Dergiler / Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2

Özelleşen Savaş ve Askeri Şirketlerin İnsan Hakları Sorumlulukları

Privatised War and Responsibilities of Military Companies

Mehmet Özyürek(YALOVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7980-4655
Sayfa
254–270
Yayın Tarihi
2023-10-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu çalışma, günümüz küresel dünyasında savaşın özelleşmesini analiz etmenin yanı sıra ÖAŞ’lerin bağlayıcı olmayan yumuşak hukuk ilkeleri ile uluslararası yönetişiminde ortaya çıkabilecek sorunların normatif bir analizini sunmayı hedeflemektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Küreselleşme özel sektörün payını birçok alanda artırmaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Geleneksel olarak ulus devletlerin sorumluluğu altında değerlendirilen eğitim, sağlık, demiryolları gibi hizmetler bugünün küresel dünyasında birçok ülkede özel şirketler tarafından yerine getirilmektedir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu çalışma, günümüz küresel dünyasında savaşın özelleşmesini analiz etmenin yanı sıra ÖAŞ’lerin bağlayıcı olmayan yumuşak hukuk ilkeleri ile uluslararası yönetişiminde ortaya çıkabilecek sorunların normatif bir analizini sunmayı hedeflemektedir.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Küreselleşme · uluslararası hukuk · insan hakları

Özet

Küreselleşme özel sektörün payını birçok alanda artırmaktadır. Geleneksel olarak ulus devletlerin sorumluluğu altında değerlendirilen eğitim, sağlık, demiryolları gibi hizmetler bugünün küresel dünyasında birçok ülkede özel şirketler tarafından yerine getirilmektedir. Ayrıca özel işletmeler ulusal hükümetlere silah, silahlı personel ve güvenlik hizmetleri de sağlamaktadır. Son yıllarda yaşanan savaşlar bu özel işletmelerden olan özel askeri şirketlere (ÖAŞ) olan ilgiyi ve talebi artırmıştır. ÖAŞ’lere olan talep artarken savaşların geleceğinde bu şirketlerin rolünün daha önemli hale geleceği tahmin edilmektedir. Öte yandan son 20 yılda ÖAŞ’lerin insan hakları ihlalleri tüm dünyanın dikkatini çekmektedir. ÖAŞ personellerinin karıştığı hak ihlalleri çoğu zaman cezasız kalmaktadır. ÖAŞ’lerin uluslararası denetimi önünde birçok engel bulunmakla birlikte söz konusu şirketlerin insan hakları konusunda küresel denetimini sağlayacak bağlayıcı bir sözleşmeye henüz ulaşılamamıştır. Diğer taraftan söz konusu şirketlerin kontrolünü sağlamak adına bağlayıcı olmayan bazı iyi uygulama ilkeleri oluşmaktadır. Söz konusu ilkeler ÖAŞ’leri diğer sektörlerde olduğu gibi piyasa mekanizmaları aracılığıyla düzenleyerek bu şirketlere etik sorumluluklar yüklemeyi hedeflemektedir. Bu gelişmeler ve ÖAŞ’lerin uluslararası denetimindeki zorluklar ÖAŞ'lerin sosyal ve etik sorumluluklarının tartışılmasını da elzem kılmaktadır. Literatürde ÖAŞ’lerin bazı sorumluluklar üstlenebileceği iddia edilmiş olsa da bu çalışmada söz konusu sorumlulukların devletlerin politik tutumları üzerinden şekilleneceği vurgulanmaktadır. Bu çalışma, günümüz küresel dünyasında savaşın özelleşmesini analiz etmenin yanı sıra ÖAŞ’lerin bağlayıcı olmayan yumuşak hukuk ilkeleri ile uluslararası yönetişiminde ortaya çıkabilecek sorunların normatif bir analizini sunmayı hedeflemektedir.

Abstract

Globalisation is the main factor improving the share of private actors in different sectors. In today’s global world, a myriad of services, traditionally known as the responsibility of nation states, are being fulfilled by private companies in different countries. Companies address a significant portion of the public needs through private schools, hospitals, railway services etc. Moreover, private companies also provide weapons, armed combat, and security services for national governments. Private Military Companies (PMCs) is one of these companies which have gained importance in the recent wars. It is also expected that the demand for PMSCs will be augmented in the future wars. In addition, human rights violations of PMCs have attracted the attention of the whole world over a couple of decades. The mercenaries of the PMCs responsible for these human rights violations have been unpunished since there are many obstacles in the international regulation of PMCs. Unfortunately, in today’s world, there is no international treaty to regulate global activities of PMCs with respect to human rights. However, some soft law documents, such as non-binding guidelines and codes of conduct, aim to control the activities of PMCs. Such soft law norms focus on improving the ethical behaviour of PMCs through market mechanisms like the codes in other private sectors. These developments and the difficulties in terms of regulation of international activities of PMCs make the discussion of social and ethical responsibilities of PMCs significant. Even though it is claimed that PMCs may have some ethical responsibilities in the existing literature, this study asserts that such responsibilities are likely to be affected by the political interests of national governments. Besides investigating the privatisation of war in today’s global world, this study analyses the difficulties in the international governance of PMCs through non-binding soft law norms.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Özyürek, M. (2023). Özelleşen Savaş ve Askeri Şirketlerin İnsan Hakları Sorumlulukları. Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 254–270. https://ajindex.com/articles/970740

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (67)

  1. Acheson, A. (2016). Socially Responsible Security Providers? Analysing Norm Internalisation among private security providers. Joakim Berndtsson ve Christopher Kinsey (ed.). the Routledge Research Companion to Security Outsourcing içinde. London: Routledge.
  2. Al Jazeera. (2021, 13 Aralık). EU slaps sanctions on Russian mercenary group Wagner. Erişim adresi https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/12/13/eu-slaps-sanctions-on-russian-mercenary-wagner-group
  3. Al Jazeera. (2022, 5 Kasım). Russian mercenary force Wagner opens first official headquarters. Erişim adresi https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/11/5/russian-mercenary-force-wagner-opens first-official- headquarters
  4. Al-Marashi, I. (2023, 12 Agustos). Blackwater paved the way for Wagner. Erişim adresi https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2023/8/12/blackwater-paved-the-way-for-wagner
  5. Armstrong, S. (2006, 20 Mayıs). The enforcer. the Guardian. Erişim adresi https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2006/may/20/comment.military
  6. BBC News. (2018, 2 Ağustos). Russia shocked by mysterious murder of three journalists in CAR. Erişim adresi https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45030087
  7. BBC News. (2020, 7 Mayıs). Wagner, shadowy Russian military group, 'fighting in Libya'. Erişim adresi https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-52571777
  8. Byrne, E. F. (2007). Assessing arms makers’ corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 201-17.
  9. Cancian, M. F. (2022, 2 Mayıs). The Next Step in U.S. Aid to Ukraine: Operational Contractors. Center for Strategic & International Studies. Erişim adresi https://www.csis.org/analysis/next-step-us- aid-ukraine-operational-contractors
  10. Chatterjee, P. ve Thompson, A. C. (7 Mayıs 2004). Private contractors and torture at Abu Ghraib, Iraq, CorpWatch. Erişim adresi https://www.corpwatch.org/article/private-contractors-and-torture-abu-ghraib-iraq
  11. Cohen, D. ve Mikaelian, A. (2021). The Privatization of everything: How the plunder of public goods transformed America and how we can fight back. New York: The New Press.
  12. Creyer, E. H. (1997) The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, (14), 421-432.
  13. Davenport, C. (2014, 26 Kasım). Pentagon imposes strict standards on private security firms. Washington Post. Erişim adresi https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/pentagon-imposes-strict-standards-on-private-security-firms/2014/11/26/4b018ff8-7421-11e4-9c9f-a37e29e80cd5_story.html?wprss=rss_business
  14. Debusmann, B. (2022, 9 Mart). Private military firms see demand in Ukraine war. BBC News. Erişim adresi https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-60669763
  15. Dobbs, M. (1998, 30 Kasım). Ford and GM Scrutinized for Alleged Nazi Collaboration. Washington Post. Erişim adresi https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/nov98/nazicars30.htm
  16. Euronews. (2020, 23 Aralık). Trump'ın Irak'ta sivil katliamına karışan 4 eski paralı askeri affetmesi tepki çekti, Erişim adresi https://tr.euronews.com/2020/12/23/trump-tan-rusya-sorusturmas-nda-suclu-bulunan-isimler-de-dahil-20-kisiye-ozel-af
  17. Gordon, M. R., Strobel, W. P., Luxmoore, M. ve Cullison, A. (2023, 24 Ağustos) Early Intelligence Suggests Prigozhin Was Assassinated, U.S. Officials Say. Washington Post. Erişim adresi https://www.wsj.com/world/russia/wagner-prigozhin-russia-assassinated-intelligence-3e456fab
  18. Halpern, B. H. ve Snider, K. F. (2012). Products that kill and corporate social responsibility: The case of US defense firms. Armed Forces & Society, 38(4), 604-624.
  19. Hayri, E. (2022, 13 Nisan). Blackwater ve Wagner arasında: Dünya savaşlarını paralı askerler mi yürütüyor? Independent Türkçe. Erişim adresi https://www.indyturk.com/node/497396/d%C3%BCnya/blackwater-ve-wagner-aras%C4%B1nda-d%C3%BCnya-sava%C5%9Flar%C4%B1n%C4%B1-paral%C4%B1-askerler-mi-y%C3%BCr%C3%BCt%C3%BCyor
  20. Hodge, N. (2023, 14 Temmuz). Wagner ‘does not exist’: Why Putin claims a rift in the mercenary group, CNN. Erişim adresi https://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/14/europe/russia-putin-wagner-prigozhin-tensions-intl/index.html
  21. International Committee of the Red Cross and the Government of Switzerland. (2008, 17 Eylül). The Montreux Document on pertinent international legal obligations and good practices for States related to operations of private military and security companies during armed conflict. Erişim adresi https://shop.icrc.org/the-montreux-document-on-private-military-and-security-companies-pdf-en.html
  22. International Committee of the Red Cross. (2010). Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I) of 8 June 1977. Erişim adresi www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/icrc_002_0321.pdf
  23. Kinley, D. ve Tadaki, J. (2004). From talk to walk: The emergence of human rights responsibilities for corporations at international law. Virginia Journal of International Law, 44 (4).
  24. Kirby, J. (2023, 21 Mart). The Wagner Group, Russia’s maybe-private army in Ukraine, explained. Vox. Erişim adresi https://www.vox.com/world-politics/2023/3/21/23622615/ukraine-war-bakhmut-wagner-group-russia
  25. Lebedev, F. ve Light, F. (2023, 16 Mart). Wagner’s convicts tell of horrors of Ukraine war and loyalty to their leader. Reuters. Erişim adresi https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/ukraine-crisis-russia-wagner/
  26. Liu, H. Y. (2015). Law’s impunity: Responsibility and the modern private military company. Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  27. Lu, R. Redwood, B. ve De Velde, J. V. (t.y.). Inherently Governmental Functions and the Role of Private Military Contractors. Allard K. Lowenstein International Human Rights Clinic. Erişim adresi https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Mercenaries/WG/AllardKLowensteinIHRClinic.pdf
  28. Machiavelli, N. (2019). ‘The Prince’. Quentin Skinner ve Russell Price (ed.). Machiavelli: The Prince. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  29. MacLeod, S. ve McArdle, S. (2009). International responsibility and accountability of the corporation: International initiatives for holding corporations to account and their viability with regard to private military and security companies. EUI AEL. 2009/29, PRIV-WAR Project. Erişim adresi https://hdl.handle.net/1814/13575
  30. Mayer-Sommer, A. P. ve Roshwalb, A. (1996). An Examination of the relationship between ethical behavior, espoused ethical values, and financial performance in the U.S. defense industry: 1988–1992. Journal of Business Ethics, 15,1249-74.
  31. Mayer, D. (2009). Peaceful warriors: Private military security companies and the quest for stable societies. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 387-401.
  32. McCrudden, C. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Procurement. D. J. McBarnet, A. Voiculescu ve T. Campbell (ed.). The new corporate accountability: Corporate social responsibility and the law içinde. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  33. McFate, S. (2014). The modern mercenary: Private armies and what they mean for world order.New York: Oxford University Press.
  34. McFate, S. (2019). Mercenaries and War. Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press.National
  35. Consumers League. (2012). Survey says consumers willing to sacrifice for humane factories. Erişim adresi http://www.natlconsumersleague.org/worker-rights/105-worker-safety/647-survey-says-consumers-willing-to-sacrifice-for-humane-factories
  36. O'Rourke, A. (2013). A new politics of engagement: Shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, (12), 227, 228.
  37. OECD. (2011). OECD Guidelines for multinational enterprises on responsible business conduct. OECD Publishing. Erişim adresi https://doi.org/10.1787/81f92357-en.
  38. OHCHR. (2021, 27 Ekim). CAR: Russian Wagner Group harassing and intimidating civilians – UN experts. Erişim adresi https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2021/11/car-russian-wagner- group-harassing-and-intimidating-civilians-un-experts
  39. Patta, D. ve Carter, S. (2023, 16 Mayıs). How Russia's Wagner Group funds its role in Putin's Ukraine war by plundering Africa's resources. Erişim adresi CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-wagner-group-ukraine-war-putin-prigozhin-africa-plundering-resources/
  40. Petkova, M. (2020, 1 Ekim). What has Russia gained from five years of fighting in Syria?. Al Jazeera. Erişim adresi https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2020/10/1/what-has-russia-gained-from-five-years-of-fighting-in-syria
  41. Pieper, O. (2023, 28 Haziran). Wagner Group: what are private military companies?. DW. Erişim adresi https://www.dw.com/en/wagner-group-what-are-private-military-companies/a-66062061
  42. Ralby, I. (2016). The Montreux Document: the legal significance of a non-legal instrument. Gary Schaub Jr. ve Ryan Kelty (ed.). Private military and security contractors: Controlling the corporate warrior içinde (s. 235-264). London: Rowman & Littlefield.
  43. Ranganathan, S. (2009). Between complicity and irrelevance? Industry associations and the challenge of regulating private security contractors. Georgetown Journal of International Law (41), 303, 310-17.
  44. Reynolds, N. (2019). Putin’s Not-So-Secret Mercenaries: Patronage, Geopolitics, and the Wagner Group. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Erişim adresi https://carnegieendowment.org/files/GlobalRussia_NateReynolds_Vagner.pdf
  45. Riordan, C. M., Gatewood, R. D. ve Bill, J. J. (1997). Corporate image: employee reactions and implications for managing corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, (16), 401, 410.
  46. Risen, J. (2008, 24 Mayıs). Controversial contractor’s Iraq work is split up. New York Times. Erişim adresi https://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/24/world/middleeast/24contract.html
  47. Roth, A. (2019, 21 Kasım). Man who filmed beheading of Syrian identified as Russian mercenary. the Guardian. Erişim adresi https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/21/man-filmed-killing-torture-syrian-identified-russian-mercenary-wagner
  48. Ruggie, J. G. (2013). Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights. New York: W. W.Norton & Company
  49. Salih, Z. M. ve Burke, J. (2023, 2 Şubat). Wagner mercenaries sustain losses in fight for Central African Republic gold. the Guardian. Erişim adresi https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/feb/02/wagner-mercenaries-sustain-losses-in-fight-for-central-african-republic-gold
  50. Singer, P. W. (2004a). War, profits, and the vacuum of law: privatized military firms and international law. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (42) 521, 522.
  51. Singer, P. W. (2004b). The private military ındustry and Iraq: What have we learned and where to next? Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) Policy Paper. Erişim adresi https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/14132/pp4_singer.pdf
  52. Singer, P. W. (2007, 2 Ekim). The dark truth about Blackwater. Brookings. Erişim adresi https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-dark-truth-about-blackwater/
  53. Sommer, J. (2022, 5 Mart). Russia’s War Prompts a Pitch for ‘Socially Responsible’ Military Stocks. New York Times. Erişim adresi https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/04/business/military-stocks-russia-ukraine.html
  54. Spearin, C. (2017). Private military and security companies and states: Force divided. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  55. Torroja, H. (2017). Ideas on the International Minimum Standard for the Privatization, Export, and Import of Armed Coercion. Helena Torroja (Ed.). Public International Law and Human Rights Violations by Private Military and Security Companies. Cham: Springer
  56. Triebert, C. ve Khavin, D. (2023, 24 Ocak) Imagery Shows How a Cemetery for Russian Mercenaries Is Expanding, New York Times. Erişim adresi https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/24/world/europe/wagner-group-cemetery-russia-ukraine.html
  57. U.S. Department of State. (2013, 16 Ağustos). State Department to Incorporate International Code of Conduct into Worldwide Protective Services Contracts. Erişim adresi https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2013/08/213212.htm
  58. UN Global Compact. (t.y.). The Ten Principles. Erişim adresi https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles.
  59. UNGA. (2010). Report of the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination with the Draft of a Possible Convention on Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs) for Consideration and Action by the Human Rights Council. A/HRC/15/25.
  60. UNHRC. (2008) Report of the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of People to Self-Determination. del Prado, G. (Rapporteur). A/HRC/7/7.
  61. UNHRC. (2011). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework. Report of the Special Rep- resentative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises. A/HRC/17/31 Erişim adresi http://www.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding- principles-21-mar-2011.pdf.
  62. United Nations. (1989). International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries. Vol.2163, Status.17(37). Erişim adresi https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=XVIII-6&chapter=18&clang=_en
  63. Van Amstel, N. ve Rodenhäuser, T. (2016). The Montreux Documents and the International Code of Conduct: Understanding the relationship between international initiatives to regulate the global private security industry. A Centre for Security, Development and the Rule of Law. (DCAF). Working Paper No.1. Erişim adresi https://ssrn.com/abstract=2763932.
  64. Walker, S. ve Sauer, P. (2023, 23 Ağustos). Yevgeny Prigozhin: the hotdog seller who rose to the top of Putin’s war machine. the Guardian. Erişim adresi https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/24/yevgeny-prigozhin-the-hotdog-seller-who-rose-to-the-top-of-putin-war-machine-wagner-group
  65. White, N. D. (2011). The privatisation of military and security functions and human rights: comments on the UN Working Group’s Draft Convention. Human Rights Law Review, 11(1), 133-151.
  66. Yaffa, J. (2023, 31 Temmuz). Inside the Wagner Group’s Armed Uprising. Newyorker. Erişim adresi https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/08/07/inside-the-wagner-uprising
  67. Zerk, J. A. (2006). Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility: Limitations and Opportunities in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.