Dergiler / Research on Education and Psychology / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Development of Parent Educational Philosophy Tendency Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

Sayfa
328–348
Yayın Tarihi
2023-09-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result, in the light of the analyzes and expert opinions, the items of the scale could measure the intended quality and the structure to be measured, the construct validity was high and it performed stable measurements.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The present study endeavors to formulate a measurement tool that is both valid and reliable, intended to assess the educational philosophy tendencies of parents.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The sampling process was executed through the utilization of multistage sampling. 1,330 parents formed the sample of the scale development process.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result, in the light of the analyzes and expert opinions, the items of the scale could measure the intended quality and the structure to be measured, the construct validity was high and it performed stable measurements.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Parent · Educational philosophy · Tendency scale

Abstract

The present study endeavors to formulate a measurement tool that is both valid and reliable, intended to assess the educational philosophy tendencies of parents. The sampling process was executed through the utilization of multistage sampling. 1,330 parents formed the sample of the scale development process. This sample was randomly divided into two, half for exploratory factor analysis and half for confirmatory factor analysis. 65.7% of the participants are female and 34.3% are male. 41.2% of the participants are primary school parents, 30.6% are secondary school parents and 28.2% are high school parents. The Parent Educational Philosophy Tendency Scale’s construct validity was first tested with exploratory factor analysis and then confirmatory factor analysis was performed, and findings related to these analyzes are presented respectively. As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, the scale consisted of 19 items and three sub-dimensions, and these dimensions are named individualist, subject-centered, and socialist in line with the literature. The three-factor structure of the scale was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. In addition, the differences between the averages of the 27% lower and upper groups in the scale items were significant. According to the reliability analysis, the Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficient values of the scale are .896 for the “individualist” sub-dimension, .781 for the “socialist” sub-dimension, and .717 for the “subject-centered” sub-dimension of the Parent Educational Philosophy Tendency Scale. The Parent Educational Philosophy Tendency Scale represents the perception of parents’ philosophy of education. The internal consistency coefficients of the sub-dimensions of the Parent Educational Philosophy Tendency Scale were at a reasonable level. As a result, in the light of the analyzes and expert opinions, the items of the scale could measure the intended quality and the structure to be measured, the construct validity was high and it performed stable measurements.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YİLMAZ, E., YILDIRIM, R. (2023). Development of Parent Educational Philosophy Tendency Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. Research on Education and Psychology, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 328–348. https://ajindex.com/articles/964678

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Acar-Erdol, T. (2018). Permanence. F. Manav (Editor). In the philosophy of education (p. 93-106). (1st Edition). Ankara:
  2. Pegem Academy, Alkayiş, A. (2021). Digitalization and Education 4.0 from the perspective of education philosophy. Bingol University Journal of Social Sciences Institute (BUSBED), 11(21), 221-237.
  3. Anderson, K.J. & Mınke, K.M. (2007) Parent Involvement in education:Toward an Understanding of Parents’ Decision Making. The Journal of Educational Research p.311-323
  4. Arslan, A. (2017). Felsefeye giriş [Introduction to Philosophy]. Ankara: BB101 Yayınları.
  5. Aslan, S. (2017). Examination of primary school teachers' educational beliefs in terms of various variables. Kastamonu Magazine, 25(4), 1453-1458.
  6. Aytaç, A. (2020). Öğretmen adaylarının epistemolojik inançlarının ve eğitim felsefesi eğilimlerinin öğretme ve öğrenme anlayışları üzerindeki etkisi [The impact of teacher candidates' epistemological beliefs and educational philosophy tendencies on their understanding of teaching and learning]. [PhD Thesis] Balıkesir University. Bago, A. L., (2001). Curriculum development: the Philippine experience. 2nd Edition. C & E Publishing, Inc Baş, G. (2016). The relationship between teachers' philosophy of education beliefs and their teaching-learning understanding. Education and Science, 40(182). Bhat, A. M. (2019). Islamic philosophy of education. Bilbao, P. B., (2015). Field Study 6. Lorimar Publishing. Quezon City Biçer, B., Er, H., & Özel, A. (2013). The relationship between pre-service teachers' epistemological beliefs and their educational philosophies. Theory and Practice in Education. Campbell, J. (1995) Understanding John Dewey: Nature and Cooperative Intelligence, Open Court, Chicago. Carr, W. (2004). Philosophy and education. Journal of Philosophy of education, 38(1), 55-73.
  7. Chen, C., & Uttal, D. H. (1988). Cultural values, parents’ beliefs, and children’s achievement in the United States and China. Human development, 31(6), 351-358.
  8. Clarke, B. L., Sheridan, S. M. ve Woods, K. E. (2009). Elements of healthy family-school relationships. In S. L. Christenson & A. L. Reschly (Eds.). Handbook of school-family partnerships, New York: Routledge, 61–79.
  9. Cramer, D., & Bryman, A. (2001). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS Release 10 for Windows: a guide for social scientists. Routledge. Cohen, L. M., & Gelbrich, J. (1999). Educational philosophies. Retrieved, 8(01), 2010.
  10. Çetin, B., İlhan, M., & Arslan, S. (2012). Examining the educational philosophies