KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 2

The Poverty Reduction And Social Capital Relationship: Comparative Findings From Selected OECD Countries

Murat BAYRAKTAR
Neşe ALGAN
Harun BAL
Başak Gül AKAR
Esma ERDOĞAN
Sayfa
133–144
Yayın Tarihi
2023-10-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is important for developing countries to implement policies that increase social capital levels (especially bridging and linking types of social capital) for economic development in terms of increasing their per capita GDP levels.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:One of the most important elements of the fight against poverty is social capital.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In our study, which aims to analyze the positive effects of social capital on poverty within the scope of new data and samples, analyzes were made within the scope of selected OECD countries RE findings from the econometric analysis indicate that all variables have a positive effect on GDP per capita for the 2012-2019 period in 12 selected countries.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is important for developing countries to implement policies that increase social capital levels (especially bridging and linking types of social capital) for economic development in terms of increasing their per capita GDP levels.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2012-2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Poverty · Panel Analysis · Social Capital

Abstract

One of the most important elements of the fight against poverty is social capital. Social capital is of critical importance in the fight against poverty because of its ability to activate existing resources in the economic development process of countries and to prevent all resources, opportunities, and, potentials from being idle, especially for the poor. In our study, which aims to analyze the positive effects of social capital on poverty within the scope of new data and samples, analyzes were made within the scope of selected OECD countries RE findings from the econometric analysis indicate that all variables have a positive effect on GDP per capita for the 2012-2019 period in 12 selected countries. In general, our results are consistent with previous studies. The social capital coefficient gives the biggest positive effect on GDP per capita compared to other types of capital. It is important for developing countries to implement policies that increase social capital levels (especially bridging and linking types of social capital) for economic development in terms of increasing their per capita GDP levels.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAYRAKTAR, M., ALGAN, N., BAL, H., AKAR, B. G., ERDOĞAN, E. (2023). The Poverty Reduction And Social Capital Relationship: Comparative Findings From Selected OECD Countries. Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 2, 133–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/963087

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. & Johnson, S., 2001. “The Colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 91, pp. 1369-1401.
  2. Adi Syahid, M. A., Faathirah, J. & Tuan M. Z., 2021. “Social Capital In Poverty Reduction: A Systematic Literature Review”, Turkısh Journal Of Computer And Mathematıc Educatıon, Turkbilmat Egitim Hizmetleri, 4, 665, ISSN:13094653. Agarwala, M., Atkinson, G. Fry, B. P., Homewood, K., Mourato, S., Rowcliffe, J. M., Wallace, G. & Milner-Gulland, E. J., 2014. “Assessing the Relationship between Human Well-Being and Ecosystem Services: A Review of Frameworks”. Conservation and Society 12 (4): 437–49.
  3. Agarwala, M. & Zenghelis, D., 2021. “The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. In Social Capital and the Changing Wealth of Nations”. World Bank. ISBN: 978-1-4648-1590-4.
  4. Algan, Y. &. Cahuc, P., 2009. “Civic Culture and Labor Market Institutions”, The American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, Vol. 1(1), pp. 1-55.
  5. Algan, Y. &. Cahuc, P., 2010. “Inherited trust and growth”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 100, pp. 2060-2092.
  6. Algan, Y. & Cahuc, P., 2014. “Trust, Growth, and Well-Being: New Evidence and Policy Implications”. In Handbook of Economic Growth (Vol. 2), edited by P. Aghion and S. N. Durlauf, 49–120.
  7. Oxford, UK: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53538-2.00002-2.
  8. Arrow, K. J., 1972. “Gifts and Exchanges”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, Vol. 1(4), pp. 343-362.
  9. Banfield, E., 1958. The Moral Basis of a Backward Society, Free Press,
  10. New York. Baiyegunhi, L.J.S., 2014. “Social capital effects on rural household poverty in Msinga, Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa”. Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa, 53(2), 47-64. DOI: 10.1080/03031853.2014.915478 Bourdieu, P.,1986. “The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education”, edited by J. G. Richardson, 241–58. New York: Greenwood. Coleman, J.S., 1974.
  11. Power and the Structure of Society, Norton, New York. Dasgupta, P. & Serageldin, I. (eds.), 2000. “Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective”, World Bank, Washington D.C. Dasgupta, P., 2005. “Economics of Social Capital”. Economic Record 81 (s1): S2–S21. Dasgupta, P., 2011. “A Matter of Trust: Social Capital and Economic Development. In Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics (ABCDE)—Global 2010: Lessons from East Asia and the Global Financial Crisis”, edited by J. Lin and B. Pleskovic, 119–55. Washi