Dergiler / HAYEF Journal of Education / 2010 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

Analyzing Turkish MA Students' Use of Lexical Hedging Strategies in Theses Abstracts

Sayfa
49–62
Yayın Tarihi
2012-03-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EKOÇ, A. (2012). Analyzing Turkish MA Students' Use of Lexical Hedging Strategies in Theses Abstracts. HAYEF Journal of Education, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 49–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/992463

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Burrough-Boenisch, J. (2005). NS and NNS scientists' amendment s of Dutch scientific English and their impact on hedging. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (1), 25-39.
  2. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 post graduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13 (2), 133-151.
  3. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman. Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: articles. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland, Writing: texts, processes and practices (pp. 99-122). London: Longman. Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academi c writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (3), 239-256.
  4. Johns, A. (2001). Book review: hedging in scientific research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20 (2), 200-203.
  5. Jordan, R.R. (1997). English for academic purposes: a guide and resource book for teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Kamler, B.& Thomson, P. (2004). Driven to abstraction: doctoral supervision and writing pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 9 (2), 195-209.
  7. Koutsantoni, D. (2006). Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academi c literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5 (1), 19-36.
  8. Lewin, B.A. (2005). Hedging: an exploratory study of authors' and readers' identification of 'toning down ' in scientific texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4 (2), 163-178.
  9. McEnery, T.& Kifle, N. A. (2002). Epistemic modality in argumentative essays of second language writers. In J. Flowerdew, Academic Discourse (pp. 182¬ 196). London: Longman. Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (2), 149-171.
  10. Salager-Meyer, F. (2000). Procrustes' recipe: hedging and positivism. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 175-187.
  11. Silver, M. (2003). The stance of stance: a critical look at way s stance is expressed and modeled in academi c discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (4), 359-374.
  12. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research setting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Varttala, T. (1999). Remark s on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for Specific Purposes, 18 (2), 177-200.