Carnegie Mellon University. Dumas, A. 1999. Building totems: Metaphormaking in Prod uct Development. Design Management Journal. Winter. Dumas, Angela. Winter 1994. Building Totems: MetaphorMaking in Product Development. Design Management Journal. 71-82.
  6. Feldman, Jerome A. 2006. From Molecule to Metaphor. A Neural Theory of Language. The Massachusetts. MIT Press. Fouro boros, 2009.
  7. Brain, Metaphor, Archetype, Brand. http://www.alchemysite.com/blog/brain_brand_01.html
  8. Fu-Yuan, Li, 2005. Made in Taiwan: Using Metaphor as a Design Strategy. Gregan-Paxton, Jennifer and Roedder John, Deborah. 1997. Consumer Learning by Analogy: A model of Internal Knowledge Transfer. Journal of Consumer Research. 24 (December): 266-84.
  9. Holbrook, Morris B. and Hirschman, Elizabeth C. 1982. The Experiential Aspects of Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research. 9 (September):132-140. Hong Cheng. 2006. The Study of Cultural Interface in Taiwan Aboriginal Twin-Cup. Postgraduate School of Industrial Design. Chang Gung University. Kawama, Tetsuo 1990. A Semiotic Approach to Product Forms. In The Semiotic Web. Krippendorff, Butter. 1984. Product Semantics: Exploring the symbolic qualities of form.Innovation. vol 3 no 2. Kristen T. Rosenzweig. 2007. Speaking Metaphorically in Product Design. B.F.A, School of Design, the Art Institute of Chicago