KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2

İhracat Piyasalarındaki Tekelci Yapılar Karşısında Küçük Tarım İşletmelerinin İhracat Olanakları : Yalova İli Özelinde Bir Değerlendirme

Zelha Altınkaya(YALOVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6964-7182
Sayfa
165–191
Yayın Tarihi
2023-10-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Literatür taraması sonucunda, dünya tarım ürünleri ihracat piyasa yapısının tekelci olduğu; istatistiki bilgilerle de Türk tarım ürünleri piyasasının, tam rekabetçi piyasalarda olduğu gibi çok küçük üreticilerden oluştuğu tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, tarım ürünleri ihracat piyasalarında eksik rekabetin varlığını sorgulamayı ve Türkiye’deki küçük tarım işletmelerinin, bu piyasalarda ihracat yapabilmeleri için kuracakları iş birlikleri üzerine, kavramsal, teorik bir değerlendirme yapmayı amaçlamaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu üreticilerin, kooperatif çatısında ihracat yapmalarının, stratejik ticaret teorilerinin öneri sürdüğü gibi, yurtdışındaki tekelci piyasalara karşı fiyatlarını ve miktarlarını kendi belirleyebilecekleri rekabet şartlarını elde etmeleri ve tekelci piyasalardaki aşırı karların ülkeye yönlendirilmesinde önemli bir üstünlük sunacağı sonucuna varılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Literatür taraması sonucunda, dünya tarım ürünleri ihracat piyasa yapısının tekelci olduğu; istatistiki bilgilerle de Türk tarım ürünleri piyasasının, tam rekabetçi piyasalarda olduğu gibi çok küçük üreticilerden oluştuğu tespit edilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Deneysel Tarla Denemesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:tarım · ihracat · tekelci yapılar

Özet

Bu çalışma, tarım ürünleri ihracat piyasalarında eksik rekabetin varlığını sorgulamayı ve Türkiye’deki küçük tarım işletmelerinin, bu piyasalarda ihracat yapabilmeleri için kuracakları iş birlikleri üzerine, kavramsal, teorik bir değerlendirme yapmayı amaçlamaktadır. Liberalizm, uluslararası ticareti, tam rekabetçi piyasa yapılarında, arz ve talebin birlikte oluşturduğu piyasa dengesi ile açıklar. Klasik uluslararası ticaret teorilerinin temel varsayımlarını karşılayan tek piyasa, tarım ürünleri piyasasıdır. Bu makale, bu varsayıma karşın, tarım piyasalarındaki tekelci piyasalara ilişkin, kavramsal ve teorik bir açıklama getirmekte, bir model önerisi yapmaktadır. Çalışma, tarihi vaka ve istatistiki veri analizi metodunu kullanmıştır. Literatür taraması sonucunda, dünya tarım ürünleri ihracat piyasa yapısının tekelci olduğu; istatistiki bilgilerle de Türk tarım ürünleri piyasasının, tam rekabetçi piyasalarda olduğu gibi çok küçük üreticilerden oluştuğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu üreticilerin, kooperatif çatısında ihracat yapmalarının, stratejik ticaret teorilerinin öneri sürdüğü gibi, yurtdışındaki tekelci piyasalara karşı fiyatlarını ve miktarlarını kendi belirleyebilecekleri rekabet şartlarını elde etmeleri ve tekelci piyasalardaki aşırı karların ülkeye yönlendirilmesinde önemli bir üstünlük sunacağı sonucuna varılmıştır. Literatürde az sayıda çalışma vardır. Türkiye’de çok sayıda kooperatif olmasına karşın, bu kooperatifleri, küçük ölçekli üreticilerin, stratejik ticaret politikalarının, dünya ihracat piyasalarındaki aşırı karları Türkiye’ye kaydırılması konusunda bir politika izlemesine ilişkin de az sayıda çalışmadan biri olacaktır. Ayrıca, oyun teorisinin tarım ürünleri piyasasında uygulanması konusunda özgünlük taşımaktadır. Araştırma, Yalova ili özelinde bir saha çalışmasını da içermektedir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Altınkaya, Z. (2023). İhracat Piyasalarındaki Tekelci Yapılar Karşısında Küçük Tarım İşletmelerinin İhracat Olanakları : Yalova İli Özelinde Bir Değerlendirme. Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 165–191. https://ajindex.com/articles/970734

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (114)

  1. ABD Tarım Bakanlığı (2021). What is agriculture's share of the overall U.S. economy? Economic Research Service U.S. Department of Agriculture. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/chart-gallery/gallery/chart-detail /?chartId =58270).
  2. ABD Tarım Bakanlığı (2021). USDA ERS - Chart Detail(2015).What is agriculture's share of the overall U.S economy? USDA ERS - Chart Detail.
  3. ABD Federal Komisyon (2021). Federal Trade Commission | Protecting America's Consumers (ftc.gov)
  4. AB (2021). Agriculture statistics-family farming in the EU-Statistics Explained https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Agriculture_statistics_-_family_farming_in_the_EU
  5. Adamopoulos, T. ve D. Restuccia (2014). The Size Distribution of Farms and International Productivity Differences. The American Economic Review, 104(6)1667-1697 https://www.jstor.org/stable/42920862.
  6. Agarwal, B. ve Dorin, B. (2019). Group farming in France: Why do some regions have more cooperative ventures than others? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(3), 781–804.
  7. Agbo, M, Rousselière, D. ve Salanié, J. (2015). Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives with Direct Selling: A Cooperative Non Cooperative Game. Journal of Economic Behavior ve Organization 109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.11.003.
  8. Agarwal, B. (2018). Can group farms outperform individual family farms? Empirical insights from India World Development, 108, 57–73.
  9. Akundi, L. (2018). International And Institutional Cooperation In Food And Agriculture World Affair. The Journal of International Issues. 22(4), 102-121. https://www.jstor.org/stable /10.2307/48520099.
  10. Alston, J, Sexton, R. ve M. Zhan (1997). The Effects of Imperfect Competition on the Size and Distribution of Research Benefits. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(4), 1252-1265.
  11. AB (2021) European Commission-the Common Agricultural Policy after 2013.
  12. Bagwell, K. ve R. W. Staiger (2000). Strategic Trade, Competitive Industries and Agriculture. Economics and Politics. Wiley.
  13. Barton, J., H. (1998). The Impact Of Contemporary Patent Law On Plant Biotechnology Research. Ediors, S. A. Eberhart, H. L. Shands, W. Collins, R. L. Lower. https://doi.org/10.2135/1998.
  14. Bakucs, Z., Ferto, I. Gabor ve G. Szabo (2012) Benefits Of A Marketing Cooperative n Transition Agriculture: Mórakert Purchasing And Service Co-Operative. Society and Economy, 34(3), 453–468. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/90002268.
  15. Beggs, A. ve P. D. Klemperer (1992). Multiperiod Competition with Switching Costs.Econometrics, 60, 651.
  16. Brander, J. (1995). Strategic Trade Policy in Handbook of International Economics, 3. (eds). G. M. Grossman and K. Rogoff, N. Holland, Elsevier Science.
  17. Brander, J. A. ve B. J. Spencer. (1985). Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry. Journal of International Economics, 18(1-2), 83-100. http://.w1464.pdf (nber.org).
  18. Brewin, D. (2016). Competition in Canada’s Agricultural Value Chains: The Case of Grain. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64, 5–19. DOI: 10.1111/cjag.12100.
  19. Bunker, R. A ve M.L.Cook (1980). Farmer Cooperatives in International Grain and Oilseed Markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62,(5), 899-903 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1240279.
  20. Carter, C. A., MacLaren, D. ve A. Yılmaz (1999). How Competitive is the World Wheat Market. IIFET
  21. Berkes, F. (2017). Environmental Governance for the Anthropoecene? Social Ecological Systems, Resilience, and Collaborative Learning. Sustainability, 9, 1-12.
  22. Caves, R. (1977-78). Organization, Scale, and Performance in the Grain Trade, Food Research Institute Studies, 16, 107- 123.
  23. Caves, R. ve T. Pugel (1982). New Evidence on Competition in the Grain Trade, Food Research Institute Studies, 18, 261-274.
  24. Chamberlin, E. H. (1933). The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.149953/page/n13/mode/2up
  25. Chen, J., Gong, H. ve Y. Guo (2019). The Relationship between International Shipping Market Environment and Price Change in Scale-free Network. Journal of Coastal Research, 93, 889-894. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26853371
  26. Chen, B. ve S. Saghian (2016). Market Integration and Price Transmission in the World Rice Export Markets. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economic, 41(3), 444-457. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44131349
  27. Chen, C., McCarl, B. Chang, C-C. ve Shih Hsun Hsu (2002). Spatial Equilibrium Modeling with Imperfectly Competitive Markets: An Application to Rice Trade. AAEA Annual Meeting. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/7001665.pdf
  28. Choi, K., Lee, K. ve Seonyoung Lim (2016). Strategic Trade Policies in International Rivalry When Competition is Endogenous Hitotsubashi. Journal of Economics, 57(2), 223-241. https://www.jstor. org /stable /44089907
  29. Cournot, A (1838). Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses, Hachette, Paris Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth.English edition of Cournot (1838), trans. by N.T Bacon, Kelley.
  30. Codognato, G. ve L. A. Julien. (2013). Non-Cooperative Oligopoly in Markets with a Cobb-Douglas Continuum of Traders. Louvain Economic Review.79 (4), Recent Developments in Strategic Interactions and General Equilibrium, 75-88. https://www.jstor.org /stable /42771214
  31. Choi, J. P. ve H. Gerlach (2012). Global Cartels, Leniency Programs and International Antitrust Cooperation. International Journal of Industrial Organization,30, 528-540.
  32. Cramer, G. L, Wailes, E. J. ve S. Shangnan (1993). Impacts of Liberalizing Trade in the World Rice Market American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75(1), 219-226. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1242970
  33. Çakır, M. ve J. Nolan (2015). Revisiting Concentration in Food and Agricultural Supply Chains. The Welfare Implications of Market Power in a Complementary Input Sector. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 40(2), 203-219. https://www.jstor.org /stable /441 31858
  34. Deodhar, S. Y. ve I. M. Sheldon (1999). Market Power in the World Market for Soymeal Exports. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 22(1), 78-86. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40986933
  35. Dixit, A. (1987). International Trade Policy for Oligopolistic Industries,in International Trade, ed. Jagdish Bhagwati. MIT Press, 183-192.
  36. Dünya Ticaret Örgütü (2022). World Trade Organization. Subsidies, Trade, and International Cooperation Prepared by staff of IMF, OECD, World Bank, and WTO. https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news22_e/igo_22apr22_e.pdf
  37. Dünya Ticaret Örgütü (2001) Doha Beyannamesi https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dda_e/dohaexplained_e.htm
  38. Eaton, J. ve G. M. Grossman (1986). Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy under Oligopoly. Quarterly J. of Economics,101, 383- 406.
  39. FAO (2021). The State of Food and Agriculture Innovation in Family Farming. https://www.fao.org/3/i4040e/i4040e.pdf
  40. FAO (2022) Trade: Crops and livestock products. In: FAO. Romehttps://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/TCL
  41. Fulton, M. ve T. Reynolds (2015). The Political Economy of Food Price Volatility: The Case of Vietnam and Rice American Journal of Agricultural Economics,.97(4),1206-1226.
  42. Ghosh, A. ve M. Mitra (2014). Reversal of Bertrand Cournot Rankings in the Presence of Welfare Concerns. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 170(3), 496-519.
  43. Goodhou, R. E. ve R. J. Sexton (2020). Agricultural Support Policies in Imperfectly Competitive Markets. Why Market Power Matters in Policy Design.American Journal of Agricultural, Economics, 93(5),132-1340. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3571602#
  44. GATT (1994). Article XVI Subsidies. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/ai17_e/gatt1994_art16 gatt47.pdf
  45. GATT (1994) 16.Madde. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/ai17_e/gatt1994_art16_jur.pdf
  46. Gupta, B. (2001). The International Tea Cartel During the Great Depression, 1929-1933. The Journal of Economic History, 61(1), 144-159. https://www.jstor.org/stable /269 7858
  47. Grossman, G. M. ve E. Helpman (1995). Trade Wars and Trade Talks. Journal of Political Economy. 103(4), 675-708.
  48. Helpman, E. ve P. R. Krugman (1989). Trade Policy and Market Structure. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
  49. Hendrickson, M. K., Howard, P. ve Douglas, H.C. (2019). Power, Food and Agriculture: Implication for Farmers, Consumers and Communities. In Defense of Farmers: The Future of Agriculture in The Shadow of Corporate Power.U. of Nebraska P.https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/171171/1/20171101hendrickson_howard_constnce_ power_food_ and _agri culture.pdf
  50. Hirschman, A. (1945). National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. University of California Press.
  51. Huang, S. ve R. J. Sexton (1996). Measuring Returns to an Innovation in an Imperfectly Competitive Market: Application to Mechanical Harvesting of Processing Tomatoes in Taiwan. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(3), 558-57. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2307/124274
  52. Igami, M. (2015). Market Power in International Commod231ity Trade:The Case of Coffee. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 63(2), 225-248. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44077356
  53. İstanbul Ticaret Borsası (2021). Tarımsal İşletme Yapı Araştırması, 2016 https://www.istib.org.tr/resim/siteici/files/Tar%C4%B1msal%20%C4%B0%C5%9Fletme%20Yap%C4%B1%20Ara%C5%9Ft%C4%B1rmas%C4%B1%202016.pdf Josling, T., Anderson, K., Schmitz, A. ve S. Tangermann (2010). Understanding Int.Trade in Agricultural Products: One Hundred Years of Contribution by Agricultural Economists. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 92, 424-446. https://www.jstor.or g/stable /4064 79 96
  54. Kallio, P, K. S. ve Phillip C. Abbot (1998). Export Subsidies and Switching in an Imperfectly Competitive International Wheat Market. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/20789/
  55. Kallio, P, K. S. (1997). Export Subsidies an Imperfectly Competitive Market When Market Share Matters: The Case of International Wheat Trade. Ph.D. Dissertation, Purdue University.
  56. Karp, L ve J. M. Perloff (1994). A Dynamic Model of Oligopoly in the Export Market. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75(2),448-457. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1242929.
  57. Karp, L., S. ve J. M. Perloff (1989). Dynamic Oligopoly in the Rice Export Market. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(3), 462-470 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1926903
  58. Karp, L., S ve McCalla A. F. (1983). Dynamic Games and International Trade: An Application to the World Corn Market. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,65, 641-656.
  59. Keyder, Ç. ve Yenal Z. (2011). Agrarian Change Under Globalization: Markets and Insecurity in Turkish. Journal of Agrarian Change, 11(1), 60-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00294.
  60. Klemperer, P. ve M. Meyer (1986). Price competition vs. quantity competition: the role of uncertainty. Rand Journal of Economics, 17, 4.
  61. Knutson, R. D. (1974). Cooperative Strategies in Imperfectly Competitive Market Structures. A Policy Perspective. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(5), 904-912.
  62. Krugman, P. (1979). Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition and International Trade. Journal of International Economics, 469-479.
  63. Kurtuluş, K. (1980). Present Status of Marketing Channels in Turkey. Management International Review, 20, 4, 38-46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40227555
  64. Lambertini, L. (1997). Prisoners Dilemma in Duopoly(Super) Games. Journal of Economic Theory, 77, 181.
  65. Langyintuo, A.S. (2010). Grain Distribution in Ghana Under Imperfectly Competitive Market Conditions. No 96166, 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference, September 19-23, Cape Town, S.Africa from AAAE.
  66. Lake, D. (1989). Export, Die or Subsidize: The International Political Economy of American Agriculture 1875-1900. Comparative Studies in Society and History 31(1), 81-105. https://www.jstor.org/stable /178795
  67. Lauck, J. (1996). American Agriculture and the Problem of Monopoly. Agricultural History Society 70(2), 196-215. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3571602#
  68. Jackson, L. A. ve V. M. Lampe (2020). Trends in Agricultural Markets and Policy. oecd_side_event_e.pdf
  69. Lemeilleur, S. ve J. M. Cordon (2011). Marketing Cooperatives and Commission Agent The Turkish Dilemma on the Modern Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Market. Food Policy, 36, 272-279.
  70. Maclaren, D. (2011). Imperfect Competition, State Trading And Japan's Imports of Rice. The Institute of Social and Economic Research Osaka University. Discussion Paper No.806.
  71. Maggi, G. (1996). Strategic Trade Policies with Endogenous Mode of Competition. The American Economic Review, 86(1), 237-258. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118265
  72. Mansfield, E. (1983). Industrial Organization and Technological Change: Recent Econometric Findings. In: Craven J.V. (eds) Industrial Organization, Antitrust, and Public Policy.Middlebury Conf. Series on Economic Issues. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1874-5_7
  73. McCorriston, S. (2002). Why Should Imperfect Competition Matter to Agricultural Economists? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 29(3), 349-371. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurrag/29.3.349 Montegut-Sala, Y. Cristobal-Fransi, E. ve F. Marimon (2010). The Management of Agrarian Cooperative Typologies in the Olive Oil Sector in Spain. Review of International Cooperative Management, 11(2), 719-733.
  74. Moschini, G. ve H. Lapan (1997). Intellectual Property Rights and the Welfare Effects of Agricultural Agricultural RveD. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(4), 1229-124. https://onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/ ep df /10.230 1244280
  75. Myers, R. J., Sexton, R. J.ve W. G.Tomek (2010). A Century of Research On the Agricultural Market. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 92(2), 376-402.
  76. Noakes, J. E. (1967). Agricultural Cooperatives. Antitrust Law Journal, 33, 7-13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40839210
  77. Napasintuwong, O. (2020). Thailand’s maize seed market structure, conduct performance Future of Food: Journal on Food, Agriculture and Society, (2).
  78. Nash, J. (1951) Non Cooperative Games. Annals of Mathematics, 54(2), 286-295. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1969529
  79. Navarro, A., Acedo, F. J., Robson, M., J, Ruzo, E.ve F. Losada (2010). Antecedents and Consequences of Firms Export Commitment:An Empirical Study. Journal of International Marketing,18(2), 41-61. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20750819
  80. Nourse, E. G. (1922). The economic philosophy of cooperation. American Economic Review, 12,577–597. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1804796
  81. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University.
  82. Ozdemir, G. (2005). Cooperative-shareholder Relations in Agricultural Cooperatives in Turkey. Journal of Asian Economics, 6, 315–325.
  83. Patterson, P. M. ve Abbott, P. C. (1994). Further Evidence on Competition in the US Grain Export. Trade. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 42(4), 429-437. http://www.jstor.com/stable/2950447
  84. Patterson, P. M. ve Abbott, P. C. (1992). Further Evidence on Competition in US Grain Export Trade,Occasional Paper OP-35,Organization and Performance of World Food Systems: Ohio.
  85. Perloff, J. M. ve Gordon, C. R. (1983). The Effect of Asymmetrically Held Information and Market Power in Agricultural Markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(2), 366-372. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1240894
  86. Philippidis, G. ve R. Waschuk (2019). Melitz Meets Milk: The Impact of Quota Abolition on EU Dairy Export Competitiveness. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(1), 44-61.https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12276
  87. Prater, M., E., Daniel O’Neil, Jr. ve Adam Sparger (2013). State Grain Rail Statistical Summary U.S.Department of Agriculture. Marketing Service. http://dx.doi.org/10.9752/TS066.06-2013
  88. Pretty, J., Attwood, S., Bawdeb, R., Van Den Berg, H., Bharucha, Z., Dixon, J., Flora, B.,C., Gallagher, K.,Genskow, K., Hartley,S.E.,Ketelaar, J.W., Kiara, J.K., Kumar, V., Lu, Y., Macmillan, Marechall, A. Morales-Abubakar,A. L., Noble, A.P., Prasad, V. V., Rametsteiner, E., Reganold, J., Ricks, J.I., Rockström, J., Saito, O., Thorne, P., Wang, S.,Wittman, H., Winter,M. ve Puyun Yang (2020). Assessment of the growth in social groups for sustainable agriculture and land management. Global Sustainability. 3., e23, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.19
  89. Ricardo, D. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation.
  90. Reimer, J. J. ve K. Stiegert (2006). Imperfect competition and Strategic Trade Theory: Evidence from Int. Food and Agricultural Markets. Journal of Agricultural And Food Industrial, 6, 1134 -1134.
  91. Rothstein, M. (1983). Multinational in the Grain Trade, 1850-1914. Business and Economic History, 12, 85-93. http://www.jstor.com./stable/237027041
  92. Russo, C., R. E., Goodhue ve R. J. Sexton. (2011). Agricultural Support Policies in Imperfectly Competitive Markets: Why Market Power Matters in Policy Design. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93, 1328-1340. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1093/ajae/aar050
  93. Saitone, T. L., Sexton, R. J. ve S. E. Sexton (2008). Market Power in the Corn Sector: How Does It Affect the Impacts of the Ethanol Subsidy? Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 33, 169-194. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41220622
  94. Sexton, R. J. (2013). Market Power, Misconceptions, and Modern Agricultural Markets. American Journal of Agricultural Markets, 95(2), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aas102
  95. Shapiro, C. (1989). Theories of Oligopoly Behaviour.Handbook of Industrial Organization. 329-414.
  96. Shapley, L. S., ve M. Shubik (1954). A method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System, American Political Science Review, 48, 787-792.
  97. Sheldon, I., M. Daniel, H. Pick ve S. McCorriston (2001). Export Subsidies and Profit Shifting in Vertical Markets. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 26, (1), 125-141. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40987099
  98. Shubik, M. (1975). Oligopoly Theory,Communication and Information. The American Review, 65(2), 280-283. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818865
  99. Scrimitore, M. (2013). Profitability Under Commitment in Cournot and Bertrand Mixed Markets. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 170(4), 684-703. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24549017
  100. Shanahan, M., Round, D. K. ve K. A. Round (2013). Cartel Resilian in Australian Markets 1901-1967. Revue Economique, 64 (6), 1011-1042. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42772282
  101. Singh, N. ve X. Vives. (1984). Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly. The Rand Journal Economics,15(4), 546-554. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2555525
  102. Scrimitore, M. (2014). Profitability Under Commitment in Cournot and Bertrand Mixed Markets. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 170(4), 684-703.
  103. Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry to the Nature and Causes of The Wealth of Nations. Sukpitak, J. ve V.Hengpunya (2016).The Influence of Trading Volume on Market Efficiency. The DCCA Approach. Physica, 458, 259-265.
  104. Talbot, J. M. (1996). Regulation the Coffee Commodity Chain: Internationalization and the Coffee Cartel.Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 40, 113-149.
  105. TÜİK, 2023. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Dis-Ticaret-Istatistikleri-Eylul-2021-37421
  106. Unilever, 2022. Annual Report and Accounts 2020 (unilever.com).
  107. T. C. Ticaret Bakanlığı, (2020). Türkiye Kooperatif İstatistikleri. ticaret.gov.tr
  108. T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı, 2022). https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/TAGEM/Belgeler/yayin /SU%CC%88 S%20BI%CC%87TKI%CC%87LERI%CC%87sekto%CC%88rpolitika%20.pdf
  109. Varga, Z. (1967). Societal Control and Interests in the Agricultural Cooperative Movement https://heinonline.org/HOL/Landing%20Page?handle=hein.journals/acfpoiu22&div=24&id=&page=
  110. Varga, Z. (2015). Opportunities and Limitations for Enterprise in the Socialist Economy.The Case of the Budapest Agricultural Cooperatives.The Hungarian historical review 4(4) 928-963
  111. Yamaura, K. (2011). Market Power of The Japanese Non-GM Soybean Import Market: The U.S. Exporters vs. Japanese Importers. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development. 1(2), 80-89.
  112. Weldegebriel, H. T. (2004). Agricultural Economics Society Prize Essay Imperfect Price Transmission: Is Market Power Really to Blame? Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(1), 101-114. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2004.tb00082.
  113. WTO. (2022). World Agricultural Subsidies Boxes https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/agric_e/agboxes_e.htm
  114. Hendrickson, M. K., Howard, P. ve Douglas, H.C. (2019). Power, Food and Agriculture: Implication for Farmers, Consumers and Communities. In Defense of Farmers: The Future of Agriculture in The Shadow of Corporate Power.U. of Nebraska P.https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/171171/1/20171101hendrickson_howard_constnce_ power_food_ and _agri culture.pdf