Processing Instruction Revisited: Does it Lead to Superior Performance in Interpretation and Production?

Abstract

There have been plenty of research studies which have demonstrated the efficacy of focus on form (FonF)approach in language teaching. However, processing instruction as a kind of FonF approach has not beengiven due attention. As such, the present study is an attempt to shed more lights upon the effects of theprocessing instruction (PI) on EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners’ acquisition of passive voiceby comparing PI to dictogloss and an output instruction. The participants recruited for the study were 51pre-intermediate level EFL students. The pretest revealed that there was no significant differencebetween the groups regarding passive voice knowledge. As to the treatment, the first group (n=17)received processing instruction, the second group (n=17) was exposed to dictogloss tasks, and the third(n=17) was given meaningful output instruction. In the immediate posttest, two types of tasks(interpretation and production) were used to assess the participants’ English passive voicecomprehension and production. The findings indicated that the processing instruction groupoutperformed dictogloss and meaningful output instruction in both tasks, and thus it had a significantlypositive effect on the comprehension and production of the English passive voice.© 2019 EJAL & the Authors. Published by Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics (EJAL). This is an open-accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).