SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences / 2026 / Cilt: 30 Sayı: 1

Body Weight and Body Measurement Traits of Hair, Alpine x Hair F1 and Saanen x Hair F1 Crossbred Does Raised at Rural Conditions in Konya Province

Hakan Erduran
Birol Dağ
Pages
49–53
Publication Date
2016-12-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, İt can be said that the live weight traits of Hair goats were higher than SHF 1 crossbred does under the rural conditions, while live weight of SHF 1 crossbred does may be succeed through adaptation and selective breeding programmers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to determine the pre-mating period live weights and body measurements of 216 head of Hair, 232 head of Alpine x Hair F 1 (AHF 1 ) and 167 head of Saanen x Hair F 1 crossbred does (SHF 1 ) were raised at three different herds in the Selçuklu, Konya provinces under semi intensive conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Average live weights of Hair, AHF 1 and SHF 1 crossbred does were found 50.8 kg, 50.1 kg and 48.9 kg respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, İt can be said that the live weight traits of Hair goats were higher than SHF 1 crossbred does under the rural conditions, while live weight of SHF 1 crossbred does may be succeed through adaptation and selective breeding programmers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the pre-mating period live weights and body measurements of 216 head of Hair, 232 head of Alpine x Hair F 1 (AHF 1 ) and 167 head of Saanen x Hair F 1 crossbred does (SHF 1 ) were raised at three different herds in the Selçuklu, Konya provinces under semi intensive conditions. Average live weights of Hair, AHF 1 and SHF 1 crossbred does were found 50.8 kg, 50.1 kg and 48.9 kg respectively. The effects of genotype, parity, herd and year on the live weight (P<0.01) were significant. In this study, the average withers height, rump height, body length, hearth girth, leg girth, left wrist girth, chest width, rump width and chest depth of Hair, AHF 1 and SHF 1 crossbred does were measured as 71.7 cm, 71.3 cm and 70.8 cm; as 72.4 cm, 71.9 cm and 71.5 cm; as 69.1 cm, 68.8 cm and 68.3 cm; as 83.0 cm, 82.2 cm and 81.9 cm; as 56.4 cm, 56.0 cm and 55.5 cm; as 11.4 cm, 11.3 cm and 11.2 cm; as 16.6 cm, 16.6 cm and 16.4 cm; as 17.0 cm, 17.0 cm and 16.8 cm; as 32.5 cm, 32.4 cm and 32.2 cm respectively. The effect of genotype (except for hearth girth and chest depth), parity, herd and year on the all examined traits (P<0.01; P<0.05) were significant. As a result, İt can be said that the live weight traits of Hair goats were higher than SHF 1 crossbred does under the rural conditions, while live weight of SHF 1 crossbred does may be succeed through adaptation and selective breeding programmers.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erduran, H., Dağ, B. (2016). Body Weight and Body Measurement Traits of Hair, Alpine x Hair F1 and Saanen x Hair F1 Crossbred Does Raised at Rural Conditions in Konya Province. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 1, 49–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/1005291

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Akman N, Aşkın Y, Cengiz F, Ertugrul M, Fıratlı C, Türkoglu M, Yener SM (1997). Keçi yetiştirme, (Editör M. Ertugrul) Hayvan yetiştirme, Ankara, pp. 185-210.
  2. Alızadehasl M, Ünal N (2011). Kilis, Norduz ve Hon-amlı Keçilerinde bazı morfolojik özellikler. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 51, 81-92.
  3. Boztepe S, Dağ B (1995). İvesi koyunlarında vücut ölçüleri ile verim özellikleri arasındaki ilişkiler. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 6 (8): 6, 173-180.
  4. Browning R, Leite-Browning ML (2009). Reproductive, growth, and fitness traits among Boer, Kiko, and Spanish meat goats semi-intensively managed in the southeastern US. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 11, 109-113.
  5. Çam MA, Olfaz M, Soydan E (2010). Possibilities of using morphometrics characteristics as a tool for body weight prediction in Turkish Hair Goats (Kıl keçi). Asian Journal of Animaland Veterinary Ad-vances 5, 52-59.
  6. Darcan KN (2000). Çukurova bölgesi subtropik iklim koşullarında geliştirilen bazı keçi genotiplerinin bu koşullardaki adaptasyon mekanizmaları üzerinde karşılaştırmalı araştırmalar. (yayınlanmamış doktora tezi) Çukurova Üniversitesi.
  7. Düzgüneş O (1993). İstatistik metodları, Ankara Ün-iversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları: 1291, Ankara.
  8. Elmaz Ö, Saatçi M, Mamak N, Dağ B, Aktaş AH, Gök B (2012). The determination of some morphologi-cal characteristics of Honamlı goat and kids, de-fined as a new indigenius goat breed of Turkey, Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 18, 481-485.
  9. Elmaz Ö, Çolak M, Akbaş AA, Korkmaz Ağaoğlu Ö, Saatçi M (2016). The determination of some mor-phological traits and phenotypic correlations of Turkish Hair goat (Kıl keçisi) breed reared in exten-sive conditions in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Vet-erinary Sciences 32, 2, 94-100.
  10. GDARP (2011). Domestic Animal Genetic Resources in Turkey. Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policy (GDARP) of the Ministry of Food Agriculture and Livestock, Ankara,
  11. Gürsoy O (2005). Small Ruminant Breeds of Turkey, In Iniguez, L. (ed) Characterization of small rumi-nant beeds in west Asia and north Africa, pp.382-390.
  12. Karabacak A, Zülkadir U, Aytekin İ, Keskin İ, Boztepe S (2010). Akkaraman kuzularda besi başı vücut ölçüleriyle soğuk karkas ağırlığı arasındaki ilişkilerin path analizi ile araştırılması. Selçuk Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi 24, 36-39.
  13. Maksimovic N, Bauman F, Petrovic MP, Petrovic VC, Ruzic-Muslic D, Micic N, Milosevic-Stankovic I (2015). Productive characteristics and body meas-urements of Alpine goats raised under smallholder production systems in central Serbia. Biotechnolo-gy in Animal Husbandry 31, 245-253.
  14. Mason IL (1981). Breeds. In Call, C. (ed) Goat produc-tion, Academic Press, London, pp. 57-110.
  15. Nemeth T, Kukovics S (2016). Evaluation of body morphology and production traits of goat breeds in Hungary, In Sustainable goat breeding and goat farming in Central and Eastern European Coun-tries, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp. 127-132.
  16. SAS (2013). Institute Inc. New features in JMP® 11. Cary, North Carolina, USA. http://www.jmp.com/support/notes/41/addl/fusion_41004_16_new_features.pdf.
  17. Tölü C, Savaş T, Yurtman İY (2009). Türk Saanen keçilerinde canlı ağırlık ve değişimi üzerinde değer-lendirmeler, Hayvansal Üretim 50, 9-17.
  18. TUİK (2015). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Veritabanları, Hayvanclık İstatistikleri,
  19. http://rapory.tuik.gov.tr/14-07-2016-17:58:10-34625004598545479679247054. (Erişim tari-hi:15.08.2016)
  20. Zülkadir U, Şahin Ö., Aytekin İ, Boztepe S, (2008). Malya kuzularda canlı ağırlık ve bazı vücut ölçüle-rinin tekrarlanma dereceleri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 22, 89-93.