Dergiler / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3

Breast Cancer Segmentation from Ultrasound Images Using ResNext-based U-Net Model

Sayfa
871–886
Yayın Tarihi
2023-09-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Experts could use the proposed pixel-based segmentation method for breast cancer diagnosis and monitoring.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Breast cancer is a type of cancer caused by the uncontrolled growth and proliferation of cells in the breast tissue.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Modern approaches based on image classifier deep learning models provide significant results in disease detection, but are not suitable for clinical use due to their black-box structure.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Experts could use the proposed pixel-based segmentation method for breast cancer diagnosis and monitoring.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Breast cancer · Ultrasound images · Semantic segmentation

Abstract

Breast cancer is a type of cancer caused by the uncontrolled growth and proliferation of cells in the breast tissue. Differentiating between benign and malignant tumors is critical in the detection and treatment of breast cancer. Traditional methods of cancer detection by manual analysis of radiological images are time-consuming and error-prone due to human factors. Modern approaches based on image classifier deep learning models provide significant results in disease detection, but are not suitable for clinical use due to their black-box structure. This paper presents a semantic segmentation method for breast cancer detection from ultrasound images. First, an ultrasound image of any resolution is divided into 256×256 pixel patches by passing it through an image cropping function. These patches are sequentially numbered and given as input to the model. Features are extracted from the 256×256 pixel patches with pre-trained ResNext models placed in the encoder network of the U-Net model. These features are processed in the default decoder network of the U-Net model and estimated at the output with three different pixel values: benign tumor areas (1), malignant tumor areas (2) and background areas (0). The prediction masks obtained at the output of the decoder network are combined sequentially to obtain the final prediction mask. The proposed method is validated on a publicly available dataset of 780 ultrasound images of female patients. The ResNext-based U-Net model achieved 73.17% intersection over union (IoU) and 83.42% dice coefficient (DC) on the test images. ResNext-based U-Net models perform better than the default U-Net model. Experts could use the proposed pixel-based segmentation method for breast cancer diagnosis and monitoring.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KATAR, O., YILDIRIM, Ö. (2023). Breast Cancer Segmentation from Ultrasound Images Using ResNext-based U-Net Model. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 871–886. https://ajindex.com/articles/966019

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. J. S. You and P. A. Jones, “Cancer genetics and epigenetics: two sides of the same coin?,” Cancer Cell, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 9–20, 2012
  2. S. Gómez-López, R. G. Lerner, and C. Petritsch, “Asymmetric cell division of stem and progenitor cells during homeostasis and cancer,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 71, pp. 575–597, 2014
  3. N. Parsa, “Environmental factors inducing human cancers,” Iran J Public Health, vol. 41, no. 11, p. 1, 2012
  4. M. Hejmadi, Introduction to cancer biology. Bookboon, 2014
  5. M. Amrane, S. Oukid, I. Gagaoua, and T. Ensari, “Breast cancer classification using machine learning,” in 2018 electric electronics, computer science, biomedical engineerings’ meeting (EBBT), IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–4
  6. J. Boutry et al., “The evolution and ecology of benign tumors,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Reviews on Cancer, vol. 1877, no. 1, p. 188643, 2022
  7. K. Soda, “The mechanisms by which polyamines accelerate tumor spread,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 30, pp. 1–9, 2011
  8. L. Wilkinson and T. Gathani, “Understanding breast cancer as a global health concern,” Br J Radiol, vol. 95, no. 1130, p. 20211033, 2022
  9. K. Mortezaee, “Organ tropism in solid tumor metastasis: an updated review,” Future Oncology, vol. 17, no. 15, pp. 1943–1961, 2021
  10. O. Ginsburg et al., “Breast cancer early detection: A phased approach to implementation,” Cancer, vol. 126, pp. 2379–2393, 2020
  11. E. Michael, H. Ma, H. Li, and S. Qi, “An optimized framework for breast cancer classification using machine learning,” Biomed Res Int, vol. 2022, 2022
  12. F. A. González-Luna, J. Hernández-López, and W. Gomez-Flores, “A performance evaluation of machine learning techniques for breast ultrasound classification,” in 2019 16th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–5
  13. M. Wei, Y. Du, X. Wu, and J. Zhu, “Automatic classification of benign and malignant breast tumors in ultrasound image with texture and morphological features,” in 2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on Anti-counterfeiting, Security, and Identification (ASID), IEEE, 2019, pp. 126–130
  14. K. Atrey, B. K. Singh, N. K. Bodhey, and R. B. Pachori, “Mammography and ultrasound based dual modality classification of breast cancer using a hybrid deep learning approach,” Biomed Signal Process Control, vol. 86, p. 104919, 2023
  15. A. Raza, N. Ullah, J. A. Khan, M. Assam, A. Guzzo,