It is concluded that for Nietzsche freedom is always premised upon a relationship of the self to itself, whereas for Spinoza it devolves on a relationship between self and others.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Nietzsche’s concept of freedom is premised upon a conception of the relationship between freedom and necessity; here I examine that concept of freedom against the background of the philosophy of Spinoza.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Both offer powerful accounts of how freedom and necessity might be reconciled; this essay sets out the difference between them by breaking the problem down into those of selfhood, time, reason and culture.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is concluded that for Nietzsche freedom is always premised upon a relationship of the self to itself, whereas for Spinoza it devolves on a relationship between self and others.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Freedom · Self · Reason
Özet
Nietzsche’s concept of freedom is premised upon a conception of the relationship between freedom and necessity; here I examine that concept of freedom against the background of the philosophy of Spinoza. Both offer powerful accounts of how freedom and necessity might be reconciled; this essay sets out the difference between them by breaking the problem down into those of selfhood, time, reason and culture. It is concluded that for Nietzsche freedom is always premised upon a relationship of the self to itself, whereas for Spinoza it devolves on a relationship between self and others.
Turner, Z. T. (2016). Nietzsche and Spinoza: Thinking Freedom. Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, Sayı: 26, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.21936
ANSELL-PEARSON, Keith (2005), How to Read Nietzsche, London: Granta.
DELLA ROCCA, Michael (2002), “Spinoza’s Substance Monism”, in Spinoza: The Metaphysical Themes, ed. by Olli Koistinen & J. I. Biro, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DELEUZE, Gilles (1992), Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, trans. Martin Joughin, New York: Zone Books.
DUDLEY, Will (2008), Hegel, Nietzsche and Philosophy: Thinking Freedom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LLOYD, Genevieve (1996), Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Spinoza and Ethics, London; New York: Routledge.
MONTAG, Warren (2000), Bodies, Masses, Power, London; New York: Verso.
NIETZSCHE, Friedrich (2002), Beyond Good and Evil, trans. Judith Norman, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
NIETZSCHE, Friedrich (1997), Daybreak, trans. R. J. Hollingdale, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
NIETZSCHE, Friedrich (2007), On the Genealogy of Morality, ed. by Keith Ansell-Pearson, trans. Carol Diethe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
NIETZSCHE, Friedrich (1974), The Gay Science, trans. Walter Kaufmann, New York: Vintage Books.
NIETZSCHE, Friedrich (1971), Thus Spoke Zarathustra in The Portable Nietzsche, ed. by Walter Kaufmann, London: Chatto and Windus.
NIETZSCHE, Friedrich (2005), Twilight of the Idols in The Anti-Christ, Ecce Homo, Twilight of the Idols and Other Writings, ed. by Aaron Ridley & Judith Norman, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SPINOZA, Baruch (1996), Ethics, London: Penguin.
SPINOZA, Baruch (1951), Tractatus Politicus, trans. R. H. M. Elwes, New York: Dover Publications.
URS SOMMER, Andreas (2012), “Nietzsche’s Readings on Spinoza”, Journal of Nietzsche Studies, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 156-184.
YOVEL, Yirmiyahu (1992), Spinoza and Other Heretics, Oxford: Princeton University Press.